Skip to comments.
PBS Offers Intelligent Design Documentary
CREATION - Evolution Headlines ^
| 04/28/2003
| Illustra Media/CREATION - Evolution Headlines
Posted on 05/02/2003 10:26:29 AM PDT by Remedy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 881-887 next last
To: bondserv
"Once again, even if you utterly disproved evolution, how would this prove the Bible correct?"
Let me make it simple, we live in a sustained environment. Think of a usable swimming pool, without continuous maintenance it would be unusable.
That does not answer my question. How would disproving evolution prove that the Bible is correct?
301
posted on
05/03/2003 10:27:05 AM PDT
by
Dimensio
(Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
To: PatrickHenry
Your tax dollars at work Didn't PBS recently run a long pro-evo series?
To: Dataman
Nothing Pseudo religious about it.
Just documented fact.
Nice try though....
303
posted on
05/03/2003 10:44:34 AM PDT
by
Aric2000
(Are you on Grampa Dave's team? I am!! $5 a month is all it takes, come join!!!)
To: balrog666
Toilet skipping placemarker.
304
posted on
05/03/2003 11:18:50 AM PDT
by
balrog666
(When in doubt, tell the truth. - Mark Twain)
To: Tribune7
Didn't PBS recently run a long pro-evo series? I don't know; I rarely watch PBS. But what's the point here? If they run an astronomy series, must they then run an astrology series too?
305
posted on
05/03/2003 12:39:24 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
Comment #306 Removed by Moderator
To: shawne
What do you understand to be the evidence for tectonic plate motion?
307
posted on
05/03/2003 1:43:47 PM PDT
by
atlaw
To: shawne
Once the Creater has created something (such as how water interacts with temperature) there is no more need for involvement. I agree completely.
So He created a set of natural laws that permitted mutation and the survival of the fittest. Having done that, why not let the laws do their thing? Why couldn't an all powerful God use evolution as a tool of His creation?
Comment #309 Removed by Moderator
Comment #310 Removed by Moderator
To: Right Wing Professor
Why couldn't an all powerful God use evolution as a tool of His creation? Apparently they don't think he is smart enough.
To: shawne
My point is that you seem to accept the inferences drawn from plate boundries, hot spots, fossil placement, etc. as evidence of plate movement, yet you apparently do not accept any inferences whatsoever from the fossil record, demonstrable speciation, the geologic column, etc. as evidence of evolution. Why is that?
312
posted on
05/03/2003 2:37:01 PM PDT
by
atlaw
Comment #313 Removed by Moderator
Comment #314 Removed by Moderator
Comment #315 Removed by Moderator
Comment #316 Removed by Moderator
To: metacognative
New DNA information cannot come from mistakes. Umm... You can't continue to use your apparent definition of "information" and argue with the math/science guys at the same time. There is a very precise mathematical definition of information that is used in science and math (and economics and engineering, etc). For starters, an increase in entropy causes an increase in information content. Anything that increases the entropy of DNA is increasing its information content, and for better or worse (depending on the situation), most things that modify the DNA (viruses, random chemicals, radiation) generally either increase the information content or destroy the DNA. So random natural processes are creating "new DNA information" all the time. In fact there are processes in the cells that have the function of preventing the addition of new DNA information to protect against the fact that it happens frequently.
To: Dataman
Special pleading. You did not offer an answer at all. How did something outside the universe come into being?
318
posted on
05/03/2003 3:14:59 PM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: shawne
Continental drift is well accepted today. It was not in the recent past. Your incredulity that anyone ever questioned the idea is misplaced.
What you describe as irrefutable proof (fault lines, earthquakes, volcanic activity, hot spots, magnetic striping at mid-ocean ridges, etc.) is actually proof of what might be called "micro-movement" (perhaps analogous to "micro-evolution"?). Macro-movement (the drift of entire continents) was not readily accepted as a reasonable inference from such micro-movement. After all, no one has ever actually seen a continent move.
Your willingness to accept without question the inference of macro-movement from the available evidence just seems peculiar to me. One hears all the time that while "micro-evolution" may be true, that is no evidence of "macro-evolution", and that evolution is nothing but sheer spectulation due to the lack of eye-witness evidence. It just seems logical that you would apply this same reasoning to plate tectonics.
319
posted on
05/03/2003 3:15:34 PM PDT
by
atlaw
To: bondserv
Think of a usable swimming pool, without continuous maintenance it would be unusable.Only to humans. Wrigglers do quite well in non-maintained pools. So do tadpoles. So does algae. Niches weren't created for you; you just found your niche.
320
posted on
05/03/2003 3:18:11 PM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 881-887 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson