Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tariq Aziz Says He Has Information on 12 year POW Capt. Scott Spiecher (1st Gulf War)
FOX News ^ | April 29, 2003 | Greta Van Sustern

Posted on 04/29/2003 8:16:04 PM PDT by ewing

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:36:17 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 last
To: pnz1
That's right, but they also have kids of their own...
81 posted on 05/01/2003 7:06:44 AM PDT by New Horizon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: buffyt
He was placed in a MIA status. As such, he is subject to promotion along with his peer group. As a current Navy guy, I confirmed that he was indeed, selected to 06. As such, all pay and allowances are maintained.

I'm just not sure where his pay is going if his wife remarried. Probably towards the children.
82 posted on 05/01/2003 7:52:48 AM PDT by Ugly Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Ugly Truth
I should also say, he was once declared dead, but they changed his status as information started coming in.
83 posted on 05/01/2003 7:54:17 AM PDT by Ugly Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
Before you judge Aziz, remember that for many years Saddam kept his eldest son locked up in prison, and subject to torture, as an extra inducement for Aziz to do as he was told.

"And, finally, there is the New Jersey signer, Abraham Clark.

He gave two sons to the officer corps in the Revolutionary Army. They were captured and sent to the infamous British prison hulk afloat in New York harbor known as the hell ship 'Jersey,' where 11,000 American captives were to die. The younger Clarks were treated with a special brutality because of their father. One was put in solitary and given no food. With the end almost in sight, with the war almost won, no one could have blamed Abraham Clark for acceding to the British request when they offered him his sons' lives if he would recant and come out for the King and parliament. The utter despair in this man's heart, the anguish in his very soul, must reach out to each one of us down through 200 years with his answer: 'No.'"

by Rush H. Limbaugh, Jr.

Clark saved no lives by sacrificing his sons; he endangered not one bit the fledgling nation's struggle for independence and liberty by giving in to the British tyrants and saying a few words he didn't mean. Clark was truly a man of honor.

Aziz, on the other hand, minimally allowed who knows how many thousands of Iraqis to perish, most likely slowly and in tremendous agonly, to spare his son from torture. A real man of honor, especially a true Christian, would have refused the demands of a truly evil, most likely Satanically possessed, dictator, and put his son into the protective hands of the one true God. Judging by his actions, we can reasonably conclude what kind of a "man" Aziz actually is.

84 posted on 05/01/2003 5:33:39 PM PDT by WhaChuLookinAt (Norman Liebmann: Paul Wellstone is a good Senator - finally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson