The Dini-gration of Darwinism

AgapePress ^ | April 29, 2003 | Mike S. Adams

[Heartlander]

Anyone who doubts (but understands) the ‘theory of common descent’ is not competent for a job as a physician.
Is this statement true?

I would say it is if only because any doctor that didn't at least understand it slept through school.

[Aric2000]

Nope, he's not going to, he is just gonna tell us that we are wrong and must PROVE to him that we are right.

Then he'll hit us with some other inane and dishonest post.

Then when we explain it to him and blast his argument, he will go back to we need to prove that we are right.

The TRUE definition of a TROLL, no doubt in my mind, fits the definition to a tee, or at least my definition.

[Junior]

All those amino acids have been found in interstellar dust clouds.

[Junior]

Darwin didn't cover the origin of life (he thought God might have done it). On the Origin of Species deals specifically with natural selection.

[whattajoke]

All those amino acids have been found in interstellar dust clouds.

Evolution as Cosmology of course. Everyone knows that!

[Stultis]

telling me that something is "offered" as an explanation, is not very impressive as to its validity.

Agreed. The vast majority of explantions (hypotheses or theories) "offered" in science are immediately or eventually rejected. There is only one genuinely "impressive" indication of the scientific status of a theory: that it is actually used or implicated in the ongoing research of working scientists.

By this objective criteria, evolution is part of science and creationism isn't.

[Junior]

Since we were talking about the Theory of Evolution )a scientific theory), one would need to accept the definition dealing with scientific theories.

[Heartlander]

Darwin didn't cover the origin of life (he thought God might have done it). On the Origin of Species deals specifically with natural selection.

Darwin purposed that RM&NS is all that is required for the diversity of life we now see and logically comprehend - i.e. (now with neo-darwinism) there is no target for evolution and we are just lucky to realize our own luck.

[general_re]

Evolution as Cosmology of course. Everyone knows that!

Careful, my friend - that's pretty potent stuff you're messing with ;)

[Aric2000]

LOL, GOOD ONE General!!

[ALS]

why would I be required to accept anything?

[Aric2000]

I think that he left, damn, and I was having fun playing whack-A-troll.

[ALS]

"All those amino acids have been found in interstellar dust clouds."

and?

[Aric2000]

Oh, good, HE'S BACK!!!

[Junior]

Because we require a common framework for discussions.

[Aric2000]

And what?

Figure it out Genius.....

It is about as obvious as your "I'm a troll, HIT ME", attitude.

[ALS]

"By this objective criteria, evolution is part of science and creationism isn't."

objective?
Your science, maybe.

tellya what son, go back through all and any of my posts ever on FR and show me where I said I support "creationism".


good luck

[Junior]

You pointed out that all those amino acids would have to be conveniently in one place. I pointed out that they are.

[ALS]

You seem to not only be devoid of brain matter, but have an odd fixation on trolls.

Do you have a collection?

[ALS]

"You pointed out that all those amino acids would have to be conveniently in one place. I pointed out that they are."

So you believe life came from outer space?