Skip to comments.
Protesting ‘Patriots’ - Town Among Several Vowing to Block Patriot Act Enforcement
ABCNEWS ^
| 04-27-03
Posted on 04/28/2003 3:54:54 PM PDT by Brian S
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
1
posted on
04/28/2003 3:54:54 PM PDT
by
Brian S
To: Brian S
To: Brian S
"Under this standard of terrorism," said Kimberly Crenshaw of Columbia University, "the civil rights movement, the freedom riders, the sit-in demonstrations, all of these people could conceivably have been prosecuted as terrorists."I don't see how.
To: RippleFire
Someone should introduce these people to some basic classes in law or political science. Local police hindering the FBI? Good luck.
4
posted on
04/28/2003 4:04:07 PM PDT
by
LanPB01
To: LanPB01
Someone should introduce these people to some basic classes in law or political science. Local police hindering the FBI? Good luck. The FBI exceeds their authority grossly and routinely. If a local government isn't supposed to stand up to them, who is?
5
posted on
04/28/2003 4:07:34 PM PDT
by
supercat
(TAG--you're it!)
To: supercat
Standing up to agents that are exceeded their lawful authority is one thing. Standing up to them when they are enforcing a lawfully passed act is another.
6
posted on
04/28/2003 4:13:16 PM PDT
by
LanPB01
To: Brian S
I have no use for the (un) Patriot Act.
7
posted on
04/28/2003 4:14:28 PM PDT
by
Dan from Michigan
("I have two guns. One for each of ya." - Doc Holliday)
To: LanPB01
Local police hindering the FBI? Good luck.
Well....who would you suggest to hinder the F.B.I. ?
I mean somebody needs to, from time to time,
or we can All Kiss the Bill of Rights Goodbye !
.....THUNDER......
To: Dan from Michigan
I think the Patriot Act has received a bum rap from sources that really don't know what the act actually says. However, I haven't read all of it, so maybe I'm missing something.
9
posted on
04/28/2003 4:17:37 PM PDT
by
LanPB01
To: LanPB01
I posted a ton of stuff on this when it was released, using the act itself as a source.
Offhand, my biggest problems is the Affirmative Defense provisions on assett forfeitures. That in short means guilty till proven innocent. The other is secret searches(which I have problems with anyway) that can be authorized by ANY judge, not just in the district. That's an easy opening for abuses of power.
Two names offhand. Dan Harmon. Bill Klinton.
10
posted on
04/28/2003 4:20:37 PM PDT
by
Dan from Michigan
("I have two guns. One for each of ya." - Doc Holliday)
To: Brian S
Somewhere in the background, one can hear the sound of 'dueling banjos.":~)
11
posted on
04/28/2003 4:22:01 PM PDT
by
verity
To: Brian S
Quick! Somebody needs to vote some federal subsidies for this town so they can bribe them into complacency like all the other sheeplevilles throughout the country.
12
posted on
04/28/2003 4:22:55 PM PDT
by
inquest
To: Dan from Michigan
Well, forfeiture has been a disgrace for years. I don't think anything done by the Patriot Act can compare with some of the rip-offs that have occurred by prosecutors screaming, "Drugs!" Secret searches also already happen on a regular basis. The only thing I see in the Patriot Act is it calls for a lower standard than was normally in place, and even then, it only applies to "agents of a foreign power."
13
posted on
04/28/2003 4:25:37 PM PDT
by
LanPB01
To: Dan from Michigan
I'm with you. I'll take my chances with the terrorist first before usurping the guarantees provided by the Constitution.
14
posted on
04/28/2003 4:26:18 PM PDT
by
Brian S
To: LanPB01
even then, it only applies to "agents of a foreign power." I don't think that part does.....I can't SWEAR to that though offhand.
15
posted on
04/28/2003 4:27:52 PM PDT
by
Dan from Michigan
("I have two guns. One for each of ya." - Doc Holliday)
To: Brian S
"they're ready for the fight"
Thank God some Americans are.........
16
posted on
04/28/2003 4:29:53 PM PDT
by
WhiteGuy
(MY VOTE IS FOR SALE)
To: secretagent
Funny, they said RICO would only be used against racketeers and organized crime. Yet they used it against Pro-life groups.
NEVER give the government the kind of power you don't want to see wielded against you. . .
17
posted on
04/28/2003 5:41:49 PM PDT
by
Salgak
(don't mind me: the orbital mind control lasers are making me write this. . .)
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: Brian S
I'll take my chances with the terrorist first before usurping the guarantees provided by the Constitution. So can I assume that you live in a high risk area for terror, perhaps somewhere on Manhattan or in DC? Or are you, like so many big talkers, living in an area where you are highly unlikely to ever suffer from a terrorist act?
What you really mean to say is that you're plenty willing to sacrifice the lives of urban dwellers, air travellers, or Federal employees if somehow your vague and paranoic feelings about mythical government overreaching are assuaged.
To: smallstuff
ROFLMAO
Sorry, but them Constimatooshin classes you been takin' down at Denny's ain't 'zackly been right.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson