Posted on 04/22/2003 4:54:43 AM PDT by Beenliedto
Not the heritage of the Iraqi people, you donkey, the heritage of the civilized world!
For your edification, it is highly questionable for you to even refer to an Iraqi heritage since Iraq is, historically speaking, a practically "brand new" country, invented by the Brits at the end of WWI.
Also for your edification, that's when they were in charge of world reorganization instead of just Junior Asst to GWB.
They pretty much layed out a blueprint for future conflict if not disaster. But I'm sure George will do a much better job. (/sarcasm).
Wrong. What Sean Hannity's face reflects are his feelings. He is probably the most honest guy out there. It is darn refreshing to see and hear him and know that he believes what he says and does not spin. Would you really prefer a Clinton who can arrange his face according to what he wants you to think (remember the "tears" at Ron Brown's funeral?)?
I disagree with Sean about the importance of the artifacts, yet I agree with him that it truly was not a top priority for us at the time. It is a shame, and hopefully we can recover the most important ones.
And as for railing angainst the anti-intellectualism of some of our leaders, just remember that thinking deep does not get anything done. Look at Jimmuh Carter.
What? We can't have a nice, decent, hard-working guy on our team? I agree there are very few of that breed on the opposiing team; I think we need more like Sean.
You're right of course.
It should long ago have been made part of our National Park System. (/sarcasm).
Vivid word picture and right on. Sean is like nothing more than a huge, White House trained parrot.
He must have a big a$$ to be able to pull stuff like this out of it! There's no justification for this statement whatsoever.
I'd rather be called an elephant.
OK, if you want, I'll rephrase my question: "Why is it responsibility of the US military to protect and defend the heritage of of the civilized world!"
Why does it fall to the US military? Since you seem so incredibly upset with the term: "Iraqi people" and "Iraqi heritage" then how is it that the items once belonging to the past cultures that existed in that region, now inhabited by the Iraqi people worth the life of a US soldier when the very same people don't give a fig about it? The Japanese, the Germans never looted their musuems after WWII?
We Americans have enormous pride in our cultural heritage. BUT, if the unthinkable happened, if there were looting here (say the National Archives), by the local people here, and that looting were successful, then the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence would at that moment, cease to be important documents. They would be pieces of parchment and nothing more.
A clay pot ican be a clay pot or a hallmark of the Assaryian Empire. If the locals regard it only as a clay pot to be smashed, then why should the life of one American be endangered because of it?
If he was responding to a specific person's thought process, it wasn't necessarily an ad hominem attack. What if I said that the moon was made of green cheese? Would you engage me in argument, or would you simply call me an idiot? It's one thing to call someone an idiot because you disagree with them. It's another to call them an idiot for saying and/or thinking something totally stupid. The later is not an ad hominem attack; it is a description.
I think his point was that the media never mentions this and he simply wants to make Byrd accountable for his own actions. This is descriptive and not a personal attack, as Byrd was actually a KKK member. Now if Byrd only said something that Hannity deemed racist, and used this term, then yes, I would agree with you. In that case it would be a personal attack.
When he made sense he was appreciated. I've only skimmed his rantings here, as it is littered with out and out lies. (President Bush brags he doesn't read? What a lie.)
It appears to me Reese is the one with a reading problem, else he'd be aware of more facts regarding fakes, inside jobs, etc. He seems under the false impression that all of these priceless objects were sitting in the museum on the day our troops arrived in Baghdad.
I'll not comment on his adolescent (he has the nerve to apply the term to those he dislikes? What a joke) comments regarding Sean Hannity.
Reese has been revealed as a world class clymer.
You see, George W. Bush understands---truly understands--the value of culture and such more than Reese could ever dream to.
Yet Reese fancies himself superior in the ways of the world and has Bush pegged as a hick. How wrong and contemptible Reese is for taking the path he has chosen. Sad, really.
Bull. Anti-war is often enough Anti-American; the Salon editor being only the tip of the iceberg. Many of them would love to see death in the abstract; if the death of American power and autonomy requires that real people die, then so be it.
Reese, OTOH, is just your run of the mill Anti-Semite. Whats bad for the Jews is good for Charly Reese.
Look, one needn't be on the left to think the looting was a tragedy. Truth is conservatives value history and artifacts more. It's the tiresome pointing of blame at the U.S. for "not protecting" what wasn't even there anymore that is the problem.
It contained treasures during what period can you state with certainty.
My opinion is the items were long gone before we were in Baghdad. So how is it our fault they're gone?
As usual, though, we'll lead the charge to find them and restore them to a place where all can benefit. And we'll get small thanks for that.
Even worse, had we been there guarding the place, our servicemen and women would be blamed for the "missing" items....
No, it was the heritage of the Iraqi people, and they themselves destroyed it. What's more, contrary to intitial media reports and criticism, it was a coordinated plot by insiders and employees, premeditated and totally beyond our control to prevent
Are you sure you have not embelished his quote a little? He was making the comparison to lives we had liberated and saved.
As it is, my memory not so good. If "everyone" loved this antisemetic freakshow " few short months ago" I wouldn't have been posting here then. Do you have a link of an article of his from the beginning of the year to back up your unqualififed statement?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.