'Scott Peterson is Innocent'

Time Magazine ^ | April 20, 2003 | JILL UNDERWOOD

[Devil_Anse]

Hey, Lx has a question for you at the end of Post 218. Have you answered yet?

[RGSpincich]

But you would still think that the cops would interview them, no?

They did interview them at the time of their report. A police officer took their report over the telephone and was able to ask them pertinent questions. They were eventually interviewed again after they were prompted to contact TV stations.

[RGSpincich]

In addition, there were several web cams that could have caught his actions and one in particular that would have caught him motoring to Brooks Island.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Well one thing does look fishy: that his Christmas eve fishing excursion lasted only a few minutes, much shorter than the 3 hour round trip. I have heard of folks who claim that a bad day fishing is better than a good day at work, but this would be pushing fishing fanaticism to a new high. It looks an awful lot like Scott did stuff Laci into a Christmas stocking for the fishies.

[Calvin Locke]

The Peterson threads are thicker than a herd of rhinocerros in a phone booth.

Kind of hard not to accidently click on one,
no matter how hard one tries.

I'll take extra care in the future. (-;

[RGSpincich]

Haha Very Good. Perfect family spokesman for the Petersons.

[Jackie-O]

ROFLMAO!!!

[irish_lad]

Lee Peterson: Did you folks know that there's another pregnant lady that was floating in that bay in January? Another torso and two other pregnant women missing in that area. And that place is polluted with parolees.

Oh, yah, and they all have the same DNA. Face it folks, your son murdered his son and wife. I can understand your agony at that the thought of it, but now is the time to defend the victims not the criminal. Remember, your grandson was murdered.

[Humidston]

And in fact we now hear of some guy who DID claim to see Scott there that day.

And I heard the woman who runs the marina on a phone interview with TV station: She said the groundskeeper mentioned that although Scott seemed to be having trouble getting his boat out of the water, he had a smile on his face.

[Jackie-O]

Hi all, hope you had a wonderful day.
Just got back and saw the Peterson interview...I can't believe the denial these deluded people are in!!
Not only are they as soft as $hit between the ears, I wish these interviewers would stop being so soft!!
When Wacky Jackie was going on and on about how happy Snott and Laci were and how much he adored her, I was just screaming at the tele for the interviewer to ask her, "Why was he having an AFFAIR????? Why did he tell Amber his wife was DEAD???"
Every time I hear his parents/enablers speak, the more I understand why he is the way he is.
I think in Scotty' little mind he will think that as long as MOMMY beileves my BS and keeps defending me, why should I confess?

[RGSpincich]

I think in Scotty' little mind he will think that as long as MOMMY beileves my BS and keeps defending me, why should I confess?

Somebody in that family needs to get a clue and have a family intervention. Usually it's done when a family member is having substance problems but these poor parents need a shocking wakeup. Somebody need to sit them down and MAKE them listen to the evidence against SP. And MAKE them listen to the reasons why the Mitchells and others are not credible.

[RGSpincich]

And that place is polluted with parolees.

Guess Lee is trying to imply that Laci's walk that day took her 80 miles and somebody in the Bay Area did her in.

[MissL]

Agreed, I was thinking that if my son was accused of the same or less then Scott...I would defend him until I looked like more then a fool. But he is my son and my baby and how could I think that he would be evil? BUT once I was over my outrage and looked at the evidence at hand, my son would have to answer to me if he killed my grandson. I would be mad, ashamed, in grief...on many levels but once convinced that my son was in any way connected in the death of my grandchild that would be the end and I would do what I could to make sure he would never have the chance to do that to another again. I hope that Jackie sees that reasoning.

[Jackie-O]

And MAKE them listen to the reasons why the Mitchells and others are not credible.

Exactly!!Are they living in a dream world?? Surely there has to be someone in that family that has some sense of reality or at the very least has half a brain in their head!

Are you watching Rita Crosby right now?

[Jackie-O]

Hi DA!
Freepmail call!

[RGSpincich]

Rita?

Just a little.

[beckett]

Why would Scott talk about going to the water at all, had he taken Laci's body out there in a tarp and dumped it? There were no witnesses. Why would he place himself at the general scene of the crime?

He had no way to know who may have witnessed him in the area near the water, or on his journey to and from the water. Naturally he had to assume someone saw him. He was out in public, after all. So he constructed an alibi that a) depended on the hope that his wife's weighted body would stay submerged, and b) assumed he had been seen on his "fishing trip."

[bonfire]

Re: Darlie Routier. I was at Baylor Hospital visiting a patient in intensive care during the time Darlie was there. Met her mother and felt devastated for their family. Then I saw the cemetary silly string party on TV........

[Lancey Howard]

Why would he go 80 miles fishing, come home with a receipt and buy gas and food along the way, have a receipt of the dock and tell the police exactly where he went fishing — and the body would be there! That does not make sense. It's too damn inconvenient for that.

It sure sounds to me like Jackie is saying that the police must have planted the bodies.

[Lancey Howard]

As guilty as Scott appears to me, I still would not like the police to get the idea in their head that I had done something wrong. Once that happens everything is tailored to fit that conception.

Unfortunately, that is all too true. And if it later turns out that the convicted person is completely innocent, it is nearly impossible to get the DA to admit that they prosecuted the wrong person. Ed Rendell, when he was Philadelphia DA, convicted a guy and put him on death row and it turned out that the guy was the wrong guy. It took over a year AFTER it was clear that a completely innocent man was convicted (this guy had no connection to the case whatsoever) to get him released. (The real killers were eventually convicted in the case.)