Skip to comments.
Threading instruction improves weak children's arithmetic
Eurakalert ^
| Apr 11, 2003
| Nalinie Moerlie
Posted on 04/16/2003 9:30:44 PM PDT by Diddley
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: Diddley
I wish I had taken the time to learn this.
I've gotten lazy -- I don't like to do simple arithmatic without a calculator.
If pressed, I could do most arithmatic with a pencil and paper. Give me trig tables, and I could do that too. But a calculator is so much quicker, and less likely to make a mistake (and a scientific calc is what? $10?)
21
posted on
04/16/2003 10:25:49 PM PDT
by
jude24
("Facts? You can use facts to prove anything that's even REMOTELY true!" - Homer Simpson)
To: antaresequity
Works for multiplication too Perhaps you should explain in more detail, since your example seems 147,100 short.
BTW, there is a cool trick to division I discovered, which is of limitted usefulness when doing maths by hand, but makes division fundamentally parallelizable. I wonder if PGP or other such programs use any such technique?
22
posted on
04/16/2003 10:32:41 PM PDT
by
supercat
(TAG--you're it!)
To: antaresequity
Please tell me this is a joke. I hope you're not a school teacher.
23
posted on
04/16/2003 10:41:45 PM PDT
by
TAdorno
To: jude24
. . . But a calculator is so much quicker, and less likely to make a mistake You are right.
A person "needs" to learn how to "do" math, so that he/she can decide what procedure to use and to evaluate answers for reasonableness.
However - as one who has used math for 6 decades - I now find that I "depend" on a calculator.
24
posted on
04/16/2003 10:43:56 PM PDT
by
Diddley
(Liberals: If you have a good story, why lie?)
To: supercat
Your right...I went to fast
Basically its like this...simpler example
87 x 34=
80 x 30
80 x 4
7 x 30
7 x 4
or 2400 320 210 28 =
the idea is to break the it into memory manageable modules
Sorry
To: Sacajaweau
too many beers tonite see lower post sorry
No im not a school teacher...i was trying to convey a method that I use for multiplication beyond the tables
like for instance this simple example 17 x 28
thats the same as 10 x 28 or 280 and
7 x 28 which is 7 x 20 + 56
which is 280 + 140 + 56
when you multiply it is a ton quicker that way
break it into memory sized chunks that are easy base ten units
To: Diddley
Gee, I'm so glad I read this. My nine-year-old son has a learning disability and has a horrible time just doing the simplest arithmetic. We have struggled and studied but nothing seems to help. Maybe this would.
27
posted on
04/16/2003 11:01:30 PM PDT
by
Capriole
(Foi vainquera)
To: Diddley
Gee, I'm so glad I read this. My nine-year-old son has a learning disability and has a horrible time just doing the simplest arithmetic. We have struggled and studied but nothing seems to help. Maybe this would.
28
posted on
04/16/2003 11:01:55 PM PDT
by
Capriole
(Foi vainquera)
To: antaresequity
(slaps forehead...)
If you have any other tricks FReep me!!! (Homeschooling two.)
29
posted on
04/16/2003 11:11:58 PM PDT
by
Marie
(If bad spelling is an indicator of a brilliant mind, then I'm a total genious.)
To: Capriole
, , , nothing seems to help. Maybe this would. It might indeed.
There are many techniques that a creative teacher can use to get "non-standard" learners to learn.
Good luck.
[FReepmail me, if you wish]
30
posted on
04/16/2003 11:34:17 PM PDT
by
Diddley
(Liberals: If you have a good story, why lie?)
To: Diddley
Don't get me wrong. If pressed, I can do chemistry/calculus without a calculator.
I just don't like to.
31
posted on
04/17/2003 5:30:50 AM PDT
by
jude24
("Facts? You can use facts to prove anything that's even REMOTELY true!" - Homer Simpson)
To: Sacajaweau
I agree about the "art" projects in the lower grades....sheesh....but, not ALL teachers have bad attitudes, really, but a lot of them, I think give up to the Union and Fed Gov't mandates, and the fact that they cannot improve THEIR lot over another teachers by virtue of "performance." (I think the education system is a great example of SOCIALISM.)
32
posted on
04/17/2003 8:06:25 AM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(CNN...the MOST TRUSTED in News......by CRIMINALS!)
To: Thane_Banquo
"That's the way I've always done it."
Me too! Who knew we were ahead of our times? They take the best tried and true way to do something, give it a fancy name and make it sound like they just invented it. Typical of educators.
33
posted on
04/17/2003 8:10:26 AM PDT
by
seams2me
To: jude24
Don't get me wrong. No, I didn't get you wrong. I feel the same way.
34
posted on
04/17/2003 11:07:13 AM PDT
by
Diddley
(Liberals: If you have a good story, why lie?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson