Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shock and awe not only for Iraqis {The "Fair" tax cometh}
WorldNetDaily ^ | 4/16/2003 | By Joan Veon

Posted on 04/16/2003 7:28:39 AM PDT by George Frm Br00klyn Park

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-283 next last
Comment #161 Removed by Moderator

To: Always Right
It is the individual who is liable for the tax.

This much should be obvious. It is the individual who pays the tax.

However, it is the business who is liable for showing that the tax has been paid, NOT the individual. Further, the business is paid for this service under the nrst.

162 posted on 04/17/2003 12:26:48 PM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

Comment #163 Removed by Moderator

To: Dick Bachert
Uh, the new excise tax bureaucracy would be in addition to the sales tax bureaucracy...I made the false assumption you had enough knowledge of the sales tax plan to know that.
164 posted on 04/17/2003 12:45:27 PM PDT by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Principled
However, it is the business who is liable for showing that the tax has been paid, NOT the individual. Further, the business is paid for this service under the nrst.

Here is a link to one of the most recents NRST bills up for consideration. Notice that it is solely the individual that is punished.

165 posted on 04/17/2003 12:47:11 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Link is only temporty, here is the text:

`SEC. 505. PENALTIES.

`For interest due on late payments, see section 6601.

`SEC. 506. BURDEN OF PERSUASION AND BURDEN OF PRODUCTION.

`SEC. 507. ATTORNEYS' AND ACCOUNTANCY FEES.

`SEC. 508. SUMMONS, EXAMINATIONS, AUDITS, ETC.

`SEC. 509. RECORDS.

`SEC. 510. TAX TO BE SEPARATELY STATED AND CHARGED.

`SEC. 511. COORDINATION WITH TITLE 11.

`SEC. 512. APPLICABLE INTEREST RATE.

`CHAPTER 6--COLLECTIONS; APPEALS; TAXPAYER RIGHTS

`SEC. 601. COLLECTIONS.

`SEC. 602. POWER TO LEVY, ETC.


166 posted on 04/17/2003 12:49:41 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Your link doesn't work.

In HR 25, the "Fair Tax", it is the BUSINESS who is liable for being able to prove the tax has been paid, NOT the individual. That's one of the basic, fundamental pillars of the bill.

I have no idea what bill you're trying to link.

167 posted on 04/17/2003 12:51:33 PM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
EEE, some comments on your post.
1. Manufacturers don't pay taxes on raw materials that are destined for products. These materials are exempt. If you are implying that the income tax that the producer paid is included in the cost of the raw material, you are correct.
2. Same comment about taxes on products sold to sellers.
3. Only state and local taxes are levied on products being sold to consumers.
4. 1, 2 and 3 do not account for excise taxes, which are another animal entirely.
5. Under the NRST, how do you deal with the black market? 20-30% savings is quite an incentive for sales outside the government's control. I believe this is an issue in countries with VATs much lower than 20-30%.
6. The gradual payment (payroll deduction) plan is, IMHO, what got us into the tax mess we have now. If people had to write a check to Uncle Sam every April 15th for the entire amount of taxes they owe their would be a tax revolt in this country immediately. If I have to hear one more idiot tell me "the government had to refund $x to me" as if it were a good thing I may be in jail soon.
7. In the past 20 years my state has more than doubled the sales tax. How, by billing the increases as "only 1%", "only a penny", etc. How would you prevent this with NRST?

My solution (for all to take shots at) is a flat tax, no deductions (the famous "postcard" tax return"). All taxes are due the day before the general election date in November. That keeps the tax rate and election tied in everyone's mind, with instant feedback to the elected officials. Again, IMHO, that is the best way to get lower taxes rather than higher.
168 posted on 04/17/2003 12:52:30 PM PDT by 3Lean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Zon
With the NRST if a person doesn't want to pay the tax they can choose to not buy the item -- and they can still get a check every month to cover the tax up to the poverty level

Is getting a welfare check every month supposed to impress me? Where does that money come from?

169 posted on 04/17/2003 12:52:30 PM PDT by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Taxman; ancient_geezer
more attempts at misinfo...
170 posted on 04/17/2003 12:54:42 PM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: George Frm Br00klyn Park
NRST...It is DESIGNED to put the onus on those who are starting out, and must buy EVERYTHING in order to JUST get by.

If you exempt food, clothing and shelter from the tax, then the onus would not be on those people, who spend some 90% of their income on these items.

171 posted on 04/17/2003 12:58:54 PM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
Is getting a welfare check every month supposed to impress me? Where does that money come from?

The REBATE is not welfare, as welfare is transferred from other individuals. A REBATE is money already paid. Folks who receive the rebate are just receiving the money they'll pay in taxes on necessities. It's not a transfer from any other individual....it is money paid back to yourself...just like any REBATE. Look it up.

172 posted on 04/17/2003 12:59:07 PM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

And shove it up your ass while you are at it asshole.--Always Right

ROTFL!!!

That is absolutely hilarious -- a real gem. No wonder you're always right.

173 posted on 04/17/2003 1:07:05 PM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt

Libertarian don't get elected, why would I read their platform?

You said you lean libertarian, so naturally I thought you knew the platform. As I said, I'm not a libertarian, but I have read the platform. Libertarians do get elected, so your wrong on that count.

Zon: The flat tax involves government initiation of force and or threat of force -- "report your income and pay the tax or we'll fine you and put you in prison".

That is the visceral hatred I think could be tapped over time to return us to a pre-1913 American republic free from the DC tax regime; a return to true federalism.

The graduated income tax and flat income tax feeds that "visceral hatred" because they both sanction the initiation of force and threat of force against taxpayers. The national retail sales tax (NRST) doesn't feed it it eliminates the sanction.

These days I lean rather Jeffersonian I guess.

"No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another, and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him." -- Thomas Jefferson

For what it is worth, NST advocates semm more interested in abolishing the IRS than destroying the DC tax regime.

It's the national retail sales tax (NRST), not national sales tax. There's a very big difference, but you already know that. Your opinion is noted.

But if you eliminate the collection at the docks and just slap a tax on it, the power of the Fed will grow as monetary policy will determine the price of imports.

Tax reform is not the end all be all. Tax reform is but one of five key components to resolving the leviathan-government problem.

174 posted on 04/17/2003 1:08:01 PM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

Is getting a welfare check every month supposed to impress me?

It's not a welfare check. It's a way to recover the tax that must be paid on necessities, like food and medicine, which aren't taxed now, up to the poverty level for each household. A 23% percent retail sales tax on necessities would be far to heavy a burden on the poor thus the reason for the tax probate check. It's not a welfare check and it has been explained to you several times how and why it's not a welfare check. It makes no difference to me how you chose to present yourself -- it's your credibility, not mine.

You're the one person on the tax threads that has, by far, most discredited themselves. You're the undisputed champion, lewislynn.

175 posted on 04/17/2003 1:30:22 PM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Zon
That is absolutely hilarious -- a real gem. No wonder you're always right.

Thanks, too bad it was deleted as was the post that prompted the well deserved comment.

176 posted on 04/17/2003 1:48:27 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Thanks,

Ahem, breaking the rules of the person's "living room" (forum) you've been invited into and "crapping on the floor" (making a blatant personal attack against another guest) is not something to be applauded. I wasn't applauding you -- scorn or ridicule perhaps, but applauds or praise, most certainly not.

177 posted on 04/17/2003 2:00:33 PM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Zon
Z, Joe and Jane "Sixpack" don't influence politicians. Millionaires do. If people making millions of dollars had to pay the same rate as on their income, they would be clamoring to get that rate lowered. While sipping their favorite beverage, under the NRST, they would probably talk about the government supplied amenities we "all" should have. Concert halls, museums, ballparks and arenas, race tracks, etc and conclude that the tax rate needs to be raised. It's already happened. It caused the Boston tea party. Your utopia just don't exist. Peace and love, George.
178 posted on 04/17/2003 2:02:04 PM PDT by George Frm Br00klyn Park (FREEDOM!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Zon
A personal attack prompted my personal attack, buddy.
179 posted on 04/17/2003 2:10:45 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Zon
I have yet to find one of you NRST zealots who do not engage in personal attacks. Everytime someone comes in and suggests an opposing opinion they are personally attacked. So get off your hypocritical high horse.
180 posted on 04/17/2003 2:12:42 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-283 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson