Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why is it always the French?
Toronto Star ^ | April 8, 2003 | JEAN-BENOÎT NADEAU AND JULIE BARLOW

Posted on 04/09/2003 2:26:30 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Defending the French. An impossible task.
1 posted on 04/09/2003 2:26:30 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
what this article basically could say to shorten it is

@The french havent grasped the fact they are no longer important@
2 posted on 04/09/2003 2:30:34 AM PDT by may18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: may18

3 posted on 04/09/2003 2:35:43 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
"Why the french"

Shallow pool, gene.

4 posted on 04/09/2003 2:40:15 AM PDT by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
They see themselves the elite of the elite - superior beings - more intellectual, more cultured than the rest of the world.
5 posted on 04/09/2003 2:41:21 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Why are the French so often labelled as reactionary, protectionist, racist, Anglophobic and anti-American, not to mention immoral, self-interested and rude?

Because they are? This is not just an American view either. I have been to England and Italy. The best I can tell they also hate the French. Why? See above.

6 posted on 04/09/2003 2:42:03 AM PDT by Fzob (Why does this tag line keep showing up?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exnavy
They haven't a clue.
7 posted on 04/09/2003 2:42:14 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Who but the French remember that one condition for receiving billions of American dollars of aid for reconstruction was that European countries had to allow the free entry of American cinema?

Oh the inhumanity!

Laffing...

Can you believe it?

8 posted on 04/09/2003 2:45:00 AM PDT by tictoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fzob; tictoc; All
A Boston Herald editorial April 6, 2003 Time to tell French to pound le sand [Full Text] The ugliness of the anti-war sentiment unleashed by France's leaders has reached such a fever pitch that even they have become embarrassed by it. (And who knew the president of France was even capable of embarrassment?)

More than a week ago a group of anti-war hoodlums defaced the graves of British soldiers killed during World War I and buried in the northern city of Etaples.

``Dig up your rubbish, it is contaminating our soil,'' read one of the spray-painted messages. ``Saddam will win and he will make you bleed,'' said another. Red swastikas also marred the headstones.

The incident prompted a personal letter of apology from French President Jacques Chirac to Britain's Queen Elizabeth, which said, in part, ``You know that at a time when your soldiers are engaged in combat, the thoughts of the French are naturally with them.''

That is, as the French would so eloquently put it, merde.

Because just days before Chirac sent his heartfelt note of apology, a poll appeared in Le Monde that found 33 percent of the French people hope Britain and the United States lose the war against Iraq.

This has been a week of serial apologizing in France. (It seemed the closer coalition troops got to Baghdad, the more earnest were the apologies.) It began Monday with Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin saying, ``Just because we're against this war doesn't mean we want dictatorship to defeat democracy. We are in the democratic camp. The Americans are not enemies.''

On Tuesday, Raffarin told his nation's parliament, ``It is indispensable to be vigilant against all displays of anti-Americanism, which would be unacceptable.''

On Wednesday, his spokesman added, ``We have no leniency toward the Iraqi regime. Of course, we want to see Saddam Hussein's regime ended.''

Even German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder joined the ``old Europe'' chorus of those singing a slightly different tune this week. In a speech to the German parliament, he called for ``the defeat of the dictatorship'' in Iraq, but never mentioned who might actually be doing the ``defeating.''

Well, Saddam will be defeated and that is what the French and German governments fear most: a free Iraq, grateful to its liberators and its new allies and with no particular need to curry favor with those who made a nice, fat living doing business with Saddam.

This is no longer about freedom fries and boycotts of fine Bordeaux. This is about trade and reconstruction contracts and the future of Saddam's favorite oil company, TotalFinaElf.

So, how do you say ``go pound sand'' in French? [End]

9 posted on 04/09/2003 2:46:09 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All
It's also time we reclaimed our technological edge and space launch position.
10 posted on 04/09/2003 2:50:21 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
A never-never land article. Threatening a veto is not just opposed to the war, it is a direct attack on the US policy and made a sham of the UN resolutions. And leaving NATO was not a gesture, but another rebuff to the US. Taking the Turkey option out was damaging to the US in opening another front and has slowed the movement in the North.

Dumb article.
11 posted on 04/09/2003 2:54:18 AM PDT by KeyWest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyWest
dumb article

It's hard to defend them. Speaking of dumb.

Mon Apr 7, 2003 - Bottle deposit takes fizz out of German beer sales [Full Text] BONN (AFP) - Environmentally friendly rules imposing a deposit on cans of drink have led to a sharp fall in beer sales, Germany's main brewing organisation said. The German Brewers' Union said the fall in sales of cans and bottles liable to the deposit had not been compensated for by a corresponding upturn in sales of reusable containers.

Its head, Peter Hahn, said brewers reckoned on a drop of up to 10 million hectolitres this year alone, which could endanger thousands of jobs. Germans are already famously obsessive about recycling. Citizens carefully separate waste into as many as four separate containers, and many supermarkets give shoppers a refund at the checkout. The new rules, which took effect at the start of the year, put a deposit of 25 to 50 euro cents on carbonated drinks such as beer, fizzy mineral water and lemonade. The aim is to turn Germans even more off non-reusable containers and encourage them to take their refuse back to the shop where they bought it, provided they have proof of purchase. [End]

12 posted on 04/09/2003 2:58:28 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
France stands aside and lets Hitler take their country. The USA buries 5000 re-taking France, and gives it back to them...no charge. Fast forward 58 years...The USA asks France to stand aside (their specialty) so it can defend itself against a heavily armed Iraqi nutjob, eliminating a humanitarian nightmare in the bargain. The French response: not only do they actively obstruct, but they do so in a manner calculated to create maximum embarrassment to the USA. They are unbelievable weasels who deserve decades of badwill for what they've done.
13 posted on 04/09/2003 3:05:09 AM PDT by shteebo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
"Just imagine what U.S. foreign policy would be if Muslims outnumbered Hispanics."

Jeez!....I just woke up..That Thought is gonna cast a shadow over the entire day! :^(

14 posted on 04/09/2003 3:34:33 AM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
(Who but the French remember that one condition for receiving billions of American dollars of aid for reconstruction was that European countries had to allow the free entry of American cinema?)

Seems like a pretty good deal for the European countries, IMHO.

The author implies that the French still remember this bitterly, for some unknown reason. No one was forced to go watch an American film, were they?
15 posted on 04/09/2003 3:44:30 AM PDT by Pukka Puck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
glance at any French phone book will show that the purebred, old-stock French barely form a majority in France.

but the French are French in much the same way that the Crees are Cree, the Navajos are Navajo, the Danes are Dane and the Japanese are Japanese.

Trying to have it both ways.

We moved to France for a two-year fellowship to study why the French resist globalization.

So we get the idea where this couple is coming from. These authors get paid to be global lefties. A fellowship from whom, I wonder?

16 posted on 04/09/2003 3:53:28 AM PDT by Yeti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


17 posted on 04/09/2003 4:00:55 AM PDT by KneelBeforeZod (Deus Lo Volt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Like the U.S., France has overseas properties that are an integral part of its national territory - Guadeloupe, Martinique, French Guyana, St-Pierre et Miquelon, French Polynesia, New Caledonia and Reunion. This makes France a neighbour of Canada, Brazil, the United States, Australia and Madagascar.

This is a stretch. I think we only have one overseas property, Guam, if you don't count Puerto Rico, which is more than a property. It sounds to me that the French government is a lot more imperialistic than the U.S. How come we don't here about that?

It is the world's second biggest exporter of weapons.

Well, now who are they exporting these weapons to? I would bet mostly these terrorist countries. Who are they second to? My guess is Russia, because if it were us then they surely would have mentioned that in this oh so subtle slam piece to America.

18 posted on 04/09/2003 4:03:21 AM PDT by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yeti
SIXTY MILLION FRENCHMEN CAN'T BE WRONG: France in the Era of Globalization By Jean Benoît Nadeau and Julie Barlow Sourcebooks (NYP)

For most Americans, France is more puzzling, exasperating, bemusing, and downright inexplicable than any other country on earth. The French beguile, befuddle and infuriate us all at once. And no wonder: to American eyes France looks like one giant paradox. Consider: The French smoke, drink and eat more fat than anyone in the world, yet they live longer and have fewer heart problems than Americans…. In spite of high taxes, a bloated civil service, a huge national debt, snarls of red tape, double-digit unemployment and low incentives for entrepreneurs, France has the world's highest productivity index, is the fourth biggest economic power and has become Europe's economic powerhouse…. Although France ranks as the world's third largest exporter, the French rant against globalization seems hysterical - at least to American ears.

In SIXTY MILLION FRENCHMEN CAN'T BE WRONG: France in the Era of Globalization two bicultural Canadian journalists explore the soul of France, explain what's behind the paradoxes, penetrate the enigma of French culture and reveal how they see globalization. To find the answers, the authors take readers along on a journey through the French psyche, from working-class neighborhoods in Paris to the mosques of Marseille to the MacDonald's trashed by French peasants. The result is a book that traces the source of the misperceptions about France and shows how the country really works. France not only functions differently from the U.S.; the French see the world differently and always have.

Both veteran journalists, the authors came to France with a grant from a New Hampshire-based private foundation to study why the French resist globalization. Jean Benoît Nadeau and Julie Barlow approached France like anthropologists, making friends, finding an apartment and interrogating all facets of life. Using their skills as cross-cultural analysts, they were able to solve riddles and debunk myths where other observers saw only stupidity, narrow-mindedness or just plain old French orneriness.

E-Mail us at nepa@nepa.com if you are interested in obtaining the rights for this book. Please let us know which rights you are seeking.

19 posted on 04/09/2003 4:05:00 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
That pic....XLSMcQSEG!!!! You're killin' me.
20 posted on 04/09/2003 4:26:25 AM PDT by 12B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson