Skip to comments.
‘Cyber Hall of Shame’ targets delinquent taxpayers (Colorado)
Channel 9 News, Denver, Colorado ^
| 27 March 2003
| Adam Schrager
Posted on 03/27/2003 8:06:17 AM PST by PatrioticAmerican
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: Roscoe
"I suspect that I might know more about the reliablity of such information than you."
I suspect that you don't.
To: PatrioticAmerican
I suspect It would seem that you suspect the public records without really having any knowledge of the matter.
22
posted on
03/28/2003 12:50:19 AM PST
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
"It would seem that you suspect the public records without really having any knowledge of the matter."
I already said that I work with state records, so what's your expertise as to be able to say that public records are good to go for publication?
You don't have such expertise, do you? You're simply are trying to take a pro-government stance without providing any logical backup to your claim that these records are sound.
It isn't my responsibility to prove these records are not sound. It is the state's responsibility to prove that they are before using them as a source for publication.
Your stance is that they are because you know they must be. So prove it.
To: PatrioticAmerican
I already said that I work with state records And you've also falsely claimed that such records are notoriously inaccurate, without a speck of evidence to support your claim. Naturally.
24
posted on
03/28/2003 7:58:04 AM PST
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
The proof that these records are valid for publication is still in your court. Besides, what do you want from me? A million dolla study to show proof? To you, no proof is enough proof, so pound sand. I suggest that you look at the analysis documents already available for public consumption. Do your own homework and ask the state for them. They do exist.
Your reputation as a FReeper who believes that the government is always right preceeds you.
To: PatrioticAmerican
The proof that these records are valid for publication is still in your court. Backwards. You charged that the records were "notoriously innaccurate" [sic] and when you were called on to support your accusation, you folded.
26
posted on
03/28/2003 12:47:02 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: PatrioticAmerican; Roscoe
What's with you Roscoe? What makes you so cranky?
16 -PA-
As we see, there is ~never~ a true straight answer from roscoe. -- Whatever is said, whatever the question, roscoe 'begs' to differ, based on his own personal infalliblity.
Just ask him, he's always right.
27
posted on
03/28/2003 4:10:35 PM PST
by
tpaine
To: tpaine
In
the
land
of
the
blind
the
one-eyed
man
is
king.
28
posted on
03/28/2003 7:05:24 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
What'd I say.. Just ask roscoe.
29
posted on
03/28/2003 9:07:31 PM PST
by
tpaine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson