Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China readies for future U.S. fight
CNN ^ | 3/25/03 | Willy Wo-Lap Lam

Posted on 03/26/2003 8:20:29 PM PST by AnimalLover

Edited on 04/29/2004 2:02:17 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: Poohbah
To dismiss Lam as an idiot is to abandon one's credibility regarding China, at any rate.
41 posted on 03/27/2003 3:53:15 PM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (They have been warned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Well, Lam may have an insight into what China's leaders *want* to do.

The problem is that China is a long ways away from actually being able to do it, and their economy looks suspiciously like Enron's balance sheet writ out on a nation-state scale.

As we said when I was a (much younger than I am now :o) jarhead, "want into one hand, s**t into the other, and tell me which one fills up first."
42 posted on 03/27/2003 3:55:59 PM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Nayt2
china isn't capable of attacking the us in the forseeable future.

All depends on what is in those millions of shipping containers besides consumer electronics. Those ships too could be used to transport other "containers". Just as the Brits used container ships to transport all sorts of stuff to the Falklands, including operating radar sets, Harrier jets and other war like stores. They even used one ship as a make do aircraft carrier. (For the Harriers).

Of course container ships are also big and slow targets for all sorts of things that go boom!

43 posted on 03/27/2003 4:47:53 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
In short, please give us a coherent theory of victory for the Chinese in the scenario you describe.

Victory? I don't think so. But an opportunity to hurt a nation they perceive as an enemy, with plausible deniability (how do we prove that it wasn't Islamofascist terrorists) would be appealing to them.

Kind of like the street punk who vandalizes vehicles because he resents the "rich" owners. If he's not caught, he's "won", but he's won nothing.

44 posted on 03/27/2003 8:14:51 PM PST by JimRed (Disinformation is the leftist's and enemy's friend; consider the source before believing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
Victory? I don't think so. But an opportunity to hurt a nation they perceive as an enemy, with plausible deniability (how do we prove that it wasn't Islamofascist terrorists) would be appealing to them.

A large-scale device, exploding in a COSCO hull, with fallout showing that the nuclear material came from China is pretty much a case of the ChiComs shouting "WE DID IT, PLEASE VAPORIZE US!"

There's a reason the USSR never tried any of this stuff during the Cold War--it's a lot easier to ID the source of the bomb than most laymen think.

45 posted on 03/28/2003 5:24:14 AM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson