Skip to comments.
Ashleigh Banfield "UCMJ=Guilty Until Proven Innocent" (Vanity)
MSNBC Report ^
| March 26, 2003
| TankerKC
Posted on 03/26/2003 6:04:41 PM PST by TankerKC
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
To: TankerKC
GLad to help, I'm intimately familiar with Article 15 if you have any questions there. :-}
41
posted on
03/26/2003 6:24:05 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: TankerKC
Akbar admitted his guilt before he was sent to jail in Germany. Therefore, there's no question of proving guilt.
To: TankerKC
It's true in France, which retains the Napoleonic Code. Not true under UCMJ.
43
posted on
03/26/2003 6:25:06 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Bogey78O
LOL! Yes, see Janeane Garafolo!
44
posted on
03/26/2003 6:25:21 PM PST
by
annyokie
(provacative yet educational reading alert)
To: dinok
military is subject to the constitution. this is not complicated.
while you might be tinker with evidentiary standards and cut short appeals, you can't shift the burden of proof altogether.
To: MindBender26
Also remember by the time you reach a courts marshal you are usually guilty. If your not whomever brought the charges would get his or her butt in a sling. At least thats how it worked in the USMC.
46
posted on
03/26/2003 6:25:28 PM PST
by
gocats
To: cynicom
Like I said. Who stands on equal footing with Saddam?
Peers has more of a looser translation in the judicial sense it seems.
47
posted on
03/26/2003 6:25:39 PM PST
by
Bogey78O
(check it out... http://freepers.zill.net/users/bogey78o_fr/puppet.swf)
To: Bogey78O
I do not believe the beyond reasonable doubt idea means anything anymore.
The only time I saw it used was with O.J.
To: Cicero
Oddly enough Louisiana has a good bit of it's bedrock on Napoleanic code.
Our inheritance system is the most glaring example.
49
posted on
03/26/2003 6:27:27 PM PST
by
Bogey78O
(check it out... http://freepers.zill.net/users/bogey78o_fr/puppet.swf)
To: TankerKC
Yes, and if you're nice you can see them. Not flirting.
50
posted on
03/26/2003 6:27:27 PM PST
by
annyokie
(provacative yet educational reading alert)
To: jwalsh07
51
posted on
03/26/2003 6:27:28 PM PST
by
nwrep
To: Bogey78O

Some body stop me!
52
posted on
03/26/2003 6:27:45 PM PST
by
TankerKC
To: the Deejay
Akbar admitted his guilt before he was sent to jail in Germany. Therefore, there's no question of proving guilt.
Statement won't be admissible, he wasn't read his rights. Of course, the prosecutor might be able to get around the rules of evidence by using an exception to the hearsay rules, like FRE 803(2) - excited utterance.
To: cynicom
when an enlisted man does to trial by court martial there is an entitlement to have enlisted sitting the board. I sat many in my active duty years.
Its usually not a good idea as the enlisted tend to be more severe than officers.
54
posted on
03/26/2003 6:28:30 PM PST
by
FRMAG
Comment #55 Removed by Moderator
To: Bogey78O
Ever see an enlisted person sit on a court martial board for an officer????
56
posted on
03/26/2003 6:29:18 PM PST
by
cynicom
To: TankerKC
Hehe...put on EMO glasses, recite some angst filled poetry, and you have the modern hipster.
57
posted on
03/26/2003 6:29:37 PM PST
by
Bogey78O
(check it out... http://freepers.zill.net/users/bogey78o_fr/puppet.swf)
To: TankerKC
Well I was involved in one Courts-Martial (and many Article 15s), and I found the soldier innocent.
58
posted on
03/26/2003 6:30:01 PM PST
by
Yasotay
To: cynicom
See post 54
59
posted on
03/26/2003 6:30:23 PM PST
by
Bogey78O
(check it out... http://freepers.zill.net/users/bogey78o_fr/puppet.swf)
To: cynicom
Enlisted are entitled to have another enlisted. Their choice. Officers, however, have no choice.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson