Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ashleigh Banfield "UCMJ=Guilty Until Proven Innocent" (Vanity)
MSNBC Report ^ | March 26, 2003 | TankerKC

Posted on 03/26/2003 6:04:41 PM PST by TankerKC

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: TankerKC
GLad to help, I'm intimately familiar with Article 15 if you have any questions there. :-}
41 posted on 03/26/2003 6:24:05 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC
Akbar admitted his guilt before he was sent to jail in Germany. Therefore, there's no question of proving guilt.
42 posted on 03/26/2003 6:24:20 PM PST by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC
It's true in France, which retains the Napoleonic Code. Not true under UCMJ.
43 posted on 03/26/2003 6:25:06 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
LOL! Yes, see Janeane Garafolo!
44 posted on 03/26/2003 6:25:21 PM PST by annyokie (provacative yet educational reading alert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: dinok
military is subject to the constitution. this is not complicated.

while you might be tinker with evidentiary standards and cut short appeals, you can't shift the burden of proof altogether.
45 posted on 03/26/2003 6:25:24 PM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Also remember by the time you reach a courts marshal you are usually guilty. If your not whomever brought the charges would get his or her butt in a sling. At least thats how it worked in the USMC.
46 posted on 03/26/2003 6:25:28 PM PST by gocats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Like I said. Who stands on equal footing with Saddam?

Peers has more of a looser translation in the judicial sense it seems.
47 posted on 03/26/2003 6:25:39 PM PST by Bogey78O (check it out... http://freepers.zill.net/users/bogey78o_fr/puppet.swf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
I do not believe the beyond reasonable doubt idea means anything anymore.

The only time I saw it used was with O.J.

48 posted on 03/26/2003 6:26:22 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Oddly enough Louisiana has a good bit of it's bedrock on Napoleanic code.

Our inheritance system is the most glaring example.
49 posted on 03/26/2003 6:27:27 PM PST by Bogey78O (check it out... http://freepers.zill.net/users/bogey78o_fr/puppet.swf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC
Yes, and if you're nice you can see them. Not flirting.
50 posted on 03/26/2003 6:27:27 PM PST by annyokie (provacative yet educational reading alert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

51 posted on 03/26/2003 6:27:28 PM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
Some body stop me!
52 posted on 03/26/2003 6:27:45 PM PST by TankerKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
Akbar admitted his guilt before he was sent to jail in Germany. Therefore, there's no question of proving guilt.

Statement won't be admissible, he wasn't read his rights. Of course, the prosecutor might be able to get around the rules of evidence by using an exception to the hearsay rules, like FRE 803(2) - excited utterance.

53 posted on 03/26/2003 6:28:16 PM PST by meisterbrewer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
when an enlisted man does to trial by court martial there is an entitlement to have enlisted sitting the board. I sat many in my active duty years.

Its usually not a good idea as the enlisted tend to be more severe than officers.
54 posted on 03/26/2003 6:28:30 PM PST by FRMAG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #55 Removed by Moderator

To: Bogey78O
Ever see an enlisted person sit on a court martial board for an officer????
56 posted on 03/26/2003 6:29:18 PM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC
Hehe...put on EMO glasses, recite some angst filled poetry, and you have the modern hipster.
57 posted on 03/26/2003 6:29:37 PM PST by Bogey78O (check it out... http://freepers.zill.net/users/bogey78o_fr/puppet.swf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC
Well I was involved in one Courts-Martial (and many Article 15s), and I found the soldier innocent.
58 posted on 03/26/2003 6:30:01 PM PST by Yasotay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
See post 54
59 posted on 03/26/2003 6:30:23 PM PST by Bogey78O (check it out... http://freepers.zill.net/users/bogey78o_fr/puppet.swf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Enlisted are entitled to have another enlisted. Their choice. Officers, however, have no choice.
60 posted on 03/26/2003 6:30:35 PM PST by meisterbrewer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson