To: kattracks
Doubtful. You can't have a second chemical weapons factory siting until you confirm the first. As is, the Pentagon is backpedeling on the first story.
3 posted on
03/23/2003 9:18:42 PM PST by
CatOwner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
To: CatOwner
Please take your spin to the appropriate web site.....
To: CatOwner
Nonsense, the Pentagon never claimed it was a chemical weapons plant.
To: CatOwner
I dunno, how many chemical factories are run my a general? Or another way: doesn't the fact that the chemical factory is run by a general lead to a presumption that it is for military purposes? It could be legit, (e.g., high explosives, sun screen) but time will tell.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson