Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq May Use Mobile Launchers to Take Aim at Troops Moving North
New York Times ^ | 3/22/03 | MICHAEL R. GORDON

Posted on 03/22/2003 12:41:31 PM PST by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 03/22/2003 12:41:31 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks; *war_list; W.O.T.; 11th_VA; Libertarianize the GOP; Free the USA; knak; MadIvan; ...
Saddam must still be around!

OFFICIAL BUMP(TOPIC)LIST

2 posted on 03/22/2003 12:49:58 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Where is Saddam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *miltech
b
3 posted on 03/22/2003 12:51:40 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Where is Saddam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
sound to me someone is gaining contol now in the regime
4 posted on 03/22/2003 12:53:20 PM PST by stlnative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
BREAKING: CALLING HANS BLIX, FRAUD
IN ADDITION TO ANTHRAX - IRAQI MISSILES SEEN IN BAGHDAD


5 posted on 03/22/2003 12:55:26 PM PST by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
These are Surface to Air missiles (SAMs).

They're not banned.
6 posted on 03/22/2003 12:57:43 PM PST by Riley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
>>Allied warplanes are now involved in an intensive effort to strike the Iraqis' mobile missile launchers before they fire again. <<

Can you say "napalm"? I knew you could (with apologies to the late Fred Rogers).
7 posted on 03/22/2003 1:00:39 PM PST by Jeff Chandler ( ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brigette
Maybe Saddam's "concussion" wore off...
8 posted on 03/22/2003 1:03:46 PM PST by jerseygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
"One of the Ababil-100's that was intercepted flew about 110 miles. Before the war started this week, weapons inspectors were still debating its range."

Nothing like a demonstration and a long measuring tape to iron out that controversy. Looks like a great "Highway of Death Part II: Ababil" opportunity. Hey Iraqis, keep an eye on that rear view mirror. Something might be gaining on you.
9 posted on 03/22/2003 1:04:35 PM PST by usafsk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Riley
That looks awfully big for a SAM.
10 posted on 03/22/2003 1:04:39 PM PST by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Riley
They're not banned.

They should have been. Our whole problems with 1991 were the terms of surrender. We (thanks to kind advice from our good friends France, Germany, Russia, and China) effectively surrendered. What business did Saddam have with *any* military after that war? In fact why didn't we go to Baghdad?

11 posted on 03/22/2003 1:05:01 PM PST by EaglesUpForever (Ne messez pas avec le US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
>>That looks awfully big for a SAM.

If it's an SA-2, it ought to be- they're huge. It's *way* too small to be a SCUD, or similar.

I'll see if I can find some good SAM pics online and post a link.
12 posted on 03/22/2003 1:09:44 PM PST by Riley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EaglesUpForever
>>What business did Saddam have with *any* military after that war? In fact why didn't we go to Baghdad?<<

New World Order (Bush 41 WAS a wimp).
13 posted on 03/22/2003 1:12:33 PM PST by Jeff Chandler ( ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"So far, the Iraqis have not fired any of the few Scuds they are thought to have retained."

This is a blatant lie, and the NYT should be called on it. Saddam fired a scud into Kuwait and it has been positively idenitified as a scud.

14 posted on 03/22/2003 1:20:01 PM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riley

I found a pic with the same aspect, but no indication of scale. The SA-2 is about 35 feet long, and about almost a yard in diameter. It is a *BIG* missile.

15 posted on 03/22/2003 1:24:12 PM PST by Riley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I'm sure the maggots in charge of the NY Slimes would be very happy if the Iraqis killed some or a lot of our men in Iraq.
16 posted on 03/22/2003 2:57:28 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
On the 'Rat Underground, they're saying Bush will launch chemical weapons on our own troops so Iraq can be blamed.
17 posted on 03/22/2003 4:23:35 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Also on the 'Rat Underground, they're discussing whether Saddam would be "justified" to launch biological weapons on our troops... most have concluded that he would be!
18 posted on 03/22/2003 4:24:25 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Are these people aware that there is a thing called the Geneva Convention that bans biological and chemical attacks?

That is un-fripping-believable. Dummies Underground is appropriate.
19 posted on 03/22/2003 4:49:19 PM PST by OpusatFR (Free Speech means you can talk and I can criticize! It doesn't mean you talk and I shut up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Looks like an Sa-2 or long range interceptor missile.

Still, smaller than the SA-4 Ganef for sure.

20 posted on 03/22/2003 4:53:05 PM PST by Centurion2000 (We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson