Posted on 03/17/2003 7:36:36 AM PST by cogitator
Some (not all) of what you suggest still costs money; money that many of these people who are trying to get their next meal don't have. As you say, it's hard to relate to existence where everything goes just to get to the next day.
It doesn't sound like an insurmountable problem that requires first-world monies to solve.
A real sanitation system would. The article does refer to lower-tech solutions that appear to work and also generate useful by-products, such as agricultural fertilizer. It would seem (to me) that the best way to attack the problem is to go for easy-to-implement, low-tech solutions first. Living as we are with three toddlers, I know that quite a bit of useful clean water is getting flushed in our household (hopefully they'll get past this fascination-with-flushing stage soon)!
It's the number of people doing it, and where they are doing it. Not necessarily in the woods and fields; more like in the same gutter that flows by the front door of their next 10 next-door neighbors.
And they also drink from that same gutter. Would that be a crisis for you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.