Skip to comments.
Former CIA officers appeal to current analysts to make public any anti-war information
AP
| 3/14/03
| JOHN J. LUMPKIN
Posted on 03/14/2003 11:45:02 AM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
1
posted on
03/14/2003 11:45:03 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
What next!
2
posted on
03/14/2003 11:48:02 AM PST
by
Dog
( Groundhog Day II -- the Sequel.....America held hostage by the UN.......where everyday is the same)
To: kattracks
A small group composed mostly of retired CIA officers From a recent Administration, no doubt.
To: kattracks
The LONGER President Bush BLIX's, the more AMMO he gives to our enemies like those above.
4
posted on
03/14/2003 11:48:39 AM PST
by
funkywbr
To: JennysCool
No doubt.
Bubba not getting enough info?
5
posted on
03/14/2003 11:50:10 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Does anyone understand that we are and have been in a cease-fire with this country. If there were no 9/11 we would still be perfectly, even overly legitimate in ousting the Iraqi regime. Including 9/11 ends any argument.
What did these guys learn in the CIA? Was it that Iraq was really just a pawn of US imperialism?
6
posted on
03/14/2003 11:50:12 AM PST
by
JmyBryan
To: kattracks
So, this guy is the Daniel Ellsberg of the CIA?
7
posted on
03/14/2003 11:50:29 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: kattracks
It is, of course, easy to ask other people to break their oaths and go to prison. No one with any integrity inside the Agency is going to release anything, so if there are "leaks" in response to this they will not have any credibility.
As an aside, I have a close friend that I know worked for the CIA for 4 years "in the field", and he has never even admitted that is who he was working for, let alone talked about anything he was doing.
8
posted on
03/14/2003 11:50:53 AM PST
by
coramdeo
To: kattracks
Members of the group contend the Bush administration has released information on Iraq that meets only its ends -- while ignoring or withholding contrary reporting. That's sorta the point.
Methinks these clowns are retired for a reason...
9
posted on
03/14/2003 11:52:29 AM PST
by
IncPen
To: coramdeo
Agreed; these people speaking out are probably secretaries!
10
posted on
03/14/2003 11:53:18 AM PST
by
Peach
To: JennysCool
Some guy that retired a decade ago wants to challenge the Bush Administration? Give me a break! They should shut up, just as clinton and carter should.
11
posted on
03/14/2003 11:53:19 AM PST
by
Wait4Truth
(God Bless our President!)
To: kattracks
"It takes a courageous person to get by all that, and say, 'I've got a higher duty'."Oh - who would that courageous person be, Ray?
I guess you are, huh?
Well if I may say so myself, it takes an incredibly handsome man to identify you as the self-aggrandizing twit you are, Rayster.
12
posted on
03/14/2003 11:53:57 AM PST
by
wideawake
(You'd better look out for me - I'm a member of the F.V.K.)
To: kattracks
This is important. I think all of these same people spoke out when Clinton sent 400+ cruse missles. They also spoke loudly about Carter and North Korea and Panama Canal.
Does anyone have their names so we can give them credit for their former and current opinions?
13
posted on
03/14/2003 11:55:59 AM PST
by
paguch
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: kattracks
"He left the agency over a decade ago," said spokesman Mark Mansfield. "He's hardly in a position to comment knowledgeably on that subject." I'll bet this guy is less informed than FReepers.
To: Wait4Truth
Some guy that retired a decade ago wants to challenge the Bush Administration?France is....Russia is..
Guinea dissed us...
There is no bite.... behind the bark.
16
posted on
03/14/2003 11:59:44 AM PST
by
Dog
( Groundhog Day II -- the Sequel.....America held hostage by the UN.......where everyday is the same)
To: kattracks
Help me understand this...Colin Powell, Donald Rumsfeld, Tommy Franks, et el...everyone is falsifying infomation or being duped into putting their credibility and integrity on the line to what, make Bush look good or promote a conspiracy???
17
posted on
03/14/2003 12:01:21 PM PST
by
mingwah
To: kattracks
Kat,
Because I am a misguided optimist, I think this is a "good idea".
Any current CIA personel who takes this "small group composed mostly of retired CIA officers" up on their offer can be promptly arrested for disclosing information vital to our national security. The now ex-CIA personel would be prosecuted for crimes proportional to the secrecy level of the information disclosed to these unauthorized civilians.
The "retired CIA officers" will be identifying who they are as accomplices while removing duplicitous dead wood from the CIA. It is a win-win for the American people.
18
posted on
03/14/2003 12:03:33 PM PST
by
jriemer
(We are a Republic not a Democracy)
To: IncPen; aculeus; general_re; BlueLancer; Poohbah
Methinks these clowns are retired for a reason...These clowns just proved they never should have been hired.
19
posted on
03/14/2003 12:03:36 PM PST
by
dighton
To: kattracks
Anyone doing this and putting the lives of American soldiers or airmen in jeopardy should be immediately arrested and jailed for treason. And kept in solitary confinement at a US Military Base for the duration of the Iraq war.
20
posted on
03/14/2003 12:03:42 PM PST
by
UncleSamUSA
(the land of the free and the home of the brave)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson