Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE POLITICS OF PIGMENTATION. WARD CONNERLY LIVE ON THE BANANA REPUBLICAN RADIO HOUR TONIGHT!
Radio FreeRepublic and the Free Republic Network ^ | March 6, 2003 | Luis Gonzalez

Posted on 03/06/2003 6:42:25 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Luis Gonzalez

The Radio FreeRepublic Chat Server is UP!

Click here to chat!


 

Radio Free Republic

Radio FreeRepublic - Click the banner or
here to listen live at 9pm ET / 6pm PT !

 


TONIGHT'S SHOW IS
ALSO AVAILABLE IN HI-FI 
MODE
FOR CABLE / DSL / BROADBAND USERS
(Not available until 9pm ET / 6pm PT)

BROADBAND USERS CLICK HERE AT 9PM ET

The call in number is 1-866-RadioFR (1-866-723-4637)

Radio FreeRepublic show archives are located here.

21 posted on 03/06/2003 5:46:51 PM PST by agitator (Ok, mic check...line one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: agitator
hey and BUMP!!
22 posted on 03/06/2003 6:05:01 PM PST by herewego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth; rdf
I've never really understood why Jeb would rebuff him.

Hello Gene,

Based on what I remember reading in the newspapers when they bothered to take the time to report what Gov Bush was saying then, I think what Gov Bush did was not so much a rebuff against Ward. Gov Bush's actions concerned the issue more than Ward.

The issue as seen by Gov Bush was this one: Should Ward's very divisive ballot issue actually go on the ballot here -- in this highly diverse state -- potentially causing great division among people?

I think Gov Bush's answer was: No. There has to be another way.

So, thinking out of the box here, Gov Bush did what real leaders do: he made a decision.

And, he issued an Executive Order, AND took the heat for his decision -- for a VERY long time, I might add.

In short - an A+ to Gov Bush for having enough guts and brains to do what many others can not do: Lead.
23 posted on 03/06/2003 6:08:42 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth; rdf
PS :)
24 posted on 03/06/2003 6:10:00 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
I had the privilege of sitting next to Mr. Connerly at a dinner about five years ago. He's one of the most principled and most far-seeing Conservative leaders I've spoken to. He's approached the campaign against race preferences with patience and persistence; he's receivied rebuffs and resistance from his supposed 'friends' in the Republican party with far more endurance than I could muster. He's clearly one of the towering figures of conservatism in our time.
25 posted on 03/06/2003 6:32:29 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
So a retreat from a principled position is leadership, is it?

Do you work for Jeb?

26 posted on 03/06/2003 6:33:52 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: summer
Divisive? That's comical & silly. Divisive? to whom? Liberals?

The exact same referendum passed in Washington, a very liberal state with 58% of the vote.

The exact same referendum passed in California, another very liberal state with 62% of the vote.

Internal polls in Florida, a more conservative state than either Washington or California, showed a 70% preference for Connerly's initiative.

It is rather revealing that you use the word "divisive" as this is the same, exact word that Jeb used when he rebuffed Connerly.

I daresay that Connerly's referendum would probably be a 90% issue on FreeRepublic, which begs the question why you are against it as well as why Jeb was against it.

It is bascially a litmus test for conservatives and those who oppose the language/intent of Connerly's initiative pretty much reveal themselves as something other than conservative.

Lastly, conservatives are not too happy with Executive Orders being used instead of legislature or referendum by the people.

Of all the rediculous ballot referenda - bullet trains to nowhere, 16 per classroom as part of state constitution, pigs! - in Florida lately, it is unconscienable to me that a serious issue as presented by Mr. Connerly was sabotagued by Jeb Bush & his supporters.

The people of Florida should have had their chance to vote on this.

Jeb did not lead - he dictated - and took away the chance for the people's voice to be heard.

Those are the facts.

27 posted on 03/06/2003 6:38:57 PM PST by Seeking the truth (I'm going on the FRN Cruise - How about you? - Details at www.Freerepublic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
Those are the facts.

As you see them, Gene. I told you the facts I see.

And as for this comment:

It is rather revealing that you use the word "divisive" as this is the same, exact word that Jeb used when he rebuffed Connerly.

"Revealing?" Let's consider what was actually REVEALED:

Gov Bush spoke that word and it was published in the newspaper.

I read that word he spoke quoted by him in the newspaper. As did many other people. As you pointed out, it was a word used at that time during this matter.

I don't know what you think you revealed here. But, no matter. You have a great day, Seeking the Truth! Well, what's left of it anyway. I have been sick all day, so I will take my leave from here, but I wish you well. :)
28 posted on 03/06/2003 6:46:37 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
Those are the facts.

As you see them, Gene. I told you the facts I see.

And as for this comment:

It is rather revealing that you use the word "divisive" as this is the same, exact word that Jeb used when he rebuffed Connerly.

"Revealing?" Let's consider what was actually REVEALED:

Gov Bush spoke that word and it was published in the newspaper.

I read that word he spoke quoted by him in the newspaper. As did many other people. As you pointed out, it was a word used at that time during this matter.

I don't know what you think you revealed here. But, no matter. You have a great day, Seeking the Truth! Well, what's left of it anyway. I have been sick all day, so I will take my leave from here, but I wish you well. :)
29 posted on 03/06/2003 6:46:51 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
Those are the facts.

As you see them, Gene. I told you the facts I see.

And as for this comment:

It is rather revealing that you use the word "divisive" as this is the same, exact word that Jeb used when he rebuffed Connerly.

"Revealing?" Let's consider what was actually REVEALED:

Gov Bush spoke that word and it was published in the newspaper.

I read that word he spoke -- quoted in the newspaper. (As did many other people.) And, as you pointed out, it was a word used at that time, during this matter.

I don't know what you think you revealed here. But, no matter. You have a great day, Seeking the Truth! Well, what's left of it anyway. I have been sick all day, so I will take my leave from here, but I wish you well. :)
30 posted on 03/06/2003 6:48:05 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: summer
I don't know what you think you revealed here.

I didn't. You did it yourself.

Hope you're feeling better.

31 posted on 03/06/2003 6:53:32 PM PST by Seeking the truth (I'm going on the FRN Cruise - How about you? - Details at www.Freerepublic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: summer
I don't know what you think you revealed here.

I didn't. You did it yourself.

Hope you're feeling better.

32 posted on 03/06/2003 6:53:46 PM PST by Seeking the truth (I'm going on the FRN Cruise - How about you? - Details at www.Freerepublic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: summer
I don't know what you think you revealed here.

I didn't. You did it yourself.

Hope you're feeling better.

33 posted on 03/06/2003 6:53:57 PM PST by Seeking the truth (I'm going on the FRN Cruise - How about you? - Details at www.Freerepublic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
Thanks, Gene.
34 posted on 03/06/2003 6:54:47 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
PS :)
35 posted on 03/06/2003 6:56:18 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
great show! thanks
36 posted on 03/06/2003 7:00:39 PM PST by herewego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
OK; Gene, I wasn't planning to return to this thread, and I didn't reread our conversation there, but, I realize now what happened (and, you're right - sometimes it takes me awhile).

You recall the word "divisive" and you thought: 90% of FL is conservative -- so, "divisive" is inaccurate and a crock of sh*t. Something like that. Right?

But, I recall reading the word "divisive" and I thought: about 40% could vote Dem/40% could vote GOP/and 20% are independents (like me) and you never know what the h*ll they'll do in the voting booth in FL -- so "divisive" is right on the money.

Now what you were seeking is revealed.

PS Good night! :)
37 posted on 03/06/2003 7:23:16 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: summer
Wrong.
38 posted on 03/06/2003 7:28:00 PM PST by Seeking the truth (I'm going on the FRN Cruise - How about you? - Details at www.Freerepublic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: herewego
Great show?

Guest no show.

Thanks for the support.
39 posted on 03/06/2003 7:35:28 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
Crap!

There was more action in the thread than on my show!
40 posted on 03/06/2003 7:36:25 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson