Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Disappearance of Laci Peterson
FindLaw ^ | Marc 3, 2003 | Jonna M. Spilbor

Posted on 03/04/2003 5:39:16 AM PST by runningbear

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
I found this article interesting....

Scott Free: Scott Peterson didn't kill his wife, but he is full of bologna

Scott Free

Scott Peterson, managing editor March 03, 2003

Scott Peterson didn't kill his wife, but he is full of bologna

My wife walked into the room just in time to see the confession.

A breathless reporter was on camera, talking about the startling news. Under the picture of the reporter, the bulletin was printed in large letters on Fox News: A woman admitted that she had been having an affair with suspected murderer Scott Peterson.

As Ricky Ricardo used to say, I had some splainin' to do.

Fortunately, I had an alibi this time, so Nancy was not too worried. The woman I was accused of murdering was my wife. We only had to check Nancy's pulse and I was in the clear. (Because she fainted slightly due to the news, that took a little more work than we thought. But eventually my name was cleared.)

Having a common name has its blessings. It means people generally can read your lousy penmanship and you don't have to explain your spelling too much (Is that "on" or "en"?).

But it does mean you get a lot of strange calls from people thinking you are somebody you are not.

"Are you the same Scott Peterson who was a pilot?"

"Are you the Scott Peterson who had that bologna for sale in Chicago?"

"Did you used to work at the Journal in circulation?"

"Aren't you the guy who murdered his wife in California?"

No, no, no and (thought I'd fall for that last question, didn't you?) no.

I used to camp a lot as a Boy Scout and I can still remember the day my mother handed me a newspaper clipping about a boy named Scott Peterson who fell to his death while climbing at Devil's Lake State Park. It was eerie, because I had recently been there and this boy was almost exactly my age.

However, if you think you are unique, I urge you to do a Google search of your name, and you quickly find out how ordinary you really are. There is somebody out there named Scott Peterson who sells cars. I have my own logo stuck on the bumpers of cars in South Dakota.

According to Google, I am also an English professor in Maine, I designed a phlebotomy cart, I am a freestyle swimmer at the University of Massachusetts, I wrote a vegetarian cookbook, I am a reporter in Iraq for the Christian Science Monitor, and I probably murdered my wife, Laci. (Now, I ask you, would I have had time to murder my wife while I was doing all this? You can ask my wife, Nancy. She can tell you I don't have any time to walk the dog, much less do the other things mentioned in the 688,000 things Google found with my name on them.)

I am not alone. My son, Kyle Peterson, when he still had hopes of being a big-leaguer, looked at me wide-eyed one day when I told him the Milwaukee Brewers had just picked up a pitcher named Kyle Peterson.

With a curious blend of hope and fear in his face, the little tyke said, half questioning, "That's not me?"

EXCERPTED LINK....

1 posted on 03/04/2003 5:39:16 AM PST by runningbear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: runningbear; Rheo; spectre; Jaded; Mystery Y; Searching4Justice; brneyedgirl; Scupoli; sissyjane; ..
Pinging....
2 posted on 03/04/2003 5:44:44 AM PST by runningbear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
I disagree with the article about the lie detector test.

I want the police as quickly as possible to rule me out so they can start hunting for my wife. I arrange for a series of 4 or 5 lie detector tests paid for by the police. Each is conducted by a different expert. The police get 2 and my lawyer gets 2.

We do them quickly, bang, bang, bang, and get them over with. My lawyer has total access to all information.

I'm innocent. The bulk of the data tells the police to go searching elsewhere. If they don't, then the press release from my lawyer asks them "why are you looking where you have no evidence and a series of tests demonstrating this is an extremely low probability area in which to be looking?"
3 posted on 03/04/2003 5:47:53 AM PST by xzins (Babylon, you have been weighed in the balance and been found wanting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I know many would disagree with it, just some stuff from another side, maybe for a defense agrument for the prosecution.....
4 posted on 03/04/2003 5:52:18 AM PST by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theroies, and news oline.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: runningbear; TexKat; jdontom
On Kristine Johnson, I am hearing that suspect that is in custody, has not been tagged to Kristine's death, YET.... Santa Monica PD is being careful not to name a suspect from the news I have glanced over so far.... Still developing.
5 posted on 03/04/2003 5:54:22 AM PST by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theroies, and news oline.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Good point.

Peterson's main concern in the early hours should have been finding his wife and, therefore, he avoided the first major step in that process: eliminating himself as a suspect.
6 posted on 03/04/2003 5:55:20 AM PST by xzins (Babylon, you have been weighed in the balance and been found wanting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
More garbage spills out of the lawyer class.
7 posted on 03/04/2003 5:59:29 AM PST by hgro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Absolutely. I would do ANYTHING to help the police find my wife as soon as possible if she disappeared.
8 posted on 03/04/2003 6:01:53 AM PST by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I personally would refuse to take lie detector tests except when my child or husband or parent is missing or murdered.

As for giving credit to Scott for having admitted the affair -- he did if after he was caught. Initially he lied about it. There might even be other girlfriends.

9 posted on 03/04/2003 6:06:56 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DB
Someone needs to do a Jackie Gleason shtick about now.

"Pow, right in the kisser!"
10 posted on 03/04/2003 6:07:33 AM PST by xzins (Babylon, you have been weighed in the balance and been found wanting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Okay, you say, I can see why Peterson shouldn't take a polygraph - it might wrongly indicate that he's guilty. But why can't he talk to the police? If he's innocent, he's got nothing to fear, right?

Wrong. When the police tell you anything you say can be used against you, they mean it. Remember, under our system, only guilt - not innocence - needs to be proved. Scott Peterson doesn't have to "prove his innocence" by talking. Instead, the presumption of innocence means that, if he didn't do it, he doesn't need to talk.

Says it all...

11 posted on 03/04/2003 6:16:06 AM PST by alexandria ((Shpeling Opshunal))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hgro; All
yes, but ya have to know it is there....

Don't know if anyone viewed MSNBC story, EXCERPTED:

The unfolding Laci Peterson case A search of the Peterson property is the culmination of an emotional week for the feuding Petersons and the Rochas

Police continue to insist that their goal is to gather evidence and consider all possibilities. In fact, on the record, Scott is not a suspect.

What does Scott think?

Scott told Abrams, “I hope the police are doing everything they can to find Laci, and I trust that they are. I am missing my wife and my child. I can’t drive, I can’t sleep. Sometimes I feel I just can’t do it. I feel like I’m in a dark corner, and I just can’t function.” Abrams believes Scott sounds like a broken man – and no wonder considering all the pressure that Scott has been under from police, media and Laci’s family.

This week alone the hoopla was enormous. The entire street where Scott and Laci live was shut down and police tape was put around the house. According to one investigator, the police tape was an indication they are considering the house a crime scene – though this was not an official statement.

On Wednesday’s Abrams Report, forensic pathologist, Michael Baden, and former FBI profiler, Clint Van Zandt, joined Abrams. They commented on whether or not the search can be considered a criminal investigation.

According to Zandt, “It’s semantics here. Are they targeting Scott Peterson? This is a guy who continues to shoot himself in the foot and wonder why he’s bleeding. He’s got a relationship outside of marriage, now we’re tying Viagra into that. Who knows what that means, and who cares at this point? But we’ve got a guy who sells his wife’s vehicle, who supposedly is going to sell the house, takes out a life insurance policy, runs down to Mexico for work or whatever. He’s grown a mustache and he’s grown a beard. I’ve worked with the families of kidnapped victims for years and the one thing they do is always do is keep everything constant because when their loved one comes home they believe they want everything to be the same. This guy has changed everything. It’s like he’s closed the book and he’s moving on with his life. He says one thing, he does another ... and that’s what bothers me about him.”

According to Baden, “Certainly, one can’t eliminate Scott by going to his house. The only reason they’d be going to his house is not to eliminate him. There’s nothing they can find there that will exclude him, and I think that what they’re doing is trying to get as much information as they can. There may be some evidence that they have that she was injured in the house. They’ll be looking at all the traps, all the water, the bathtub.”

This second search may be driven by findings from the first search – though at this point what the police are doing is all speculation.

In the meantime, the families are struggling to come to terms with events.

Jackie Peterson, Scott’s mother, continues to stand behind Scott and told Abrams, “Scott is a victim in this. We’re talking about Laci’s family. It’s Scott Peterson, her husband, who is missing his wife and baby. And I think people need to start remembering that.”

However, Laci Peterson’s family, the Rochas, spoke with MSNBC’s “Donahue” on Feb. 11, and talked to “The Abrams Report” February 13th with a different take.

The first public signs of strain were evident when Sharon Rocha, Laci’s mother, told “Donahue” that she had questions about Scott the minute she heard that Laci had disappeared. Laci’s siblings, Brent Rocha and Amy Rocha, expressed the same apprehension of Scott.

Brent Rocha: “I don’t think he (Scott) is cooperating as fully as he could be. He’s not acting like a husband who’s missing his wife. He’s not working with the family — our family at least, in finding Laci. He has not been truthful or forthcoming; just numerous behaviors that just don’t add up for us.”

Scott’s actions and inactions have caused a rift between the families that appears to have started over the news that Scott had an affair prior to Laci’s disappearance. Scott eventually admitted to the affair and said that it had nothing to do with Laci’s Christmas Eve disappearance. The Rochas, however, are still struggling with the revelation.

The shocks continue. Only time will tell what the police have been able to find this week.

12 posted on 03/04/2003 6:18:21 AM PST by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theroies, and news oline.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Means, motive, opportunity. Nobody is in a more likely position to possess all three than Scott Peterson. Scott may very well be innocent, and there was a mysterious third person who abducted Laci Peterson, presumedly murdered her and disposed of the remains.

Do I hear the rustling sounds of pigs about to take flight?

Oh. Sorry. Just imagining things, again.
13 posted on 03/04/2003 6:33:02 AM PST by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dante3
Initially he lied about it.

That's why I tell my kids to build their reputations for truth-telling, because one day it might really matter that people believe them. It is easy to see why people suspect a liar of telling other lies...like "what really happened" to his wife. And it is hard to sympathize with a man who cheats on his pregnant wife.

14 posted on 03/04/2003 6:47:33 AM PST by lsee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Peterson's main concern in the early hours should have been finding his wife and, therefore, he avoided the first major step in that process: eliminating himself as a suspect.

It appears his first concern was not getting caught.

15 posted on 03/04/2003 6:51:01 AM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I have no problem submitting, for example, DNA samples. The problem with "lie detectors" is that they are voodoo. You might as well have stones piled on you or get dunked in water on the end of a pole. Those methods would be just as reliable in proving you innocent.
16 posted on 03/04/2003 6:58:52 AM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Having a common name has its blessings. It means people generally can read your lousy penmanship and you don't have to explain your spelling too much (Is that "on" or "en"?).

My husband has a common name with an uncommon spelling. Unless someone knows us very well they probably don't know how we spell our last name. Just a few weeks ago a man was arrested in this area for several burgleries. Even though the name was spelled a little differently, it was still quite shocking to see the name flashed on the TV and in the newspaper. Thankfully the guy doesn't look anything like my husband and they usually showed the suspects picture with the name. Otherwise it could have made for a lot of explaining especially since my husband and I have master keys to hundreds of apartments.

17 posted on 03/04/2003 7:04:01 AM PST by muggs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eno_
I feel the same way.
18 posted on 03/04/2003 7:09:22 AM PST by muggs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Many DEFENSE lawyers disagree with you about the validity, but agree with you that they don't let their clients do them. (F.Lee Bailey was one who really thought the lie detector gave good, useful information, if I remember correctly.)
19 posted on 03/04/2003 7:10:18 AM PST by xzins (Babylon, you have been weighed in the balance and been found wanting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: lsee
Good point!
20 posted on 03/04/2003 7:15:13 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson