1 posted on
02/26/2003 7:21:42 AM PST by
RCW2001
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: RCW2001
>>Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, writing for the majority<<
So, where's the "minority report?" Oh, it was 8-0. Never mind.
This thing was harassment from the beginning.
53 posted on
02/26/2003 7:58:38 AM PST by
RobRoy
To: RCW2001
The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that a federal racketeering law was improperly used to punish aggressive anti-abortion protesters, a major victory for people who regularly block clinic doors. Chuckie and Hillary will NOT be happy about this. The Dems should replace their party's symbol from a donkey to a fetus with a slash through it.
59 posted on
02/26/2003 8:03:54 AM PST by
Hacksaw
To: RCW2001; Maximilian
Not only a victory for us -- but also (I hope) a first step in rolling back the insidious abuses of RICO!
To: RCW2001
Common sense prevails.
64 posted on
02/26/2003 8:07:35 AM PST by
RobbyS
To: RCW2001
This begs the question. What can they be punished for? Tresspassing? Disturbing the peace? Does this mean we can block the doors again or what?
69 posted on
02/26/2003 8:10:37 AM PST by
Khepera
(Do not remove by penalty of law!)
To: RCW2001
BUMP!!
73 posted on
02/26/2003 8:12:29 AM PST by
AndrewC
To: RCW2001
The court's 8-0 ruling... 'bout time!
Bump for Life!!!
To: RCW2001
MEGA BUMP!!!
To: RCW2001
Thank you, Jesus!
86 posted on
02/26/2003 8:26:12 AM PST by
Campion
To: RCW2001
Pro life bump
90 posted on
02/26/2003 8:32:24 AM PST by
tutstar
To: RCW2001
The Supreme Court holds the key to the survival or death of this Republic. There are enough cases in the appellate pipeline at any one time to either usurp or to solidify, for a foreseeable future, the founders' view of their Constitution.
It will not happen with our power gourging Congress, nor through a charismatic executive. Short of sunsetting every law currently on the books and starting from the beginning, the only hope for the future of this country is a Supreme Court which interprets law against both the expressed language of the Constitution and the writings of both those who proposed it (Federalist Papers) and those who warned against it and predicted its consequences (Anti-Federalist Papers).
92 posted on
02/26/2003 8:34:39 AM PST by
Tucson
(Dare to confuse the issues with the facts)
To: RCW2001
That is fantastic news.
94 posted on
02/26/2003 8:40:16 AM PST by
amused
(Republicans for Sharpton!)
To: AKA Elena; american colleen; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; Aristophanes; ArrogantBustard; Askel5; ...
LIFE LIFE LIFE LIFE
95 posted on
02/26/2003 8:43:57 AM PST by
Notwithstanding
(Satan is real. So are his minions. Palpy is one of them.)
To: AKA Elena; american colleen; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; Aristophanes; ArrogantBustard; Askel5; ...
LIFE LIFE LIFE LIFE
96 posted on
02/26/2003 8:44:55 AM PST by
Notwithstanding
(Satan is real. So are his minions. Palpy is one of them.)
To: RCW2001
Has Nina Totenberg passed out yet?
100 posted on
02/26/2003 8:49:29 AM PST by
bvw
To: RCW2001
In considering abortion, the question is not when Human Life begins, but how and when it will be ended.
To: RCW2001
Thank you Jesus!
To: RCW2001; Poohbah
Hooray, 8-0!
What do you say now, Poohbah? Is this a decision in favor of violence?
To: RCW2001
Woo Hoo! Sanity at the top of the judicial system.
I think most of the liberals on the courts were able to imagine RICO suits being brought against left-wing protesters and did the right thing.
To: RCW2001
Pro-Life bump!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson