Skip to comments.
Forgotten man (WOD Alert)
Creative Loafing ^
| 12.04.02
| BY SCOTT HENRY
Posted on 02/08/2003 3:53:03 AM PST by gd124
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: philman_36
Mr. Sam Zhadanov probably had no idea that the DEA rivals the KGB in the "dirty tricks" department. They robbed this guy of his life, liberty and his pursuit of happiness.
21
posted on
02/08/2003 5:40:58 AM PST
by
csvset
To: csvset
Happens all the time. Too little of it reaches or affects those that can do something about it. Too many multiple layers of "insulating bodies" for that to happen.
To: gd124; jmc813; *Wod_list
WOD bump
23
posted on
02/08/2003 6:06:46 AM PST
by
bassmaner
(Let's take back the word "liberal" from the commies!!)
To: gd124
He simply became another of the anonymous drug offenders who make up 57 percent of all federal inmates.That statistic alone should make anyone pause.
24
posted on
02/08/2003 6:26:44 AM PST
by
agrace
To: gd124
This is insane.
25
posted on
02/08/2003 6:56:52 AM PST
by
MonroeDNA
(leve the monkeys alone)
To: philman_36
That is the story.
26
posted on
02/08/2003 2:13:26 PM PST
by
Rifleman
To: Rifleman
All I needed was a couple of bits of info. Easily enough found.
My this thread has a deficit of replies. I sure figured it would attract the usual crowd.
To: Cultural Jihad; Roscoe; Skooz; gd124
Skooz fails to accurately
forecast (
Then the anti-WOD people (the same ones who post on every pot thread) will descend like locusts and post the same things they have posted on every other dope thread since James Polk was President.) and Cultural Jihad, Roscoe and the other supporters of the WOsD fail to even show. Somebody is slipping.
gd124, it
must be the subject matter. Maybe bigger things are going on. Maybe there is no entertainment, amusement or parody value in an innocent man doing years behind bars. I'm
sure the WODdies will be back on other threads. Maybe one not quite so destructive to the cause. Thanks for posting this one though.
Everything else I predicted in that post almost always comes true.Not bad for a forecast, but it sure wasn't an accurate "prediction" as is evidenced by this thread. I believe yours was what is called "an educated guess". Is this thread merely an anomaly?
All bets are off after this reply. I was commenting on replies 1-27.
To: robertpaulsen
You didn't even make it to the thread Bob.
To: philman_36
Poor Steve had Nancy Lord as his attorney.
30
posted on
02/08/2003 7:12:39 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
Poor Steve had Nancy Lord as his attorney.
So an inexperienced attorney is what landed him in prison?
Simply amazing!
To: gd124
"The Southern Lights investigation had uncovered, all told, more than 100 small, hemp-growing operations across north Georgia, and resulted in at least 30 arrests." They could have taken down all of these illegal pot growers without their obvious illegal actions against Southern Lights. On this one they were "out of control."
32
posted on
02/08/2003 7:35:30 PM PST
by
fightu4it
(oil at market prices. not extorsion by a murderous thug!)
To: philman_36
Ahh...but the thread is still young!
Ty Cobb's career batting average was .367; I'm probably batting a little over .500 vis a vis my "prediction,""prognostication," or "guess."
Regards.
BTW, You're right, "educated guess" is probably the right way to phrase it. Education mingled with experience having spent far too much time on FR.
33
posted on
02/08/2003 8:23:54 PM PST
by
Skooz
(Tagline removed by moderator)
To: philman_36
[Poor Steve had Nancy Lord as his attorney.]
So an inexperienced attorney is what landed him in prison?
Try: "So an inexperienced [outspoken Libertarian activist] attorney is what landed him in prison?"
34
posted on
02/08/2003 8:28:40 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
Try: "So an inexperienced [outspoken Libertarian activist] attorney is what landed him in prison?"
Okay...So, in your opinion, having an inexperienced, outspoken, Libertarian activist attorney is what landed him in prison?
The facts of the case, the corrupt witnesses, misleading testimony, lack of evidence, the tactics used...none of that has anything to do with the conviction and it's all the lawyers fault?
Is there anything you can't or won't justify?
To: Skooz
Ahh...but the thread is still young!
Well, I won't be back. I think the thread is dead. The article too plainly and clearly shows how corrupt the WOsD is and what tactics and measures are used in prosecuting it.
Let the WODdies defend those actions, if they can.
To: philman_36
Who knows how things might have turned out if he hadn't had a delusional cultist representing him?
I understand that she now lives in Pahrump, Nevada. Seems appropriate.
37
posted on
02/08/2003 8:59:05 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: philman_36
Another thing comes to mind. Why doesn't the Fed/DEA go after AT&T, Motorola, Sprint, Verizon, Cingular, et al. Using their logic cell phones are probably the biggest drug business enabler. Shouldn't the CEO's of those companies be prosecuted for enabling illegal drug commerce?
38
posted on
02/08/2003 10:00:25 PM PST
by
gaucho
To: philman_36
That'll teach you to predict "the anti-WOD people .... will descend like locusts".
So when they don't, you send up the bat signal and cry, "Come out, come out anti-WOD people so I don't look stupid in my prediction."
Nice try.
To: robertpaulsen; Skooz
Bob has a message for you Skooz...#39. He can't follow so I'll make an educated guess that he can't lead either.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson