Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Policy makers ignore alcohol in drug combat
The Daily Herald (UT) ^ | January 31, 2003 | Rick Soulier

Posted on 02/03/2003 9:54:04 AM PST by MrLeRoy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-297 next last
To: Lurking2Long
Druggies only care about drugs; nothing else is important.

The owner of this website is a druggie? He may not take too kindly to such an accusation.

61 posted on 02/03/2003 12:59:00 PM PST by FreeTally (How did a fool and his money get together in the first place?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Now you are showing your dementia. Attributing your argument/that of the government to others. You are one wierd character.
62 posted on 02/03/2003 1:00:51 PM PST by FreeTally (How did a fool and his money get together in the first place?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker
See my post #19. But maybe you're more interested in discussing the abuse of alcohol.
63 posted on 02/03/2003 1:00:52 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker
Don't bother with RP. He has already been questioned by more than a half-dozen posters about his obviously stupid comment and has gone into defensive/denial mode.
64 posted on 02/03/2003 1:02:11 PM PST by FreeTally (How did a fool and his money get together in the first place?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
How do you rationalize 'danger' as a valid criterion for legalization?

The dangers of drugs seems to be a major argument of the Drug Warriors. Personally, I think adults should be free to inflict on themselves any kind or degree of danger they choose.

What rational criterion do you propose?

65 posted on 02/03/2003 1:03:24 PM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
I am fully aware of the primary purpose of NyQuil® and DayQuil®.

How do you explain the presence of 10% alcohol in the NyQuil®? Do you think it's for coloration, shelf life, marketing gimmick, or sleep aid?

Or, give me your own theory.

66 posted on 02/03/2003 1:06:40 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Lurking2Long
Druggies only care about drugs; nothing else is important.

Could be; I don't know any "druggies."

Same goes for all Libertarians...

Are you claiming that Libertarians care only about drugs? Wrong; here is a list of other issues they care about: National Platform of the Libertarian Party.

67 posted on 02/03/2003 1:07:41 PM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Bzzzt! That is a cough medicine, not a sleeping aid. The active ingredients are:
500mg Acetaminophen (pain reliever/fever reducer)
15mg Dextromethorphan HBr (cough suppressant)
6.25mg Doxylamine succinate (antihistamine)
30mg Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride (nasal decongestant)

But thanks for playing.

68 posted on 02/03/2003 1:10:00 PM PST by Pahuanui (When a foolish man hears about the Tao, he laughs out loud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
How do you explain the presence of 10% alcohol in the NyQuil®? Do you think it's for coloration, shelf life, marketing gimmick, or sleep aid?

What? I have no ideas what you are even asking me.

You stated that there was a history of alcohol being used in the medical industry as a sleep aid. This is demonstrably false. Alcohol can be added to products such as cough and cold supresents to help those products that already have a specific purpose function as a relaxing agent. 10% alcohol in cough medicines does not make those two spoonfulls of the medicine a sleep aid.

69 posted on 02/03/2003 1:10:38 PM PST by FreeTally (How did a fool and his money get together in the first place?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Lurking2Long
Druggies only care about drugs; nothing else is important.

Same goes for all Libertarians...

TROLL ALERT!

My fondest wish for you (and the rest of you sanctimonious drug warrior trolls) is that YOUR SON GETS BUSTED for possession and has to go through the wringer of the criminal justice system, facing the possibility of getting sent to the ANAL RAPE CAMP for the sake of a bag of weed. Oh, but it would never happen to YOUR SON, would it?

Yeah, right.

70 posted on 02/03/2003 1:11:13 PM PST by bassmaner (Let's take back the word "liberal" from the commies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
"The dangers of drugs seems to be a major argument of the Drug Warriors"

What??? You brought it up in post #52. Furthermore, you expected me to argue along those lines.

Major argument of the Drug Warriors!

71 posted on 02/03/2003 1:11:57 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally; robertpaulsen
And I am leaving my computer for the remainder of the day. I will address any nonsense you post tomorrow.
72 posted on 02/03/2003 1:12:16 PM PST by FreeTally (How did a fool and his money get together in the first place?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Pahuanui
Bzzzzt! You didn't read down far enough. Look under "inactive ingredients".

Oh, why is that there? Gee, rp, I'll play stupid and won't even guess why in the heck they would make NyQuil® with 10% alcohol.

73 posted on 02/03/2003 1:17:36 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
We tried this; it was called Prohibition .... I'm to the point where I think the WOD is a collosal failure. Legalize it all ... 20 years will reduce the problem via Darwinian social selection.

Truer words were never spoken. The WOD has indeed failed in all the ways Prohibition failed.

The difference is "forfeiture". I suspect that if we had forfeiture during the Prohibition era, we'd still have Prohibition.

-Eric

74 posted on 02/03/2003 1:22:02 PM PST by E Rocc (back then there was more respect for Constitutional principles, of course...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
Good night. Then this note will start your day.

I had NyQuil® in mind when I made my original statement. All I'm saying is that alcohol has a current medical use as a sleep aid. It is in NyQuil® and not DayQuil® for that reason.

It is not used by itself as a sleep aid, although I remember stories about my grandmother giving a tablespoon of liquor to her children to get them to go to sleep.

Besides, my whole point was that alcohol is currently used in medicine, so I'll just rest my case there.

75 posted on 02/03/2003 1:27:15 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
They only add other issues as a "smokescreen"!
76 posted on 02/03/2003 1:28:59 PM PST by Lurking2Long
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: bassmaner
Won't happen...I have 5 daughters.

I want to protect them from predatory drug dealers and users!
77 posted on 02/03/2003 1:30:03 PM PST by Lurking2Long
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
"The dangers of drugs seems to be a major argument of the Drug Warriors"

What??? You brought it up in post #52.

'Marijuana is far from "harmless" -- it is pernicious.' - Drug Czar John Walters

78 posted on 02/03/2003 1:32:32 PM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Lurking2Long
They only add other issues as a "smokescreen"!

Provide evidence for your claim.

79 posted on 02/03/2003 1:33:05 PM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Lurking2Long
I want to protect them from predatory drug dealers and users!

Then the War On Some Drugs is failing you; kids report that they can get marijuana more easily than beer or cigarettes. Legalizing drugs for adults would give drug sellers an economic incentive to not sell to kids---namely, the risk of losing their legal adult market.

80 posted on 02/03/2003 1:35:02 PM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-297 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson