Skip to comments.
North Carolina House in Chaos ! Five Ballots - No Speaker !
Raleigh News-Observer ^
| 1/29/2003
| AMY GARDNER AND LYNN BONNER
Posted on 01/29/2003 12:50:52 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: Kuksool
Well, part deux of the festivities resume in the morning, so we'll see if anything changes. I think it's more perilous for our side in seeing another one of those 5 apostate Republicans jumping overboard to end the "madness" (as they would term it) and vote for Black. :-(
I don't know if they'll go for a co-speakership...
21
posted on
01/29/2003 6:05:58 PM PST
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~All our ZOT's are belong to us~)
To: BaBaStooey
The NC House may find that it can do without a speaker. The position may be superfluous in the midst of such 50-50 divisions betwenn Carolina liberals and conservatives. Maybe the legislature will simply have to adjourn and conduct no business at all. That could in itself save NC people money!
To: fieldmarshaldj
Disgraceful that our party can't get its act together here and elect a speaker ! If they can't have a speaker they can't get anything done. IF they can't get anything done, then no new taxes or stupid laws get passed ......
Where exactly is the down side to this again ??
23
posted on
01/29/2003 6:08:39 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(The meek shall inherit the Earth. The stars belong to the bold.)
To: Centurion2000
Where exactly is the down side to this again ?? (Andy Griffith imitation): I been studyin' on this right much and best I can figger is that their expense accounts'll be a whole lot higher than if they was a sitting' in that fine legislature building passing laws nobody wanted or needed.
To: fieldmarshaldj
Even it came as a surprise when one Democrat, Rep. Mary McAllister of Fayetteville, accidently voted with Republicans to adjourn when she meant to vote against adjournment. She must have move here from Flori-duh.
25
posted on
01/29/2003 6:29:41 PM PST
by
El Whino
To: Theodore R.
"
Maybe the legislature will simply have to adjourn and conduct no business at all. That could in itself save NC people money!"
It's a crying shame we can't reward them with commensurate compensation - er, with nothing....
26
posted on
01/29/2003 7:19:00 PM PST
by
azhenfud
To: fieldmarshaldj
Co-House Speakers and power sharing have been done before. During the 1990's, both the MI State House and the WA State House have had power sharing arrangements. I think it is the best way to end the political chaos in Carolina. But then again, having Raleigh shut down maybe a good thing. Gov. Easley won't be able to prose any more tax increases.
27
posted on
01/29/2003 7:24:45 PM PST
by
Kuksool
(Down With Easley & Edwards in '04!)
To: BaBaStooey
Hilarious that a state house of representatives has an even number of members Most do. I've often pondered this eventuality.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson