Skip to comments.
Covert army drives U.S. war machine
National Post ^
| January 25 2003
| Peter Goodspeed
Posted on 01/25/2003 10:08:00 AM PST by knighthawk
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; viadexter; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; keri; ...
Ping
2
posted on
01/25/2003 10:08:55 AM PST
by
knighthawk
(Why are you marching, son?)
To: *war_list; *TerrOrWar
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
bump
To: knighthawk
They also raised concerns that the United States had become far too reliant on stand-off intelligence from electronic intercepts and satellite observations, rather than inserting agents on the ground to monitor terrorists and other emerging threats. Now this is the way to do business. Signals intelligence and imagery intelligence are great tools, but they are not the same as having eyes and ears on the ground. A good mix of all three is a solid winner.
To: knighthawk
the Defence Secretary may have concluded conventional military units are too slow and cumbersome to do the job properly. In the past, U.S. administrations have made a clear distinction between the combat activities of Special Operations Forces and missions handled by the CIA, partly because post-Watergate era reforms forced the government to keep Congress informed of all CIA covert operations.
The regular military forces are for smashing huge enemy forces with overwhelming firepower, but are too slow to catch fleet terrorist cells. The CIA has been defanged and declawed for decades, and are unlikely to change soon for a variety of reasons. Calling upon the Special Operations Command is the perfect response. Even now they still face a good deal of restraint from their higher commanders, but if that restraint continues, Rumsfeld may let the reins slip more and more.
To: knighthawk
bump
7
posted on
01/25/2003 10:48:25 AM PST
by
Red Jones
To: knighthawk
covert pre-emptive operations. It's not pre-emptive if the scrotes have attacked you first. They have, so it's not.
8
posted on
01/25/2003 11:07:16 AM PST
by
El Gato
To: Fred Mertz; aristeides; honway; OKCSubmariner; swarthyguy
Gee, maybe these guys can kill Sadam and his sons and then America wont have to go to war against Iraq and kill a gazillion civilians?
9
posted on
01/25/2003 11:18:29 AM PST
by
Betty Jo
To: Betty Jo
Gee, maybe these guys can kill Sadam and his sons and then America wont have to go to war against Iraq and kill a gazillion civilians? Sorry, our guys are good, but I'm afraid they're not quite THAT good. Saddam and his sons are just a little too well protected. Saddam knows that there are guys who would love to assassinate him, which is why he had about half dozen men surgically altered to look exactly like him.
10
posted on
01/25/2003 11:23:37 AM PST
by
jpl
To: knighthawk; MP5SD; Gunrunner2; MudPuppy; tomcat; Gritty; opbuzz; spetznaz; PsyOp; XBob; CIBvet; ...
To: VaBthang4; knighthawk
Maybe one of you two can answer this question. Will the force be allowed to operate against American citizens in the US?
12
posted on
01/25/2003 11:31:55 AM PST
by
Sparta
(Statism is a mental illness)
To: Sparta
I dont mean to be curt but you can answer that yourself. The American Military is not allowed to operate against American Civilians inside the CONUS, Alaska, Hawaii, or our possesions. That is what Law Enforcment is for.
To: Sparta
Now I do not know the nomeclature but I would think the American Military would be permitted to operate against non-Americans inside the CONUS, Alaska, Hawaii and our possesions.
Maybe someone else could elaborate.
To: VaBthang4
Your posts 13 and 14 have answered my question. Thank you. American forces are allowed to operate against Americans fighting for the enemy overseas.
15
posted on
01/25/2003 11:40:07 AM PST
by
Sparta
(Statism is a mental illness)
To: Thud
ping
To: Steel Wolf
You mean we may have actually learned the lesson of Chosin?
17
posted on
01/25/2003 11:48:10 AM PST
by
dts32041
To: Libertarianize the GOP; knighthawk; *Bush Doctrine Unfold; randita; SierraWasp; Carry_Okie; ...
Thanks for the ping!
Knighthawk - thanks for posting this article!
Bush Doctrine Unfolds :
To find all articles tagged or indexed using Bush Doctrine Unfold , click below: |
|
click here >>> |
Bush Doctrine Unfold |
<<< click here |
|
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here) |
18
posted on
01/25/2003 12:05:00 PM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Impeach Gray Davis! (Disregard for now - he is still useful;))
To: Betty Jo; weikel
Better yet, the Saudi Royals and clerics.....
19
posted on
01/25/2003 12:12:01 PM PST
by
swarthyguy
(Guiliani for Mayor of Baghdad)
To: jpl
surgically altered to look exactly like him
A few more geldings into the mix.
:>0
20
posted on
01/25/2003 12:14:05 PM PST
by
xzins
(things that make you go.....hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm......)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson