Posted on 01/23/2003 2:27:27 PM PST by Timesink
. folded nor spindled
I remember right before a national election when one of the dem(commie) lawyers brought out the erroneous junk against Caspar Weinberger. I remember right before the senate election here in California when pubbie Bruce Herschenson got blindsided by Boxer about going into a stip joint some two yrs before with the setup from to goons on ACB TV. Remember everything in politics occurs NOT by happenstance.
The issue isn't that Ritter has recently been twice arrested for matters associated with child sex crimes. That is an incidental matter, a device that triggered our attention, interest and thinking.
We want to go back, what?, a year to the time that Ritter did a 180 and stopped saying that Iraq was hiding things and started saying that Iraq was clean.
That's the conspiracy that I want to investigate. Why the change? It was not rational, was not explained. These recent arrests, while not (perhaps) related, do give us a clue. Sadaam got Ritter on tape molesting a kid, male or female, and convinced Ritter that one way to avoid publication (Al-Jaziara?) was to change his story.
Today's perversion is only of interest in the context of the explanation it offers for his change of mind. His new position was never viewed as creditable by anyone but the ultra-left wing media and other America haters.
Us normal folks knew something was wrong but didn't know why. Ritter's position (and I was surprised at how the guy on CNN went after him) about his arrests simply discredits him further. So, instead of taking a bribe to change his position, it seems that he was blackmailed. On a plane to Bagdahd? What, doing more kids?
Ritter cancels Iraq trip to deal with media
That certainly seems possible, and is also under consideration at the FReeppost and response thread *here*. But the use of very young girls as prostitutes in blackmail/extortion arrangements is hardly anything new in the intelligence business, where the practicioners, some as young as eight or less, are sometimes known as *butterflies.*
Military strikes carried out for the purpose of enabling a vigorous UNSCOM to carry out its mandate are wholly justifiable. And one thing is certain: Without an UNSCOM carrying out the full range of its disarmament and monitoring activities unfettered by Iraqi obstruction, the only winner to emerge from this situation will be Saddam Hussein.
--Scott Ritter, The New Republic, December 21, 1998.
Wouldn't that have been right after Clinton's bombing of Iraq coinciding with the impeachment debate on the floor of the House?
Wait a minute, I thought getting 'debriefed' was Scott's plan in all this.
This is incredible. What a maroon. In case there's anybody left who doesn't know that 41-year-old Scott Ritter likes to play with himself in front of 14- and 16-year-old girls, he's going to go on the publicity circuit to make sure they find out. "I'm a victim!" he roars. "They're telling people about the time I tried to lure an underage girl to Burger King to watch me spank the monkey. It's a plot by the Right Wing Conspiracy!" You want a Walnetto, little girl? |
then he delays talking about it..............
then he lies about it.............
then he said it was old news.......
well who else used these tactics???????????????????????
Clinton!
Diagnosis? He's a BLOCKHEAD!
Five cents please...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.