Posted on 01/20/2003 4:42:02 AM PST by W04Man
If you ever make that mistake again, just think: FUNERALLY....not a whit of embarrassment there, nosiree bob.
Why start now?
Hat-Trick
Me, too...but he isn't innocent
I agree. I sure don't remember the LEFT apologizing to Gingrich.
Did they apologize to Bork?
Somehow I missed the "I'm Sorry's" delivered to Pickering and Priscilla Owen.
I can't imagine that's the reasoning of any of our military planners or elected officials, can you?
My question was if Ritter was still worthy of your praise.
Yeah, but people who have a "need to know" have a way of finding these kinds of things out. It may have actually been later when rocks starting getting turned over and he proved to be the weakest link.
Speaking of looney tune liberal losers, did y'all hear on Rush today that apparently they're gonna try out Alan Colmes as the left's answer to Rush. I got the impression he may not be the only one though, so it might only be a temporary thing. Well, actually, I have no doubt that it will be temporary when the phone lines are dead and he gets laughed off the air. Anyway, I think it's hysterical. That's like putting a rabbit in the ring against a Rottweiler. ROTFL!
Contacts between Cynthia Preiser, the fired assistant district attorney and Islamic groups, democrat big wigs, and others.
Ditto for the DA, who may be throwing his subordinate to the wolves.
Ditto for the judge who sealed the case.
Signs of federal agents snooping around the courthouse.
Fire department Ritter supposedly volunteers with.
Associations of Mrs. Ritter, including contacts with foreign citizens and unexplained trips abroad.
Bank accounts of all parties, with special attention placed on unexplained large deposits.
Trips to Switzerland by Ritter, his wife, or any relatives.
Bump to Miss Marple's excellent questions.
You sure got that right! I first saw him featured in a performance on, I think it was the Disney channel, several years ago. I do not impress easily and that kid had me spellbound! Fantastic talent, AND very original, which is something extremely rare any more.
Of course there is always the possibility that he would be the ideal candidate to get on the "warm" side of Saddam. LOL! I mean, who knows what kind of sick perversion HE is into himself. Maybe the previous administration's bombing campaign on Iraq was a coop designed to avert attention from more than one scandal. Could happen. Yes, I know its sick, but there is so much raw material to work with. ...
ROFLMAO
We would have to ask ourselves the question though: "what would be their motivation for doing so?" I think we can count on the big 3 and CNN, MSNBC, etc. to ignore it. After all; why would they make an issue of it when he has served their purpose so well? Of course, National Enquirer has their own agenda, so the question stands.
That occurred to me as well. Saddam provides "entertainment" for the pedophile pervert, Mr. Ritter, on his recent visit to Iraq, then uses it to keep him under control. Liberals such as Hillary seize on the opportunity to use him to undermine the president, their favorite passtime, and the media gets their jollies off of having him speaking against the war which is, of course, their agenda as well. One or all could have been part of the original game of playing puppetmaster over Ritter. The question is, whose toes were getting stepped on that decided to shut him up?
And let's not forget that lovely unAmerican outfit, the ACLU, and one of their current clients, NAMBLA. And of course all the apologists for Islam and its pedophile prophet.
Maybe he doesn't consider it relevant. It happens.
Or ask questions. Could be interesting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.