Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

INTERVIEW WITH DR. KURT RICHEBACHER -- Weekly Commentary
Investment Rarities ^ | 12/31/02 | Interview Transcript

Posted on 01/18/2003 1:03:18 PM PST by arete

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
U.S. stocks today are still overvalued. The worst part of the bear markets is still to come and it will result in the wholesale destruction of the financial wealth derived from the bubble economy.

A good read for anyone interested in hearing some truth about the economic recovery.

Richard W.

1 posted on 01/18/2003 1:03:18 PM PST by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bvw; Tauzero; kezekiel; ChadGore; Harley - Mississippi; Dukie; Matchett-PI; Ken H; MrNatural; ...
FYI

Comments and opinions welcome.

Richard W.

2 posted on 01/18/2003 1:04:19 PM PST by arete (Greenspan is an enemy of the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
There's no need to be mean spirited !

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

3 posted on 01/18/2003 1:04:35 PM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arete
Great snag...gonna print it...sit down on my sofa and read it...
4 posted on 01/18/2003 1:22:13 PM PST by antaresequity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arete
"Q Are we going to fall down and go boom?"

" A I would say prepare for much worse to come."

I don't want the truth......now just go way!

5 posted on 01/18/2003 1:33:19 PM PST by G.Mason (I'm here for the rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arete
Q Give us the cause of the profits problem.

A Corporate cost cutting, for one. The widespread measures that individual firms take to improve their own profits have, in the aggregate, the opposite effect on the profits of other firms. Business spending is the key source of business revenues, not consumer spending. A retrenchment in business spending cuts business revenues. Higher profits and higher prosperity cannot possibly come out of general cost cutting.

Q What else impacts profits?

A Rising depreciation charges on plants and equipment are a drag on profits.

Q And?

A Corporations took on an enormous amount of new debt and the interest charges are a record high expense. For example, in 1997, interest expense accounted for 23% of manufacturing profits; in 2001 for almost 100%.

Q But this borrowed money went into productive assets that improved profits, didn’t it?

A Very little went to net new investment. It’s great bulk went into mergers, acquisitions and stock repurchases, adding nothing to the economy’s productive capacity. Huge amounts were dissipated in worthless goodwill, reflecting absurdly high payments for acquisitions.

Q None of this borrowing helped profits?

A No. As profits went down, corporations effectively devastated their balance sheets and credit ratings. The deterioration in credit quality has been unbelievable.

The unintended consequences of a rush toward globalization?

6 posted on 01/18/2003 1:36:13 PM PST by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arete
As Dr. Rcihebacher notes, more stock market wealth was destroyed than ever before, but since it was only part of the profits from an insane bubble, does it really mean anything?
7 posted on 01/18/2003 1:36:34 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
I don't want the truth......now just go way!

Unfortunately for many, this truth is unstoppable. It is going to come knocking at your door.

Richard W.

8 posted on 01/18/2003 1:36:43 PM PST by arete (Greenspan is an enemy of the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: arete
So the dollar is going to drop way down, but against what?

The Euro? No, the euros such as Germany are going down. The Yen? No, the Japanese will go broke if the US goes downhill.

Gold? No, its good in time of war, etc. but not during recessions.

So what currency is going to stay high? The Pound? Swiss Francs?

9 posted on 01/18/2003 1:38:31 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arete
Q Doesn’t high tech have the greatest productivity gains?

A Such productivity growth is statistical hot air.


Closer reading later.
10 posted on 01/18/2003 1:38:38 PM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
but since it was only part of the profits from an insane bubble, does it really mean anything?

Do a reread and then you tell me if it means anything.

Richard W.

11 posted on 01/18/2003 1:41:43 PM PST by arete (Greenspan is an enemy of the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
So the dollar is going to drop way down, but against what?

When you find a dead bang answer to that, let me know cause that is where I want to put all those dollars before they become wallpaper.

Richard W.

12 posted on 01/18/2003 1:45:22 PM PST by arete (Greenspan is an enemy of the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: arete
An especially lucid explanation of where we are.

Clinton and Greenspan are heavily responsible for this situation, but so are the NWO-free-market advocates. Our huge balance of payment deficits are unsustainable, and have been growing for decades. It means that foreigners have been parking $3-400 billion here every year, investing in this country. At some point they are going to wake up to this very delicate situation and start trying to take their money back out.

Ironically, clinton could not have passed his world-trade measures such as NAFTA and most-favored-nation treatment for China without Republican help. And Bush, although he didn't cause this situation, is doing little to try to fix it.

The American economic system grew and expanded under a system of tariffs. Now we are farming all our jobs out to other countries. It was a wonderful quick fix, but disastrous over the long-run.
13 posted on 01/18/2003 1:53:27 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arete
What astounds me is how many people embrace delusion today. "Turn vice into virtue."

Easily this is the scariest article I've read on our economy but there would be no reason to be afraid if I didn't believe it. Good article.
14 posted on 01/18/2003 2:08:59 PM PST by jwh_Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arete
Like I said in my private post ...

Yes, runaway money and credit growth and the typical symptoms associated with overheating economies – inflation, speculation and financial excess.

... economies run and built on this scenario may be in the past.

It's a time for consolidation and wealth protection and living the good life. Having a new car, computer, clothes, girl or boy friend (for the girls here), etc. every 6 months to a year only get's you into debt which makes you a slave to the employers and financiers.

15 posted on 01/18/2003 2:14:30 PM PST by imawit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Clinton and Greenspan are heavily responsible for this situation,

Actually, I believe that it's the American people who are responsible. Clinton was just another gangster that the American people decided collectively to place on the throne.

Did you ever see the movie "The Hunchback of Notre Dame", where the crowd crowned Quasimodo the "Prince of Fools" as they partied in the streets? That's what the American people, in their cocaine-induced delirium, did when they elected Clinton in '92.

Remember the mantra..."Character doesn't count"? A mantra that the American people certified as they elected Bill Clinton. The nation was doomed from that instant, for you see, character is in fact the only thing that does count!

16 posted on 01/18/2003 2:22:29 PM PST by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Ironically, clinton could not have passed his world-trade measures such as NAFTA and most-favored-nation treatment for China without Republican help. And Bush, although he didn't cause this situation, is doing little to try to fix it.

Like it or not, globalizion is part of the agenda of both political parties -- I say both parties in the context that in reality they are only different sides of the same ruling class elite coin. The pad their pockets while we get it in the neck.

Richard W.

17 posted on 01/18/2003 2:23:07 PM PST by arete (Greenspan is an enemy of the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
Corporate cost cutting, for one. The widespread measures that individual firms take to improve their own profits have, in the aggregate, the opposite effect on the profits of other firms. Business spending is the key source of business revenues, not consumer spending. A retrenchment in business spending cuts business revenues. Higher profits and higher prosperity cannot possibly come out of general cost cutting.

This paragraph sums it up.
How can the economy grow when everybody is cutting spending or going bankrupt?
For example:
The telecom banruptcies have almost killed Lucent and Northern Telecom. They in turn have slashed close to a hundred thousand jobs, that paid pretty damn well. These hundred thousand have not been able to find employment that matched their previous salary and have to downsize themselves. Now they aren't buying new toys and geegaws and the toy and geegaw manufacturers start feeling the pinch. Etc.
The trickle down effect is real.

18 posted on 01/18/2003 2:31:33 PM PST by dtel (Texas Longhorn cattle for sale at all times. We don't rent pigs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: arete; expatpat
AND, THE ANSWER IS

I want to put all those dollars before they become wallpaper.

It will be equal to wallpaper. More useful for fire than to buy wood to make a fire. See the Wiemar economy.

19 posted on 01/18/2003 2:39:23 PM PST by imawit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
It was a wonderful quick fix, but disastrous over the long-run.

Once again it was a quick fix to profits. But, it wasn't as quick or quick enough to not effect the balance of payments. Both entrys get made on the balance sheet at the same time.

Corporate mangers ... with the recklessness of desperadoes who have everything to gain in the short run and nothing to lose in the long run.

Globalization = take the money and run.

20 posted on 01/18/2003 2:48:47 PM PST by imawit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson