White House Brief Stops Short of Bush Speech (Folks, I really don't relish the next words)RUSH

rushlimbaughshow ^ | 1/17/2003 | RushLimbaugh

[Dane]

Did you know that Todd AND Rush are admittedly going to vote for a socialist in 2004????

I just find it funny that Todd blames Bush, even when the Bush administration wrote a brief against the Michigan Law school affirmative action program.

And that Todd is silent that the swing vote was a Reagan appointee, O'Connor.

Todd by your "reasoning" isn't Reagan the socialist.

[Dilbert56]

This will work out in the long run. If SCOTUS came down too hard, the Democrats in the Senate would have all the ammunition they need to fillibuster the President's nominees. The Democrat candidates would have been handed a ready-made campaign issues to keep the African American vote on the plantation.

This waffling nonsense keeps the issue murky until after the 2004 elections. Then, with a few more Senate seats in the GOP camp, the President can get his nominees through. He better find some judges with backbones that remain strong and brains that don't go fuzzy. We don't need SCOTUS deciding: What makes up the game of Golf", "How many admission points can I based on race before it's illegal", etc. We need judges who will issue clear, firm decisions and stay out of legislating from the bench.

[Howlin]

Good point, Dil.

[TLBSHOW]

Bush said one thing and wrote another thing.

The buck stopped at the Bush desk. He could of done the right thing, but nope more of trashing the constitution like he did with CFR.

[Howlin]

I guess this thread is dead now; Rush has moved on to talking about the Democratic forum over the weekend, so there will be no more cut and pastes.

[Carolinamom]

MAYDAY, the international distress code, is Todd's stated and official flip-flop day.

Will/Should there be an official welcoming party to the Bushbots' club/clique for Todd come May 2004? Will there be a vote on his being admitted, or does his act of voting for Bush automatically make him a member of the Bushbots?

[Dane]

The buck stopped at the Bush desk. He could of done the right thing, but nope more of trashing the constitution like he did with CFR

LOL! Todd you don't even have a 100 cents(a buck) in your head. The Bush administration wrote a brief against the Michigan law school practice, and yet you blame him and not the Reagan appointee and swing vote, O'Connor.

Your sad, hypocritical, and fruitless agenda is out in the open for all to see.

[Howlin]

I think we should take a look at his past statements and then have a vote.

[Howlin]

According to Todd, "the right thing" would have been if Bush had asked the Supreme Court to make a ruling that did not address the case in front of them.

[Fred Mertz]

Bush said one thing and wrote another thing.

But in Dane's little parallel universe it's all Ross Perot's fault. Go figure.

[Dane]

But in Dane's little parallel universe it's all Ross Perot's fault. Go figure.

Well most people on FR, IMO, know Fred, that you can't figure yourself out of a paper bag, so here it is again.

Perot helped elect Clinton. Clinton got to appoint 2 Supreme Court Justices(Ginsberg and Breyer), who were integral in this decision, as was Reagan appointee O'Connor and Bush 41 appointee, Souter.

But Todd wants to blame GW Bush exclusively, which brings out his hypocrisy or naive ignorance on the machinations of Supreme Court selections.

But, what the hey you and Todd can have your ignorant political orgy, putting all the blame on GW, even when the facts are pointed out to you.

[TLBSHOW]

Strange isn't it.. in their world of false spin they believe what they post. LOL

[Howlin]

So you're admitting you post stuff you don't believe?

Interesting.

[Carolinamom]

Dare I hope for your answer to what do you mean by "false spin"?

[Dane]

Strange isn't it.. in their world of false spin they believe what they post. LOL

And from the bizarro Todd world, you are basically stating that you don't believe what you post.

JMO, Todd, get out of your bizarro world.

[Lady Eileen]

Thanks Dilbert56...I hope you are right.

[TLBSHOW]

You know just what I said. And it was not about me.

[Dane]

You know just what I said.

Yes and from your reply #332, it is that you don't believe anything you post. JMO, you post to bring the focus to you while using third parties words as your own.

And it was not about me

JMO, but everything you post on FR is about you and only you, Todd.

[aristeides]

Here's a link to Novak's column on Olson, the White House, and the amicus briefs.

[TLBSHOW]

President Applauds Supreme Court Decision Statement by the President

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/934156/posts?page=