White House Brief Stops Short of Bush Speech (Folks, I really don't relish the next words)RUSH

rushlimbaughshow ^ | 1/17/2003 | RushLimbaugh

[jammer]

The first response was in response to what Bush SAID. The second response was in response to what Bush really did. No inconsistency there except in the dishonesty of Bush.

[jammer]

BTW, Howlin, I have watched your posts for a long time. You are definitely a #3.

[Howlin]

Well, then how do you explain the fact that he proclaimed Bush that greatest president in history that very night AFTER he posted the second response?

BTW, I've seen you post too; and I'm pretty glad we don't agree on anything.

[copycat]

They won't take a specific and expand it to a general,because they were not asked to-even if every Justice felt AA was wrong.

Right, they will not expand the specific to a general, as some here think Bush should have argued for. What will happen is, if they find for the complaintants in the UM case, it establishes once and for all that using race in any way on admissions is a violation of equal protection.

They only have to rule on the one case, and it establishes PRECEDENT for all future cases. Once that happens, universities wishing to avoit being sued will adjust their rules. A few may be sued, but with the precedent established, the colleges would lose.

This is the way it always is with the Supremes. For example, Roe v. Wade was a ruling on a specific case, but it set a precendent for abortion litigation across the country.

[TLBSHOW]

The first response was in response to what Bush SAID. The second response was in response to what Bush really did.

No inconsistency there except in the dishonesty of Bush.

unlike those that won't see the truth here

[Howlin]

To: PhiKapMom

Thanks for this post and thanks to President Bush the Greatest President in History!

5 posted on 01/15/2003 5:07 PM EST by TLBSHOW (Free Republic The #1 Stickest site on the web where the hardest part is clicking away...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

[MJY1288]

Well Howlin, I see "Flipper" is still at it. And I noticed that the 6'6" 365lb Dog wrestler went whining to Jim like the little man he is. "They're picking on me Jim, Tell'em to stop Jim, Please Jim, They called me vile names Jim, Let me take you sky divin Jim"

Remind me to give little Joey a tissue so he can wipe the brown stuff off his nose :-)

[Wild Irish Rogue]

Again,thanks for the clarification.

[TLBSHOW]

Posted on 01/15/2003 5:03 PM EST by PhiKapMom


Remarks by the President on the Michigan Affirmative Action Case

The Roosevelt Room


4:30 P.M. EST To: PhiKapMom


Thanks for this post and thanks to President Bush the Greatest President in History!


5 posted on 01/15/2003 5:07 PM EST by TLBSHOW (Free Republic The #1 Stickest site on the web where the hardest part is clicking away...........)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/823326/posts?page=6#6

[Howlin]

You are so busted as a fraud.

[TLBSHOW]

Make up your mind *fraud* either you want me to stop posting to you as you say and as you say you won't post to me or you don't.

Please for once howlin make up your mind.

You are so busted as a fraud. LOL "Flipper"

AND YOU DO KNOW I CAN SOURCE THIS ONE BIG TIME!

[Howlin]

No selective cutting and pasting this time though. Be sure to include the one where I said I didn't want you to post to me, but that I would be correcting any lies you told.

As anybody can see, you've kept me plenty busy.

[MJY1288]

When the 2 students win this case, I'm gonna be chuckling for days, As these miserable malcontents claim that they deserve the credit because they were the ones who kept the Justices of the Supreme Court feet to the fire. And how Bush almost blew it. HA

[TLBSHOW]

I can't wait for the Rush Limbaugh show next week, he must be lolrof at this thread! LOL

[Howlin]

It's a pretend world some live in. Reality must really bite.

[Joe Hadenuf]

Thats funny comin from you. LOL!

You and your race baiting clique have to tag team while hitting the panic/abuse button. Personally I have only hit it once, and that's when I tired of your Maryland, east coast race baiting. Then I discovered that you were sitting on the moderators lap, while he was burping you. I guess that AM was part of your homeowners associtation, type clique.

I have noticed more than a few lately have strayed from the party line. You and your cliquesters have your work cut out for you.

Are you not the guy that doesn't know where he actually resides? LOL! I get a kick out of you liberal Republicans. A true party boy.

[justshe]

Oh.......the INNER conflicts that must occur.
The agony...the pain....

WHO WILL WIN?
WHO WILL EMERGE VICTORIOUS?
WHO WILL BE THE ULTIMATE SURVIVOR?

[mrustow]

See also:

Bush: My Quotas are Better Than Yours!

[mrustow]

TLBSHOW, You must win the case first in order to set precidence, and build from there. This case is the start, not the whole ball of wax.

Wrong! If "diversity" in any form is permitted to stand as constitutional, there is no progress, because the precedent is a bad one. Constitutional cases are not chess games; such "subtle," "clever" thinking exhausts itself with strategies and tactics, when principles are what are called for. You could win the case, but lose the Constitution. We can't take many more "wins" like that.

[jammer]

Thank you so much for the link. I have emailed it to my friends.