Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Phony Faith-Based Initiative
Worldnetdaily ^ | January 17, 2003 | By Joseph Farah

Posted on 01/17/2003 1:33:26 AM PST by Uncle Bill

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Askel5
SOURCE

"Every Child in America entering school at the age of five is mentally ill, because he comes to school with certain allegiances toward our founding fathers, toward our elected officials, toward his parents, toward a belief in a supernatural Being, toward the sovereignty of this nation as a separate entity. It's up to you teachers to make all of these sick children well by creating the international children of the future." - Taken from an address given at a childhood education seminar in 1973 by professor Chester M. Pierce of educational psychiatry at Harvard University speaking for the Association for Childhood Education International.

"The battle for humankind's future must be waged and won in the public school classroom by teachers who correctly perceive their role as the proselytizers of a new faith. ....The classroom must and will become an arena of conflict between the old and the new--the rotting corpse of Christianity and the new faith of Humanism." - "A Religion for a New Age," The Humanist - January/February 1983, p. 26.

Secular Humanism is now the established religion in American public schools.

Secular Humanism is a religion in the same way that Hinduism and Buddhism are religions.

The doctrines of Humanism have been set forth in two Humanist Manifestos.[1] The first tenet of Manifesto I states:

"Religious humanists regard the universe as self-existing and not created."

The United States Supreme Court has identified Secular Humanism as a religion. It ruled that the First Amendment grants the same protection and imposes the same limitations on the "religion of Secular Humanism" as are applicable to other religions.[2]

In another Supreme Court decision, Justice Clark stated, "The State may not establish a 'religion of secularism' in the sense of affirmatively opposing or showing hostility to religion, thus 'preferring those who believe in no religion over those who do believe.' "[3]

1. Humanist Manifesto I and II, 1933, 1973.
2. Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 US 488 (1961).
3. Abington School District v. Schempp, 374, US 203, 83 S. Ct. 1560, 10 L.Ed.2d 844 (1963).


Get out your wallets, the faith in nothing is coming
21 posted on 01/17/2003 3:57:57 AM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
Stay safe my friend.
That isn't totally in my control, though I'll work as safely as I always do. So much depends on so many others.
22 posted on 01/17/2003 3:59:44 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
I can see the regulator communists taking over this country one inch at a time. Everyone, buy a rifle and get training to use it. Your probably going to need it in the future if things keep going the way they are. Also, don't forget to stock up on food and water storage.
23 posted on 01/17/2003 4:29:02 AM PST by 2nd_Amendment_Defender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RLK; 2nd_Amendment_Defender
A Problem With Guns?
"Americans were once self-confidently independent self-reliant mentalities. As a predominant American characteristic, that died out with the demographic and cultural descendency of the last of the great generations of Americans born in the early 1900s. In the last four decades Americans have become highly suggestible conformists who fear what they are told to fear, and accept what they are told to accept. They have been conditioned to live in absolute fear of even minor social criticism -- reality doesn't control their thinking, social fear does. In their lack of confidence and softness they need the entire world as a psychological support group. If someone in a TV studio 1,000 miles away representing what is presented as the cultural consensus stamps his foot, many Americans move to get on the latest wave of hysteria portrayed in a virtual reality that is kept uncontested by any other allowed presentation, even though what is being said is an obvious lie or completely irrational.

The American population has become a collection of programmed hysterical unthinking herds.

24 posted on 01/17/2003 4:49:57 AM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
Did I write that? Some of this stuff is better than I thought at the time.
25 posted on 01/17/2003 4:54:19 AM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RLK
It's excellent!
26 posted on 01/17/2003 5:27:40 AM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
Thanks! For the ping and I will read later.
27 posted on 01/17/2003 5:39:50 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
Why is anyone surprised? After all, bush has given us a Gestapo and Fatherland laws, oops, excuse me, I mean "patriot and "homeland" false security laws in addition to signing the CFR into law. He has spent $782,000,000,000 on NEW spending in in 2 years!

Can you say NEW WORLD ORDER, children?
28 posted on 01/17/2003 5:52:16 AM PST by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poet
Hi poet. Yes, indeed. It almost seems planned. Spooky even.. "October 5, 1999".

Let's pass more tyrannical laws, that should do it. Let's spend more money too, that will help.

29 posted on 01/17/2003 6:19:00 AM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
Hi poet. Yes, indeed. It almost seems planned. Spooky even.. "October 5, 1999".



Thanks to Bob Barr it ain't going to happen!
30 posted on 01/17/2003 6:45:14 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CONSPIRACY - Remarks by U.S. Representative Bob Barr
31 posted on 01/17/2003 7:00:31 AM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill; kristinn
BUMP TO BARR
32 posted on 01/17/2003 7:02:49 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Feds Seek To Oust Gold Miner

Forest Service says 40-year resident of historic town trespassing

Worldnetdaily
By Sarah Foster
January 16, 2003
Source

It may be a close call, but help is on the way for a beleaguered, small-scale gold miner that the U.S. Forest Service wants to oust from an abandoned mining town that's been his home nearly 40 years.

Gerald "Jerry" Fennell, 61, is the last of the independent gold miners in the Jicarilla Mountains in south-central New Mexico, and one of the few remaining in the state.

Under orders sent last October by the Forest Service, Fennell had until yesterday to pack up and clear out or face trespassing charges. But with help from a local group and folks in the area who are rallying 'round, he's going to dig in his heels and fight.

"We'll be asking for an injunction to stop the eviction," says Jay Walley, communications director at the Paragon Foundation, a nonprofit public-policy organization in Alamogordo, N.M., that focuses on land rights and public access to federal lands. "From what we can tell, the Forest Service does not own those buildings where Jerry's living and has his mine – the question is, who does? In any case, there needs to be a closer look at this."

You won't find Jicarilla on a standard road map. It's "miles from nowhere," and to get there you must travel along a dirt forest road to the heart of the Lincoln National Forest. If you don't look sharp you just might miss it. Today it's a ghost town, but 75 years ago it was a small but thriving mining community. During the early 1930s, it had a population of some 300 people. There are only three buildings left – the church, the log schoolhouse and the former general store that Fennell moved into in 1997. The nearest town is Carrizozo, population 1060, located 30 miles to the southwest.

Sitting on a gold mine

Fennell owns several mining claims in the area, and what's left of the town sits on one of them. A 1988 article in the International California Mining Journal estimates there's a bonanza of $20 million in fine gold in the 1,920 acres that make up his mining claim, but he limits his operation to a swimming pool-size pit behind the store, which he works with a pickaxe and shovel, hauling the ore by wheelbarrow or with the help of a burro named "Dusty."

Last summer, Walley traveled to Jicarilla to meet the long-time resident gold miner and see his place first hand.

He keeps his efforts "small by design and philosophy," wrote Walley in an Aug. 18 report for newssite Sierra Times.

"I keep it that way because I don't want to disturb the land more than I have to; I just take enough gold to get by," Fennell told Walley. "I don't use any chemicals and darn little water."

As there is no natural supply of water at his home, what water he uses he draws from a well down the road, hauling it back in an aging pickup truck. A generator supplies electricity for lights and a computer. He has a few chickens running about that he keeps for eggs, and a goat for milk.

Fennell told Walley he had "recently" received a letter from the Lincoln National Forest office stating he'll be charged with trespassing unless he prepares various papers and forms, which he claims would likely put him out of business.

Specifically, the service is demanding that he file a "plan of operation" – a document describing the extent of his operation, the equipment to be used, restoration plans and other details. It's a standard request demanded of those wishing to mine or log or otherwise obtain resources from federal land. But applicants have found that when completed, further demands are made for ratcheting up requirements, thereby making it very difficult if not impossible for small-scale entrepreneurs like Fennell to operate.

"Once I file the paper [a plan of operation], the Forest Service will impose such a huge reclamation bond that I won't be able to afford it," he explained. "I have watched them do it to my neighbors. They are all gone now. I am the last miner in the Jicarilla Mountains."

Although they insist Fennell should jump through a series of bureaucratic hoops, the Forest Service and its employees say they object only to his living arrangements, which they regard as squatting.

"Fennell has a legal right to his claim, but he is illegally occupying cabins that are on national forest land," Lincoln National Forest ranger Jerry Hawks told Walley.

But Fennell has a copy of a 1999 ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that says miners can live on their claims if they can produce possessory title and vested rights for structures and equipment.

And according to Walley, he does have tax records showing he has paid taxes on the structures and equipment for years.

Recently, Rene Romo of the Albuquerque Journal visited Fennell, and talked with Johnny Wilson, Forest Service's recreation and lands staff officer.

As far as Wilson and the Forest Service are concerned, Fennell doesn't run a true mining operation, Romo reported, despite his having a home "littered with various types of equipment used to sift through fine, dry dirt."

"He [Fennell] has done what is called prospecting – a pick and shovel operation," said Wilson.

"Well," Fennell retorts, "how have I made a living all these years?"

He wouldn't tell Romo how much money he has made over the years, but Fennell did say that selling gold, at the current rate of about $351 per ounce on the spot market, has sustained him "for decades."

In October, Fennell received notice from the Forest Service that he had 90 days to pack up and get out, "without further changing the historic structures." That period was up yesterday, Jan. 15. Wilson told Romo that if he had not left by the deadline, the agency would seek a court order for eviction. The next step would be for Fennell and the Forest Service to battle it out in court over whether the long-time resident has the right to live on his mining claim and who actually owns or has the right to control what remains of the town of Jicarilla. T

hat latter is a major bone of contention, since the Forest Service claims the buildings as its own. According to Fennell, the congregation of the Jicarilla Community Church used the old school house as a chapel until a few days before last Easter, when the Forest Service padlocked the door and posted a sign reading:

"PROPERTY of THE UNITED STATES" and warning "All Persons Are Prohibited Under Penalty of the Law from Committing Any Trespass."

At their meeting in August, Fennell showed Walley an envelope stuffed with "well-thumbed documents" he has collected over the last few years.

"Look at this," he exclaimed, selecting a record dealing with the schoolhouse. "This building has been used as a church since the '30s. How can the Forest Service just padlock and post it?"

And if he leaves, what will happen to the buildings? The Forest Service admits having no plans for restoration – it just doesn't want Fennell or anyone else living there.

"For years I have watched and cared for this building [the now-locked church] and the others," Fennell remarked. "If the Forest Service pushes me out, in a couple of weeks what is left of this little village will be vandalized or bulldozed and burned by the feds."

Fennell said he has asked the Forest Service to prove they even own the land on which his claim is located. Being in the middle of a forest is not automatic proof of federal ownership. There may be private, state and county holdings.

"All they have provided is a copy of an executive order signed by President Woodrow Wilson that indicates certain lands must be taken to connect the Lincoln National Forest to another national forest," said Fennell. "As best as I can determine through my research, this land may not even belong to the Forest Service."

Walley describes the title trail as "incredibly convoluted." Besides successive ownership by Spain, Mexico and the Republic of Texas, Jicarilla has been part of three New Mexico counties over the past hundred years, as boundaries were shifted. The Lincoln County tax assessor's office admitted, "There is really no way to know where all the records for Jicarilla are located."

Fennell is not saying he owns Jicarilla, but he is questioning the jurisdiction of the U.S. Forest Service. As he sees it, there are other more likely owners than the U.S. Forest Service.

"I've told them [the Forest Service], you show me proof of ownership, and it's over. I'm gone," Fennell explained to Romo. "The only thing I'm claiming here is the mining claim, my mine and the houses. The town, the history, the land belongs to the state of New Mexico, the county of Lincoln and the people. That's my firm position."

33 posted on 01/17/2003 7:38:29 AM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
"Let's pass more tyrannical laws, that should do it."

I've added a stanza since my prior posting due to the recent "homeland" law":

In the Name Of Security

The p.a.t.r.i.o.t act sticks in my craw
because it’s really a Gestapo Law,
the FBI gets more powers,
to spy on us 24 hours

In the name of security

Let’s not forget history,
of what happened in Germany,
the majority went along,
gathered in public throngs,
embracing all the wrongs

In the name of security

Cameras here, cameras there,
cameras everywhere.
on the corners, in the mall,
as our freedoms fall,
attached to traffic lights,
losing our privacy rights

In the name of security

Soon we’ll get ID cards,
as they build more prison yards,
they want us to watch the other guy,
an entire nation to spy

In the name of security

Giving power to strangers,
to people we don’t know,
presents future dangers,
as their power continues to grow

In the name of security

Ben Franklin said it best,
want to be like all the rest?
trade liberty for security,
then, only those in power will be free

In the name of security

Justification has begun,
we must keep terrorists on the run,
in the name of security,
you must give up your privacy

Now comes the "homeland" act,
can anyone deny the fact,
that America is no longer free,
all in the name of "security"?

Give it up for security,
just don’t include me,
you want safety,
I want to be free

Copyright © 2002 By John J. Lindsay. All Rights Reserved
June 1, 2002



34 posted on 01/17/2003 8:40:37 AM PST by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: poet
Thanks poet. Excellent.

"My only enemy is right-wing religious fundamentalism."

In Phoenix, We're Terrorists!

THE FBI AND THE MAD BOMBERS

"We're going to have to give up some of our liberties"
Frank Keating Governor, Oklahoma - September 11, 2001 - CNN Radio.
National Security

"We are the only ones who know what is good for the country, and we are the only ones who can do anything about it."
FBI Special Agent Joseph G. Deegan - 1977
Source

"The FBI spent $3 million of your tax money to blow up the World Trade Center." - Joseph Farah

GOVERNMENT TERRORISM - From Ruby Ridge To Waco And Beyond

FBI Spies on Catholic Bishops - Insight Magazine


"We are potentially the most dangerous agency in the country,"
FBI Director Louis Freeh - testimony before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime on June 5, 1997.

35 posted on 01/17/2003 9:46:47 PM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
Bttt
36 posted on 01/22/2003 12:48:33 AM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: america-rules
ping
37 posted on 01/22/2003 1:43:03 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RLK; Uncle Bill
Did I write that? Some of this stuff is better than I thought at the time.
Oh, man! That was worth the revisit to the thread alone UB!
38 posted on 01/23/2003 2:41:49 PM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
Bump!
39 posted on 01/24/2003 6:52:43 PM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
BBAY!
40 posted on 01/24/2003 8:27:18 PM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson