Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Connecting the War on Guns & Drugs [my title]
SHOTGUN NEWS ^ | 1/11/03 | Amicus Populi

Posted on 01/11/2003 10:15:11 AM PST by tpaine

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 741-748 next last
To: Texaggie79
Well, then you CERTAINLY won't buy land in this country, or any country I can think of.

Does squatting count?

521 posted on 01/22/2003 6:59:43 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies]

To: anobjectivist
Hey genious, if we make drugs legal, who in their right mind will market legal cocaine, heroin, crack, and the like??{psssst ever hear of the tobacco liability lawsuits???}REMEMBER THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY MOTTO :" GIVE ME LIBRIUM, OR GIVE ME METH"
522 posted on 01/22/2003 7:06:34 PM PST by BOOTSTICK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
Good grief. Most drugs are already legal.

Just this last week a women in a suv pulled out in front of my cousin totalling his Camaro. He called me and I rushed to the scene since it was nearby as he had just left my office.

I stood on the curb observing the scene of the accident as she was arrested. From her behavior I assumed she was drunk. Turns out she was driving under the influence of prescribed and legal drugs...and not one of those "illicit" ones that you fear which obviously inhibited her ability to drive.

Could you have prevented her with a law?





523 posted on 01/22/2003 7:55:22 PM PST by takenoprisoner (stand for freedom or get the helloutta the way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Roscoe: "Does squatting count?"

I believe that is what you do here. Does it count? Nope
524 posted on 01/22/2003 8:45:58 PM PST by takenoprisoner (stand for freedom or get the helloutta the way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK
bootstick asks: "who in their right mind will market legal cocaine, heroin, crack, and the like?"

Who in their right mind markets any drugs? Hello, pharmaceutical companies do. Have you been injured by a legally prescribed drug? If so, there are innumerable TV lawyers pleading for your case.

525 posted on 01/22/2003 8:52:10 PM PST by takenoprisoner (stand for freedom or get the helloutta the way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 522 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner
Libertarian beliefs bear little resemblance to reality.
526 posted on 01/23/2003 12:21:59 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Nothing is 'real' to a delusionary roscoe.
527 posted on 01/23/2003 6:57:31 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 526 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
In other words, you have no citation for your outlandish contention that FedGov or the States own all the land, is that about the sum of it?
528 posted on 01/23/2003 8:05:39 AM PST by dcwusmc ("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
"when your local government votes on local laws" these laws must conform to the base principles of our constitution.

No friggin duh. And to bad for you local and state drug laws, in no way, violate the USC.

529 posted on 01/23/2003 8:22:57 AM PST by Texaggie79 (seriously joking or jokingly serious, you decide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Well, I guess, since squatting is basically acting like you own all rights to the land, most uninformed people do just that.
530 posted on 01/23/2003 8:25:23 AM PST by Texaggie79 (seriously joking or jokingly serious, you decide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner
Could you have prevented her with a law?

But you must ask, what WORSE would she be on if everything were legal and accessible.

531 posted on 01/23/2003 8:26:30 AM PST by Texaggie79 (seriously joking or jokingly serious, you decide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 523 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc
The "citation" is at your local courthouse, are you too lazy to go look it up? Go read what rights you have to your land and tell me if you have ALL rights to your land.

Where else would you think I would be able to use as a source to prove this to you?

532 posted on 01/23/2003 8:28:43 AM PST by Texaggie79 (seriously joking or jokingly serious, you decide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 528 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
Since they seem to believe that property ownership is some kinda free lunch, squatting seemed an apt analogy.

"It is agreed by those who have seriously considered the subject, that no individual has, of natural right, a separate property in an acre of land, for instance. By an universal law, indeed, whatever, whether fixed or movable, belongs to all men equally and in common, is the property for the moment of him who occupies it, but when he relinquishes the occupation, the property goes with it. Stable ownership is the gift of social law, and is given late in the progress of society." --Thomas Jefferson

533 posted on 01/23/2003 8:46:42 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 530 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
Hey, it's my land so I can dig up all these department of water and power pipes, can't I?
534 posted on 01/23/2003 8:48:31 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
It figures, Roscoe. So you'd favor letting R. Kelly define pedophilia. It's the same thing, after all. Government does NOT DEFINE our rights. We are BORN with them. The sole legitimate function of government is to protect the equal rights of ALL. No more, no less. Our rights include anything we wish to do which does not require an UNWILLING outside party to fulfill. And government's function is NOT to protect people from themselves, keep property values high or rob one group of people to pay for the fantasies of another group, such as WODDIES.
535 posted on 01/23/2003 8:57:13 AM PST by dcwusmc ("The most dangerous man, to any governmeot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc
"It is agreed by those who have seriously considered the subject, that no individual has, of natural right, a separate property in an acre of land, for instance. By an universal law, indeed, whatever, whether fixed or movable, belongs to all men equally and in common, is the property for the moment of him who occupies it, but when he relinquishes the occupation, the property goes with it. Stable ownership is the gift of social law, and is given late in the progress of society." --Thomas Jefferson
536 posted on 01/23/2003 9:02:50 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
Cite a law that says that government owns all the land. If it's true, I'm sure you can do that. It must be there, right? Cite one law that says so. Is that asking too much? Must be, because there IS NO SUCH LAW. And if you'd lie about this, what else would you NOT lie about?
537 posted on 01/23/2003 9:02:57 AM PST by dcwusmc ("The most dangerous man, to any governmeot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
Therefore, when your local government votes on local laws, those very laws are directly effecting the land you own rights to.
It is subject to them, and any violation of them is punishable by government.
-ta79-

Lord but you are dense.

The issue is, that "when your local government votes on local laws" these laws must conform to the base principles of our constitution.
- You deny this simple fact.
519 tpaine


No friggin duh. And to bad for you local and state drug laws, in no way, violate the USC.
529 -ta79-

There you go again, proving my point. You deny, deny, deny. - Weird.
538 posted on 01/23/2003 9:16:22 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 529 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
takenoprisoner:
"Could you have prevented her with a law?"


But you must ask, what WORSE would she be on if everything were legal and accessible.
531 -ta79-

No, a rational person would not 'ask' that at all. -- You have once again demonstrated your near total inablity to comprehend the role of the rule of law in a free republic.
It is, imo, a constitutional principle, a 'given', that law does not/cannot prevent misbehavior. It can only punish.
539 posted on 01/23/2003 9:42:19 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc
"A right of property in moveable things is admitted before the establishment of government. A separate property in lands, not till after that establishment. The right to moveables is acknowledged by all the hordes of Indians surrounding us. Yet by no one of them has a separate property in lands been yielded to individuals. He who plants a field keeps possession till he has gathered the produce, after which one has as good a right as another to occupy it. Government must be established and laws provided, before lands can be separately appropriated, and their owner protected in his possession. Till then, the property is in the body of the nation, and they, or their chief as trustee, must grant them to individuals, and determine the conditions of the grant." --Thomas Jefferson
540 posted on 01/23/2003 11:12:18 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 528 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 741-748 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson