Skip to comments.
Democrats are liars, Republicans are stupid
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| 12/30/02
| Joseph Farah
Posted on 12/30/2002 4:13:26 PM PST by Republic of Texas
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
I couldn't agree more.
To: Republic of Texas
What's the difference? The repubs wont put up a fight. I suppose they are serious, though(sarcasm).
Remember, according to present and past behavior on behalf of the repubs, bipartisanship means: conceding small amounts to the democrats, rather than winning any concessions at all.
2
posted on
12/30/2002 4:23:25 PM PST
by
galt-jw
To: galt-jw
Sometimes it means conceding small things to the Dims, sometimes it means conceding the whole agenda to them.
To: Republic of Texas
Republicans try to get the truth out, and I heard this information on the radio a few days back. But you do not hear these facts on NBC, CBS, and ABC. Many of us do not get cable tv and all we get is the disinformation of these three networks. For the last several nights we are spoon fed how wonderful Sen. Hillary Clinton is. In fact we get to see her face as she attacks republicans and President Bush. President Bush's statements are read and we only see a bad picture of him while they read what he has said. It is kind of hard to go up against these lies everyday when the dems have Tom, Dan, and Peter attacking Repubs or some other reporter doing it for them on their news show.
To: Republic of Texas
Conceding hell, they've been spearheading rat legislation lately.
Too bad there aint some sort of genetic test for conservatism...cause I'm sure there are more than a few rats in elephant clothing up yonder.
EBUCK
5
posted on
12/30/2002 4:32:20 PM PST
by
EBUCK
To: HoundsTooth_BP
State Sen. Burton Switches To Mississippi GOP
Former Newton Mayor First Elected To Senate In 1991
Burton said few people in Mississippi "share the liberal views of the National Democratic Party" and they aren't made to feel welcome any more.
http://www.thejacksonchannel.com/news/1861094/detail.html
No point in giving the rats anything but a swift kick back to the stone age!
6
posted on
12/30/2002 4:37:07 PM PST
by
TLBSHOW
To: Republic of Texas
Repubs are stipid and scared
7
posted on
12/30/2002 4:40:16 PM PST
by
WKB
To: HoundsTooth_BP
What percentage of Americans get their news from NBCBSABCNN? They seem to be closing their news divisions.
8
posted on
12/30/2002 4:40:44 PM PST
by
gitmo
To: TLBSHOW
There's always hope that people all over the country will wake up. I just hope Sen. Clinton has only one term at anything.
To: Republic of Texas
That's all fine and good, but Mr. Farah doesn't seem to be aware or concerned that one of his own columnists is spreading that very same lie on his web site right now.
In addition to stating on FNC that she hopes that we do poorly in the war so that Bush will not be re-elected, Ratner's current column on WND tells the same blatant lie that Farah is complaining about in this article.
From Ratner's column:
"...they will succeed in ... in ... in turning an awful budget deficit into a horrific one and such will force them to actually raise taxes on ... on ... on the backs of the working class.
"Think I made this up? Nah! It is already being reported that the White House has directed the Treasury Department to study the possibility of raising taxes on the bottom 50 percent of income earners."
10
posted on
12/30/2002 4:44:06 PM PST
by
alnick
To: gitmo
I do not know the percentages, but many people in rural America still do not have cable or satellite.
To: HoundsTooth_BP
Internet & Talk Radio. If they want truth.
12
posted on
12/30/2002 4:51:13 PM PST
by
gitmo
To: Republic of Texas
Republicans raised more than Democrats from individuals who contributed small and medium amounts of moneyThis has been the pattern for years. The media will simply not report it.
13
posted on
12/30/2002 5:03:36 PM PST
by
Stultis
To: alnick
It is already being reported that the White House has directed the Treasury Department to study the possibility of raising taxes on the bottom 50 percent of income earners."I wish that could be true. Today, something like 48% of the voting population pays no income taxes at all. That's dangerous for the economy. When over half the voters can vote to make the highest earners pay more tax, we get more lower income people and fewer entrepenuers or business folk.
It's only when all of the voters are equally invested in gov't that we can get responsible gov't.
To: HoundsTooth_BP
It's good to hope for a better future, it better to Pray about it.
15
posted on
12/30/2002 5:52:48 PM PST
by
webber
To: alnick
Demonratner is as believable as her secret lover Klinton, no not Bill, Hillary.
16
posted on
12/30/2002 5:55:19 PM PST
by
webber
To: galt-jw
Both parties are stupid. They love to see this country being invaded by hordes of turd-world bottom feeders.
To: speekinout
When over half the voters can vote to make the highest earners pay more tax, we get more lower income peopleYour points are well taken. In addition, these voters will (directly or indirectly) vote themselves largesse from the government because someone else will have to pay for it. America the land of free money as long as you stay on the DemocRAT plantation where you can have "pride".
To: EBUCK
No argument there.
To: alnick
WND always posts one column from the left. That doesn't mean they agree with it. Conservatives win arguments on the facts. We shouldn't be afraid of any Liberal's opinion.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson