Skip to comments.
Local lawyers on 100-member Mexico council
Arizona Daily Star ^
| December 25, 2002
| Tim Steller
Posted on 12/25/2002 5:21:53 PM PST by HiJinx
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: HiJinx
To: Free the USA; Marine Inspector; Ajnin; agitator; Tancred; backhoe; Carry_Okie; Helix; Brownie74; ...
ping
22
posted on
12/26/2002 7:30:45 AM PST
by
madfly
To: HiJinx
Thank you. I wonder what kind of "rights" they're NOT getting here. They get free medical care, food, etc. What more do these greedy people want?
To: *immigrant_list; eye for an eye
ping
Comment #25 Removed by Moderator
Comment #26 Removed by Moderator
To: DLfromthedesert
I'm guessing they want to get their hands on their own piece of the prosperity that is America. Trouble is, that prosperity is a combination of resources and people using them wisely. I don't see that happening if Mexico 'annexes' the Southwest tier of states.
27
posted on
12/26/2002 8:00:51 AM PST
by
HiJinx
To: HiJinx
The Mexican lawyer (s) have made inroads into some of the more politically important Arizona families, some of them nationally known and many are lawyers. These young activists front for the illegal and the legal Mexican.
While the rights of some border property owners are being denied them i.e., protection - Mexicans legal and illegal are being given a leg up from our government and these legal activists.
Arizona has Mexican Conciliate offices in all major cities in the state, why do they now need 100 lawyers to represent them? It seems reasonable to me if they are here without the green card or any other pass, they are illegal and they have broken the law. They are now deported maybe, only to return the next day and with the help of lawyers that BEND the law and judges who cant READ the law and up hold it to protect the United States Constitution as they are sworn to do leaving the taxpayers of AZ and all other states picking up the tab for their (the illegal) comfy stay in the good ol U S of A. When did an illegal person obtain the right to a lawyer or any Constitutional rights at all? Where are the Constitutionalist scholars, why are they not being heard? Is it because the socialists in our congress and Senate have watered down the meaning of the words in our Constitution so much, they no longer apply to a Republic.
Did I mention the Invasion is REAL and our Sovereignty as a nation means very little to anyone in authority. By that I mean, those whom weve elected to carry out the Rule of Law according to our Constitution and the Declaration of Independence are failing to do so. The Citizen must now protect himself as those who are sworn to do so, are not.
28
posted on
12/26/2002 9:25:22 AM PST
by
yoe
To: HiJinx
But Mexico's consul in Tucson, Carlos Flores Vizcarra, said that his government's intent in forming the council is not to create a new U.S. branch. "It isn't a House of Representatives. It isn't a parliamentary assembly. But it is a representative entity and, therefore, will certainly voice the concerns of the Mexicans who are here," Flores Vizcarra said.
We're not really talking about ducks.
It isn't a white duck. It isn't a green duck. But it is a red duck and, therefore, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck.
To: yoe
"The citizen must protect himself..."
Which brings us to Spencer, Simcox, et al. The really bad part of this is that, as you said, the people who should be down here protecting us aren't, and aren't even so inclined. I'll be dam**d if I'll vote for these turkeys again...
30
posted on
12/26/2002 9:31:20 AM PST
by
HiJinx
To: HiJinx; madfly
Every American who collaborates with this Mexican invasion needs to be treated as a traitor and dealt with as one.
As for Jorge Bush, he needs to wake up and do something about the border or people like Spencer and Simcox will.
31
posted on
12/26/2002 9:35:20 AM PST
by
Sparta
To: HiJinx
32
posted on
12/26/2002 9:41:11 AM PST
by
archy
To: HiJinx
Open letter to Jane Hull:
The Honorable Jane Hull
Governor of Arizona 1700 West Washington
Phoenix, Arizona 85007
December 26, 2002
Dear Governor Hull,
I am truly appalled at this move to place a 100-member council created by Mexico's government to represent Mexicans living in the United States. Is this not illegal in itself and a violation of our National Sovereignty?
It has been opined that the Mexican government wants is a joint sovereignty with the United States over Mexican nationals living in this country and that is wrong. Americans are being denied their rights as Americans i.e., afforded the protection their government swore to give them and by the Constitution while illegal immigrants are enjoying rights they have no right to. And I might add, we taxpayers are paying for all these handouts from hospitals, to schools and welfare.
You have a few days left in office to address these wrongs, and like the Camels nose just under the tent, Vicente Foxs intentions are quite clear and he is ridding a wave of Political Correctness, which is stamping out the very meaning of the United States Constitution and the Arizona Constitution.
Governor Hull, this state is being invaded by illegal aliens and slick lawyers. Why would anyone obey the law when our elected do not. I would appreciate the courtesy of a reply.
Sincerely,
33
posted on
12/26/2002 10:36:54 AM PST
by
yoe
To: HiJinx
Let us be honest all these nations and their masses that have been dumped on our shores have one role model for political activism and that is Israel and its lobby. And if anyone in the conservative movement got serious about reducing the influence of immigrant lobbies for their old countries this would make the neo-conservatives highly agitated and most likely to come down hard on the conservatives who mention such unPC topics. Flame away but at least you should know what you face when begin tampering with before you start.
34
posted on
12/26/2002 11:05:01 AM PST
by
junta
Comment #35 Removed by Moderator
To: yoe
"...those whom weve elected to carry out the Rule of Law according to our Constitution and the Declaration of Independence are failing to do so. The Citizen must now protect himself as those who are sworn to do so, are not."
I wish these words were on very large billboards in every major city and viewed by millions every day.
36
posted on
12/26/2002 1:45:50 PM PST
by
Paulie
To: HiJinx
George Bush earlier this season announced that your either with us, or against us in the war on terrorism.... so Jorge please define us........? Tend to America first....part of the oath of the presidency is to DEFEND THE UNITED STATES, or did he convienently forget? Normally I support Bush 70%of the time, but the 30% wrong that he gets wrong is almost unforgiveably wrong on certain issues.
To: HiJinx
Yes, deliberately too.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson