Skip to comments.
Playboy girls are losing their curves
The Daily Telegraph ^
| December 20, 2002
| Celia Hall
Posted on 12/19/2002 5:11:38 PM PST by MadIvan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-134 next last
It's perfectly obvious to anyone who reads a newspaper or watches TV that the stick insect look is "in". But go on you lot, comment away - you know you want to. ;)
Regards, Ivan
1
posted on
12/19/2002 5:11:38 PM PST
by
MadIvan
To: Delmarksman; Sparta; Toirdhealbheach Beucail; TopQuark; TexKat; Iowa Granny; vbmoneyspender; ...
Bump!
2
posted on
12/19/2002 5:11:51 PM PST
by
MadIvan
To: MadIvan
Where are the photos so we can make our own evaluation......?
To: MadIvan
Alright. Some Freeper research is needed to verify. Where is the decades of compairisons (sic)?....
4
posted on
12/19/2002 5:13:52 PM PST
by
eureka!
To: MadIvan
Wait, this is Britain, right? Shouldn't a test of Playgirl be more appropriate? ;)
5
posted on
12/19/2002 5:16:09 PM PST
by
lelio
To: MadIvan
Anorexic is hip. I am un-hip. Or hippy. OK enough talk about hips.
To: MadIvan
Researchers in Toronto and Vienna studied 577 consecutive monthly issues of the magazine to compare models' measurements over nearly 50 years. OK. Where do I sign up?
7
posted on
12/19/2002 5:16:41 PM PST
by
IncPen
To: MadIvan
Is this tit for tat?
8
posted on
12/19/2002 5:17:06 PM PST
by
TRY ONE
To: IncPen
I will even bring my own tape!!
9
posted on
12/19/2002 5:18:21 PM PST
by
flyer182
To: MadIvan
I guess these days, there's so much silicon going around, the smaller pair promise authenticity, if nothing else. I'm surprised, though, to hear that hip to waist ratios are going down. As I recall, there was research that shows that a certain hip-to-waist ratio (regardless of a woman's weight and size) is a universal, cross-cultural turn-on. But, hey, things change.
10
posted on
12/19/2002 5:18:25 PM PST
by
bdeaner
To: MadIvan
Starting with mid 1974, I have every issue, plus about thirty or so from the 60s. They are in those vinyl or leather Playboy binders. Except for a few, umm, stains, here and there, they are in excellent shape. I really enjoy the articles. (Actually, the Pigsking Previews and the Basketball All-America predictions are pretty neat. "There is this guy, Mike Jordan, at North Carolina...")
To: MadIvan
Playboy seems to be scared to display any chix any heavier than 20 pounds underweight. Petra Verkaik is my ideal. I think the guy who chooses the chix for Playboy must be a homo since no real men like that current Playboy girl look. Oh, and Playboy, DITCH the implant chix too!
12
posted on
12/19/2002 5:20:18 PM PST
by
PJ-Comix
To: bdeaner
,,, they're all the same when the light goes out.
To: MadIvan
"577 consecutive monthly issues of the magazine to compare models' measurements over nearly 50 years."Any openings for this job?
Serioudly, I agree with this article 100%.
But, what do I know. I'm married twice and 0 for 4 on boobs.
To: AGreatPer
Any openings for this job? That's what I find unusual - it is serious enough for the Canadian and Austrian taxpayer to pick up the tab.
Regards, Ivan
15
posted on
12/19/2002 5:25:47 PM PST
by
MadIvan
To: shaggy eel
Now that is not true; but they all look better at closing time.
To: TruthShallSetYouFree
Starting with mid 1974, I have every issue,,, I used to run into the occasional issue at the barber's and I had a few issues during my teenage years. I used to love that Neon Vincent cartoon strip.
To: bdeaner
2/3,with hips=shoulders.
For men, 4/5,with shoulders wider - I forget the ratio (like, hey, who cares?)
18
posted on
12/19/2002 5:26:34 PM PST
by
patton
To: org.whodat
,,, I know. I'm just and old wind-up artist.
To: MadIvan
There is an answer:
"PLASTIC"
20
posted on
12/19/2002 5:31:25 PM PST
by
APBaer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-134 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson