Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fraud of the rings?
Independent.co.uk ^ | 13 December 2002 | Steve Jelbert

Posted on 12/14/2002 2:35:54 PM PST by ecurbh

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 12/14/2002 2:35:55 PM PST by ecurbh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2Jedismom; Alkhin; Anitius Severinus Boethius; AUsome Joy; austinTparty; Bear_in_RoseBear; ...

Ring Ping!!

2 posted on 12/14/2002 2:36:34 PM PST by ecurbh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
What a bunch of rambiling crappola. The author said nothing! Guess he was given the topic and a number of column inches he needed to fill. The title doesn't even go with the content. Poor devil of a sub-sub - wait, wrong author.
3 posted on 12/14/2002 2:40:27 PM PST by Puddleglum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
I only made it half way through. It is tripe. His criticisms are fabricated... woven out of air as he breaks wind.
4 posted on 12/14/2002 2:49:19 PM PST by My back yard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Puddleglum
What amazes me is the whole array of opinions on things you will find on FreeRepublic.

There will be many that stop by to this thread to whole-heartedly agree with the writer’s comments. Almost any movie, book, or object that you might think is universally enjoyed has a few raving against it. Being kind of a closet pragmatist I don't see that as a bad thing. Just interesting.

I got my free pass with the DVD set. I'll probably pick up a ticket for me and my wife on Tuesday for a Thursday show. I don't like the (first day) crowds.

5 posted on 12/14/2002 2:51:16 PM PST by avg_freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
I just realized the guy's problem is HE WAS NOT INVITED TO ANYTHING. And is so totally irrelevant.
6 posted on 12/14/2002 2:57:50 PM PST by My back yard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My back yard
potterhead...loves witchcraft---devils/orcs
7 posted on 12/14/2002 3:00:49 PM PST by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Puddleglum
What a bunch of rambiling crappola

Nicely put.

This article should be titled...."What a smart man I think I am".......Or... "I am full of myself"......Or.... "Watch me pretend to be above it all".

Crappola is a good description.

8 posted on 12/14/2002 3:01:10 PM PST by Tom Bombadil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
Most movie pre-publicity is anything but secretive. Often videos are distributed, and screenings are open to everybody from the regional press to the wage slave who sells you a copy of the original novel, in an unattractive new film tie-in cover. But press and public previews, just as with The Fellowship of the Ring, have been severely restricted...< snip > For The Two Towers they'll have to queue up with us multiplex cattle to see the whole thing.

Awww... his feeling are hurt. We didn't get a ticket to the VIP screenings.

9 posted on 12/14/2002 3:05:09 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
The author probably hates all of the good vs evil plotline, without all of those "gray areas" that liberals love so much.
10 posted on 12/14/2002 3:08:25 PM PST by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Puddleglum
What a bunch of rambiling crappola. The author said nothing!

Passing traffic bump.

11 posted on 12/14/2002 3:10:05 PM PST by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
Oh dear:

As it is, The Two Towers features a digitised Gollum, that grumpy, tortured creature, "dubbed" over a performance by Andy Serkis, last spotted in 24 Hour Party People playing grumpy, tortured record producer Martin Hannett, who would, if alive today, undoubtedly be using digital recording techniques.

His English Composition teacher just rolled over in her grave.

12 posted on 12/14/2002 3:15:49 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
So, if I understand this review correctly:

1) He hasn't read the book.

2) He hasn't seen the movie.

3) His nose is out of joint.

This is pretty much par for the course for The Independent.
13 posted on 12/14/2002 3:19:28 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
The sad truth is, the success of this trilogy has nothing much to do with film-making. There are just so many Tolkienies out there that it simply can't fail, such fans easily outnumbering the handful of loons who affect confusion between the movie's title and the World Trade Centre.

Nonsense. If it was lousy, the word would be out in no time and it would arrive with a thud like a falling troll. In fact the series (at lest the first one) is remarkably well done, visually stunning and faithful to the book.

The fact is this guy sounds like a critic who is desperately looking for some reason to pan it because he never liked Tolkien in the first place. Failing to find any, he resorts to general badmouthing about hypothetical next blockbusters and the way it was released.

14 posted on 12/14/2002 3:24:54 PM PST by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
...So an even halfway competent adaptation is worth hyping.

A good story doesn't necessarily equal a good movie. look at the Dune fiascos.
15 posted on 12/14/2002 3:43:32 PM PST by opbuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: ecurbh
It's only a movie... It's only a movie... It's only a movie...
17 posted on 12/14/2002 3:56:27 PM PST by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
Yuch! What an awfully written Review.

I wonder whether this clown had a deadline to meet, the subject assigned to him by the paper's Editor, a swollen jaw from being repeatedly hit by some deranged soccer hooligan, and a bad hangover from the after-the-match pub-crawling.

18 posted on 12/14/2002 4:17:08 PM PST by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorMichael
This is not even a review! This smarmy uthour just has his panties in a wad over the box-office behemoth that LOTR:TTT has become before it even releases. I went todqy to get my pre-sale tickets for TTT, and all but two of the showings on the 18th were already sold out.
19 posted on 12/14/2002 7:39:07 PM PST by Notforprophet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
a gloriously inappropriate way to promote the world's favourite modern pagan epic.

I stopped reading after this. And it's "Chirstmas", not "X-mas." Offending pagans! Oh, dear!

Perhaps reparations are in order.

20 posted on 12/14/2002 9:20:15 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson