Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Querillas" Seek Unisex Toilets at Stanford (PC MADNESS ALERT!)
Stanford Daily ^ | 11/27/02 | Alison Pierce

Posted on 12/09/2002 1:05:49 PM PST by MikalM

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: MikalM
THERE'S NO SUCH GENDER AS UNISEX.NEUTER MAYBE!
41 posted on 12/09/2002 2:33:00 PM PST by INSENSITIVE GUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikalM
Revealing that the author goes to such lengths to make the word queer PC neutral and then uses the word homophobia without giving it a second thought or even an explanation of it's coinage (for political purposes) less than a generation ago.
42 posted on 12/09/2002 3:14:36 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cryptical
Just so you don't try it at my house! :-)
43 posted on 12/09/2002 3:15:35 PM PST by Tax-chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
broadminded? Why you filthy sexist degenerate.... wait a minute..... I'm slurring degenerates... I'm being insensitive to the feelings of degenerates everywhere (sniff, sniff)...I must therefore severely chastise myself... without offending anyone of course.
44 posted on 12/09/2002 5:30:50 PM PST by driftless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MikalM
The group uses the word “queer” — which has been used as a pejorative term for homosexuals — in an academic sense. “Queer” is an identity category that was reclaimed partly as a political tool, the way African-Americans reclaimed the word “black” as a political identity. This perspective has been expressed by several academics, including Annamarie Jagose, a famous queer theorist.

Blacks didn't "reclaim" the word black, they chose it instead of sticking with Negro. This is pretty basic history. The word queer was "reclaimed;" it was originally a word created by the gays in order to describe themselves.

he group will broadcast a string of homophobic yet commonly used phrases in White Plaza. The voice will be mechanical to symbolize how automatic these patterns are.

Some examples are “What’s up? I’m straight,” “That’s so gay,” “Damn you faggot,” and “What’s up guys?”

“What’s up guys?” isn't homophobic--it's arguably anti-woman, if one was to say that to a mixed crowd of males and females, but it cannot be considered homophobic, even by the hairiest of feminists. It is, however, missing a comma. It's the job of the editors to insert those. The Stanford Daily has pretty shoddy editing, which isn't really surprising considering the editors are probably Stanford students. Student journalists, the pride and joy of the elite universities.... BARF

45 posted on 12/09/2002 5:42:15 PM PST by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikalM
"I hate that you people have taken that word. That's our word for making fun of you guys. First you ruin all the tough names like Lance and Julian and now you take queer from us...."

- Homer J. Simpson
46 posted on 12/09/2002 5:54:04 PM PST by amused
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cryptical
Maybe someday I can stop by Stanford, and marginalize and disenfranchise a number of groups at the same time by leaving the seat up!

They want guerilla tactics, we'll show 'em how it's done!

47 posted on 12/09/2002 5:56:50 PM PST by amused
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: All
This article made me remember an incident that happened at the gym last week. I went into the women's locker room (I'm female) to put my coat in a locker. You have to walk past the restroom stalls to get to the locker area. I was the only person in there except for one other person in a stall. I noticed as I walked past the stalls, that the feet were pointing the wrong direction but really didn't think too much about it. After I put my things in the locker I decided I needed to use the bathroom before I went out into the gym. I used the same stall as the other person and had to put the seat down first.

There's probably a perfectly logical explanation but I'm not sure.
48 posted on 12/09/2002 6:04:34 PM PST by muggs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
STAY TUNED for reports of rapes in these 'gender neutral' bathrooms...

I can see it coming!!!!!!!!!!
49 posted on 12/09/2002 8:02:53 PM PST by Astro Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Semaphore Heathcliffe
"Those guys are fags!" - JS, 1982

"Hey bud, what's your problem?"
"Fast Times at Ridgemont Hight" A funny movie
50 posted on 12/09/2002 8:15:51 PM PST by ElTianti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MikalM
I've no problem with separate bathrooms. While they're at it, they can have their own locker room too.
51 posted on 12/10/2002 12:45:17 AM PST by altair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks; dighton
"what's up, guys? "

What's up, doc?

52 posted on 12/10/2002 4:17:02 AM PST by BlueLancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer
In the scene where Wayne and Garth are sitting on the car by the airport, they were talking waiting for the planes to fly over. They started the scene and got through the dialogue right before when the plane was suppose to come. Only the plane was a little bit late. Spontaneously, Dana Carvey (Garth) asked Wayne if he found Bugs Bunny attractive when he put on a dress and played girl bunny. This was not in the script. You can tell by Wayne's laugh that it wasn't expected. Just then the plane came and the director decided to keep the line in the movie
53 posted on 12/10/2002 4:39:22 AM PST by glock rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
auto-ironists

Great word construct. Yours?

54 posted on 12/10/2002 5:20:57 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
Never thought about it 'til now.

I doubt it, but who knows? Ha.

It fit better than 'self-parodying', an ugly construct, imo.
55 posted on 12/10/2002 7:07:09 AM PST by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson