Posted on 12/09/2002 10:23:15 AM PST by ewing
I agree.
But then I've wanted Lott to leave for some time now.
DAVID FRUM'S DIARY
DEC. 9, 2002: MOMENTS OF TRUTH
Speak Up, Trent: Trent Lott did himself and the Republican party serious damage with an ill-judged remark at Strom Thurmonds 100th birthday party on Thursday and the damage is only growing.
Lott said:
I want to say this about my state: When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We're proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years, either.
According to Tom Edsall of the Washington Post, The gathering, which included many Thurmond family members and past and present staffers, applauded Lott when he said were proud of the 1948 vote. But when he said we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years if Thurmond had won, there was an audible gasp and general silence.
Edsall explained the reason for the gasp thus: Thurmond, then governor of South Carolina, was the presidential nominee of the breakaway Dixiecrat Party in 1948. He carried Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana and his home state. He declared during his campaign against Democrat Harry S. Truman, who supported civil rights legislation, and Republican Thomas Dewey [who it should be said supported civil rights rather more firmly than Harry Truman did]: All the laws of Washington and all the bayonets of the Army cannot force the Negro into our homes, our schools, our churches.
On July 17, 1948, delegates from 13 southern states gathered in Birmingham to nominate Thurmond and adopt a platform that said in part, We stand for the segregation of the races and the racial integrity of each race.
Lotts birthday remark drew scant attention at first. It was broadcast live on C-Span, but the only media source to take note of it on Friday morning was ABC.coms The Note. On another day, the Notes report might have triggered a media stampede, but the announcement of the firing of Paul ONeill and Larry Lindsey at 10:05 am on Friday obliterated all other Washington news.
Edsalls story appeared on Saturday morning, as did a more matter-of-fact one in South Carolinas The State. A spokesman issued a perfunctory clarification: Senator Lotts remarks were intended to pay tribute to a remarkable man who led a remarkable life. To read anything more into these comments is wrong. And that would seem to be that. Saturdays news was dominated by Iraqs nobody here but us chickens reply to Security Council Resolution 1441. On Saturday night Mary Landrieu pulled off her down-to-the-wire victory in the Louisiana Senate race.
The Lott story seems to have been left behind in the dust. And yet I cannot help thinking that this story is not over that Republicans will hear Lotts words quoted at them again and again in the months to come.
I for one do not believe Trent Lott is a racist or a segregationist. My guess is that his speechwriter gave him note cards with a few jokes, and that when Lott finished reading them, he launched himself into what he probably intended to be nothing more than a big squirt of greasy flattery.
But thats not what came out of Lotts mouth. What came out of his mouth was the most emphatic repudiation of desegregation to be heard from a national political figure since George Wallaces first presidential campaign. Lotts words suggest that one of the three most powerful and visible Republicans in the nation privately thinks that desegregation, civil rights, and equal voting rights were all a big mistake.
These would be disgraceful thoughts to think, if Lott thought them. If Lott thought them, any Republican who accepted his leadership would share in the disgrace. So Lott needs to make it clear that he does not in fact think them. He owes his party, his state, his country, and his conscience something more something much more than a curt I am sorry if you were offended. If he cant do that, Republicans need to make it clear that Lott no longer speaks for us.
Bush has no authority, nor desire, to get rid of Trent Lott.
The only place where there is an obsession to get rid of Trent Lott is Free Republic.
While I think he should be given a break I also know that the lefties will beat this into the ground. It's so typically dishonest of them.
And all the people who are making a big deal of Lott's stupid comment are helping to shackle all of us with PC speech codes.
It should come from his senate colleagues.
This was not just a gaffe. Or if it was, it was spectacularly ill-considered one.
It cannot just be swept under the carpet.
My sentiments exactly. That, and his lack of a spine.
I don't think he even realized that Thurmond's position back then was segregationist. He was just praising Thurmond as a long-time political leader. Lott wasn't being racist, he was being an idiot. But being an idiot alone is good enough reason to have him step down.
Forgot one needed trait...blood-thirsty.
Actually, Lott said nothing about "racial problems". I don't think race or racism was even on his mind when he was making the comment. He just said Thurmond could have helped "the problems we've had", type unspecified. It's only Jackson et al who are claiming that that was necessarily a reference to "racial problems".
It's not being swept anywhere. Lott's clarified it.
He got carried away with a tribute to an old man!
The overreaction here, as elsewhere, is reaching the point of hysteria.
Sure, if you engage your brain first -- something Lott is not always known to do.
Thurmond's run was over half a century ago. I doubt its particulars were fresh on Lott's mind. Lott has worked with Thurmond on a daily basis for the past zillion years, I'm sure his more recent interactions were a lot more in the forefront of Lott's memory than the ancient history.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.