Skip to comments.
Key Bali Suspect: U.S. Will Be Destroyed
ABC News ^
| 12/6/02
Posted on 12/06/2002 8:46:18 AM PST by areafiftyone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-159 last
To: JoeSixPack1
Freaks speaking about killing babies? Ah...you're one of those advocates of partial birth abortion.
To: tomahawk
I don't disagree that we have to deal with the evil threat of Jihadists. Do you share the view (proudly expressed by Cachelot) that we should respond to this threat by nuking millions of Muslim babies?
To: Aliska
So you want to nuke babies too eh?
To: abclily
I am saying nothing of the sort! I am merely disagreeing with posters who openly advocate killing millions of Muslim babies by nuking them. Don't you understand the difference between a targeted response directed at evil doers and genocide of innocents on a scale not even advocated by Hitler?
To: Austin Willard Wright
nuke babies? Huh?
I was talking to him about safety in travel. Nowhere have I advocated or supported nuking babies.
145
posted on
12/08/2002 10:20:16 AM PST
by
Aliska
To: Austin Willard Wright
In WWII did some innocent Nazi babies get killed or Japanese? Since the Muslims declared war (jihad) on us, it might not be our fault what happens when we go to defend ourselves. No one wants babies to be killed ---except possibly them which they would use to whip up publicity against us. War is terrible but inevitable if you want to survive as a nation.
146
posted on
12/08/2002 10:21:35 AM PST
by
FITZ
To: FITZ
You are completely wrong that "nobody" on this thread wants to kill babies. This is precisely what Catchelot endorses who wants to turn million of Muslim babies (or "roaches") into dust.
I completely agree that there is always collatoral killing in a just war. Such killings are unavoidable. This is not the issue here, however.
There is a world of difference between unintended collatoral killings of innocents and an intended policy advocated by many on this *thread of "nuking" Muslims on a mass and indiscriminate scale. Such a nuking policy, of course, would turn millions of babies into dust.
To: Aliska
Sorry...my response was intended for someone else.
To: Austin Willard Wright
This is precisely what Catchelot endorses who wants to turn million of Muslim babies (or "roaches") into dust. Mmmmm? Didn't have the guts to ping me to your little snivel-fest, huh?
Of course we don't want to nuke babies. Feel free to go and sort any and all babies out before the nuking starts :). However, it would be good if you would drag your infested and no doubt infectious carcass to ground zero at zero hour.
Still, I have no doubt that it won't be necessary to nuke all that many of them. Most will see the writing on the wall and correct their erronous ways. You don't understand any of this, of course, being one of the nonsentients drooling at both ends whenever he sees a bomb belt. Go eat a blasting cap.
To: areafiftyone
quote ""God is sure to win.""
Well he got that part right...:)
150
posted on
12/08/2002 11:22:25 AM PST
by
Lucas1
To: Cachelot
You seem to be moderating somewhat. You would at least now allow us anti-baby killers a chance to "sort out any and all babies before the nuking starts." I always knew you were a softie at heart!
All the Best,
AWWW
To: marshmallow
Another murderous, barking, spittle-frothing madman, who hides his hatred and blood-lust
behind a religious facade.
Facade? I don't think so.
This fellow is just being obedient to what is in the Koran.
And is carrying forward their (approx.) 1300-year war to take over the planet.
It's the peaceful Muslims in those rare places like Turkey that have a
"facade" of Islam.
Think this sounds like paranoia? Check out the history of the Coptic Christians
in Egypt and inquire as to why the Middle East is now almost totally devoid of Christians.
152
posted on
12/08/2002 11:35:00 AM PST
by
VOA
To: Austin Willard Wright
I always knew you were a softie at heart! Course I am :). Consider yourself the lucky recipient of a hotfoot, a wedgie, and a ripped left nostril. All virtual, of course.
To: Austin Willard Wright
You are a freak and your response's have turned childish. You do not warrant further discussion.
Go play in traffic.
To: Cachelot
Ouch! You sure know how to hurt a guy.
To: JoeSixPack1
I love too Joe.
To: Austin Willard Wright
Have a nice day. :-)
To: Austin Willard Wright
Austin, you ask whether or not I can understand differences. Yes, I can, thank you very much.
158
posted on
12/09/2002 3:51:29 PM PST
by
abclily
To: abclily
Good for you. Unfortunately, not everyone here does. Cheers, AWW
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-159 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson