Skip to comments.
Bush Signs Terrorism Insurance Act, Sees Jobs Boost
Reuters ^
| Tuesday, November 26, 2002
| Randall Mikkelsen
Posted on 11/26/2002 10:58:55 AM PST by Willie Green
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
The title of this article should read: "Bush Helps Insurance Industry Sodomize The Treasury"
With the collapse of the high-tech telecom/dotbomb bubble, and the economy in general in the dumpster, there is a glut of empty office space on the market. There is absolutely NO pent-up demand for new construction of 110 story office buildings.
Who does this out-of-touch Presidential Bozo think he's kidding?
Related thread: Bush Plans New Agency to Dole Out Billions in Aid
To: Willie Green
As they say in Texas, all hat and no cattle. The appearance is created that this is holding back construction when the real reason is the glut of office space that is already built.
2
posted on
11/26/2002 11:11:44 AM PST
by
meenie
To: Willie Green
"read: "Bush Helps Insurance Industry Sodomize The Treasury"" Is there nothing more vile than those greedy, corporate insurance bastards?!! Oh!!..and those homophobes that won't let a gay man take children camping. The swine!! And christians..Yikes!!!
Sure is fun being part of the herd.
3
posted on
11/26/2002 11:41:13 AM PST
by
laotzu
To: laotzu
sorry lao, this legislation was not needed at this time. the concept as well as the "why" is bogus. if construction is slow it's because there is NO demand. there's plenty of empty office space, hotel rooms, and yes even in NYC multimillion dollar condos are going a beggin. we've got to take a breather for awhile and allow for industry adjustments.
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: contessa machiaveli
" if construction is slow it's because there is NO demand" This is not about construction or the need for office space.
This is about guaranteeing insurance companies they will not have liabilities forced upon them from risks they did not accept, or collect premiums for.
To arbitrarily, & forcibly transfer risks on them; and prohibit all underwriting and compensation, would financially destroy them in short order.
As despicable as insurance companies are painted (and sometimes earned), we would not be able to do without them.
6
posted on
11/26/2002 12:30:25 PM PST
by
laotzu
To: laotzu
This is about guaranteeing insurance companies they will not have liabilities forced upon them from risks they did not accept, or collect premiums for. There's no need for such subsidies.
Insurance companies are in the business of evaluating and underwriting such risks.
To: laotzu
This is not about construction or the need for office space. That's not what the president has been saying.
8
posted on
11/26/2002 1:04:10 PM PST
by
Moonman62
To: Willie Green
Bush said on Tuesday that more than $15 billion in real estate transactions were delayed by an inability to obtain terrorism insurance following the 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon. Does anyone know of any actual project that's been held up?
9
posted on
11/26/2002 1:05:21 PM PST
by
Moonman62
To: Willie Green
"Today we're taking action to strengthen America's economy, to build confidence with America's investors and to create jobs for America's workers," Bush said at a White House signing ceremony. If he really wanted to help investors and create jobs, he'd stop the runaway federal pork train, and get the government out of the way. Adding another $270 billion potential liabilty to us taxpayers isn't helping.
To: Moonman62
Of course not.
This whole sham is so ludicrous, it's even insufficient to say that their motives are "transparent"
It's more an arrogant display of "Look what we can get away with" basking in the spotlight.
To: jbind
New Republican Motto: "We're not very good for the economy, but we're not as bad as the Democrats."
To: Willie Green
$100 billion in U.S. government backing for insurance companies........
Quid Pro Quo?
I suppose insurance premiums will be plunging now right?
13
posted on
11/26/2002 1:18:37 PM PST
by
WhiteGuy
To: Willie Green
I just had another thought....
Doesn't this "plan" seem like one of Tony Soprano's cause and effect scams?
Frightening
14
posted on
11/26/2002 1:22:59 PM PST
by
WhiteGuy
To: WhiteGuy
FrighteningEven Hollyweird scriptwriters can't top the corruption that occurs in real life.
To: Willie Green
I own a ONE STORY office/warehouse building in a premiere business park and my "updated" insurance policy excludes "terrorism" AND THE PREMIUM DOUBLED.
You probably ought to research the problem from a business perspective, before posting.
16
posted on
11/26/2002 6:25:55 PM PST
by
demsux
To: Moonman62
Does anyone know of any actual project that's been held up?Yes
17
posted on
11/26/2002 6:28:07 PM PST
by
demsux
To: demsux
I own a ONE STORY office/warehouse building in a premiere business park Whooooaa... I'm sure that just gotta be on the Top Ten Target List for the Evil Doers. </sarcasm>
To: demsux
What project is that?
To: Moonman62
World Trade Center
20
posted on
11/26/2002 7:59:59 PM PST
by
demsux
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson