Skip to comments.
Great Gray Lady in spat with saloon hussy (New York Times vs. Fox News) Ann Coulter
worldnetdaily ^
| 11/20/2002
| Ann Coulter
Posted on 11/20/2002 3:51:15 PM PST by TLBSHOW
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: Pokey78
BUMP, and thanks for the ping.
To: Solamente
To: coteblanche
Ann Coulter PING!Notify me if you'd like to be removed from my Ann Coulter Ping List...even though you are the only one on this list.
23
posted on
11/20/2002 4:35:06 PM PST
by
jla
To: TLBSHOW
FOUR HOUR PHONE CALL?????????????????????
geez that woman is psycho
24
posted on
11/20/2002 4:35:44 PM PST
by
Mr. K
To: Tempest
Not to worry, that the liberal-leftists may trot out a brilliant and attractive spokesperson for their side. If capable of intelligent discourse, not attractive; if attractive, dumber than a box of rocks. Here is their dilemma - Beautiful people are ornaments, and therefore to be kept away from brutal and bruising engagements, that may in any way damage their serene advocacy of unearned esteem, and the warrior types must be kept with their fighting edge keenly honed, leaving no time for personal vanities. But alas, all the warqueens have aged, and become viragos, and the idealized beauties are often as not, of simply confused sexuality, mere shadows of real people lacking altogether of any substance.
To: Mr. K
FOUR HOUR PHONE CALL????????????????????? geez that woman is psycho
Wonder how many times Gephardt said "Yes, Barbara, you're right, Barbara. I agree. "
26
posted on
11/20/2002 4:38:59 PM PST
by
copycat
To: Dog Gone
27
posted on
11/20/2002 4:40:39 PM PST
by
laurav
To: Solamente
HEY! Where's the obligatory photos?
To: TLBSHOW
Hmm... just read the Times piece. It's a by-lined op-ed. Just like Anne's. It's not the official position of the newspaper.
29
posted on
11/20/2002 4:44:00 PM PST
by
laurav
To: TLBSHOW
...though admittedly, I have not consulted the "living Constitution" in the past 24 hours to see if a new penumbra specifically about...Fantastic quote!
30
posted on
11/20/2002 4:46:45 PM PST
by
Hunble
To: laurav
That's it! Thank you!
And Ann was actually more kind to this article than it deserved. While she focused on the hypocrisy which was inherent, and the inadvertant admission of a lack of patriotism, she didn't really point out that this was a broadside at Fox on a great many fronts.
31
posted on
11/20/2002 4:48:44 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: TLBSHOW
Nor was there much neutrality shown between George Bush and the Nobel Peace Prize Committee. After the Norwegians who gave us the term "quisling" awarded former President Jimmy Carter the Peace Prize citing his vocal opposition to President Bush's war policies, the press sprang to action. The whole chorus began calling this comically inept president one of America's "greatest." Good Morning America's Charles Gibson said Carter had "become, in the opinion of many, the greatest ex-president of modern times." MSNBC's Brian Williams who worked for Carter asked a history professor if it was fair to call Carter "the best former president in, at minimum, modern American history, and perhaps, well, I guess, the last 200 years?" (Absolutely, historian Marshall Frady replied.) On the "Today" show, Katie Couric said: "I mean, it's so wonderful ... and so well-deserved."...
So it's interesting that the Times viewed Ailes' letter as an affront to objective journalism.
None of these people work for the NY Times. I don't understand why she's citing them as evidence that the NY Times has not been neutral in the war. I don't think they have, but couldn't she have cited examples from the Times? Ann owes it to readers not to be lazy in reporting.
32
posted on
11/20/2002 4:49:01 PM PST
by
laurav
Comment #33 Removed by Moderator
To: coteblanche
Coulter bump
Comment #35 Removed by Moderator
To: laurav
I new it was somewhere! LoL
Thanks for putting the link here!
36
posted on
11/20/2002 5:32:39 PM PST
by
TLBSHOW
To: Solamente
37
posted on
11/20/2002 5:36:28 PM PST
by
TLBSHOW
Comment #38 Removed by Moderator
To: TLBSHOW
It occurs to me the Gray Lady is scandalized by the brains behind FOX NEWS having expressed a verboten opinion to the President of the United States. Now if Roger Ailes had sent a memo criticizing the President, as night follows day, the New York Times would be singing him hosannas. Roger's unforgivable offense was to be a proud American. The clymers of our media find that to be unbearable. Ann's written another knock-out-of-the-ballpark article and the best thing Mullah Howell Raines and his staff could do is do a Baldwin or Harrelson and move to London. No one will miss one bit their faux patriotism and contempt for our great country and the wonderful people in it, especially people like Roger who've sent the liberal media reeling. No wonder the Great Gray Lady is ranting hysterically about a memo scandal that not only doesn't reflect anything unfavorable on Roger's character, but to the contrary, which calls that of the establishment's press's objectivity into question. Ann just showed up the NYT to the world for what it truly is.
To: jwalsh07
"
Annie got her gun again. Bang!"
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson