[The Raven]

I think it is time to go on the offensive with the following as a minimum:

NY Times Dowd Daschle

[Iowegian]

She didn't have time to write her own column so she turned in Terry M's fax.

[Rome2000]

I'm still waiting for someone to give me a good reason why anybody should care what some leftist whore who slept her way into her job with the "Slimes" writes.

Her pathetic stunted screeds are amateurish drivel.

I rather read a post from A+Bert.

[republicman]

As always liberals have it backward. Clinton, the wreckless teenager threw a big party in has 8 years. And now the grownups (Bush and co) have come home to clean it up.

[kcar]

The liberal ploy of painting Bush as dumb or as a boy just helps Dubya maintain the upper hand. How many chess games do the rats need to lose before they credit their opponent with being clever? And the "immaturity" charge is just one of those self-promoting and nonspecific insults that's used by intellectual cowards - it suggests that she can see that the President is arrested at some level below which she has successfully acceeded.
That's a subjective perspective and subject to partisan interpretation. The contrary claim that the public is happy that the grown-ups were in charge when 9-11 occurred - not the Clinton kids - can just as easily be made.

[oline]

Geez -- she has no idea how boring and predictable her writing is, does she?

[fire_eye]

Now, you guys are all steamed because she's attacking Bush, but I just can't get over how **lame** her so-called "Prose" is. She (and Ivins and... well, you can make the same list I can) are so irrationally infuriated over the "Loss" (theirs, not the country's) of the White House that they can't even form a coherent thought, or sentence.

Believe it or not, the Humanities types at the Spew Yuck Times *know* that. They may not know what to do about her or how to "Break The News" to her, much less how to get *rid* of her, but they *know* lousy, incoherent writing when they see it, and they *are* embarrassed by it.

And we can take advantage of that, if anyone's got time... Don't even *bother* attacking her politics - just attack her basic lack of self-control and the destructive effect it has on her (nearly nonexistent to begin with) "Literary Skills".

The Humanities majors down there at the Alzheimer Lady don't have much left to which to cling, having lost all their credibility when they abandoned their objectivity (and they know that too), but they can still point to their (imagined) "Skill at the Writer's Craft". No-Brain Maureen's pathetic scribblings call even *that* into question - and they know it... they *KNOW* it. They *cringe* every time one of her columns lands in their inbox, and they don't know how to deal with it.

so let them know that YOU know how bad she makes them looks...

and that you're going to point out to the rest of the "Literary World" how bad she makes them look...

Threaten what's left of their pathetic shreds of self-esteem... you just might succeed in driving *them* over the edge along with Boreen...

[flamefront]

Boy emperor?

Too bad she missed her history lessons - Alexander was in his early 20's when he formed an empire. G.W. Bush is 56.

[Corporate Law]

Please, someone, get this woman laid!!!!

After reading this, I figure, with say about 100 less IQ points, I too can be an NYT columnist (/sarcasm).