Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former NAACP leader carries Confederate flag across Upstate on March Across Dixie
Greenville Online ^ | 10/19/02 | By John Boyanoski

Posted on 10/19/2002 3:41:11 AM PDT by shuckmaster

Edited on 05/07/2004 9:05:57 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-448 next last
To: WhiskeyPapa
People like stand waite do tend to give lie to the 'heritage not hate' line, don't they?
21 posted on 10/19/2002 7:19:15 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster
Edgerton, 55, said he marches to let people remember the people -- blacks and whites alike -- who died under the Confederate flag.

I don't know Mr. Edgerton or his agenda, but I have never seen the name of a single black who was killed "under the Confederate flag."

Maybe some of the FR lost cause brigade can provide the name of one, but they won't provide many, because it just didn't happen.

Walt

22 posted on 10/19/2002 7:20:21 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Yeah, as long as you don't count that whole federal draft thing.
23 posted on 10/19/2002 7:21:20 AM PDT by Stavka2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
People like stand waite do tend to give lie to the 'heritage not hate' line, don't they?

Well, yeah.

But on the other hand he gives substance to phrases like, "a bit short of a load", "not playing with a full deck", "his elevator doesn't go all the way to the top", "hasn't quite got a six pack", and so forth.

He'll doubtless be along to prove it before long.

Free Dixie cups now!

Walt

24 posted on 10/19/2002 7:24:17 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster

25 posted on 10/19/2002 7:26:49 AM PDT by Reagan is King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stavka2
Yeah, as long as you don't count that whole federal draft thing.

Stavka!

How's Czar Nicky doing?

The so-called CSA not only went to a draft a year before the Union, they also conscripted up to 1/3 of their army. The Union only used about 6% draftees.

More importantly, at a time when the Union soldiers were re-enlisting in large numbers, the soldiers of the so-called CSA were beginning to desert in large numbers.

"A new England private said that each evening the men in the company would speculate about the number of deserters who would come in that night: "The boys talk about the Johnnies as at home we talk about suckers and eels. The boys will look around in the evening and guess that there will be a good run of Johnnies." Heavy firing on the picket line was always taken to mean that the enemy wsa trying to keep deserters from getting away."

"A Stillness at Apotmattox" pp 330-31, by Bruce Catton

Walt

26 posted on 10/19/2002 7:28:42 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Stavka2
The south instituted conscription a over a year before the North and draftees made up between 25% and 30% of the confederate army. At the same time they passed the conscription bill in April 1862, they passed legislation extending every current soldier's enlistment until the end of the war. Southern soldiers, like their Union counterparts, originally enlisted for a set period depending on how their state chose to raise their particular regiment. Davis changed all that. So from that standpoint you can hardly consider the confederate army a bunch of militias on loan to Richmond, can you? Richmond had more control over them than the states did.
27 posted on 10/19/2002 7:28:48 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
often you southron types feel that the only way to uphold your heritage is to lie about mine

How does this story in any way "lie" about your heritage?

As far as Walt is concerned, Ive seen him jump in on any thread remotely concerning the South and spew venom for no reason except to pick a fight.

Ive also seen Walt get his clock cleaned in fights he started, which is hilarious.

28 posted on 10/19/2002 7:31:17 AM PDT by Moosefart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Moosefart
This particular story has streached the truth about one or two things on the southron side but hasn't directly attacked the North. I'm not attacking Mr. Edgerton, just pointing out some errors.
29 posted on 10/19/2002 7:36:25 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Moosefart
As far as Walt is concerned, Ive seen him jump in on any thread remotely concerning the South and spew venom for no reason except to pick a fight.

Awwwww........

No, if you go back to my, okay, second post in this thread, you'll see that I excerpted something from the article that wasn't true. There is little evidence in the record of black CSA soldiers. Hold the BS, and you'll see me no more.

Shuckmeister started this thread, even though -- if he's at all rational -- he knows the article is riven with falsehood. I didn't start it and I seldom post articles. But I am always willing to meet the CSA lost brigade's BS head on.

Walt

30 posted on 10/19/2002 7:46:03 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Re State Militias:
Not true that both north and south were militia on loan to central governments.

The southern confederacy was just that - Texas troops fought as Texas troops etc. The north drew locally but was far more centralilzed in all other regards.
The southern states largely maintained control over who commanded the individual units, how they were armed, and what kind of training they had...piecemeal.

I believe the states could recall their forces at any time and I believe that many state troops enlisted in "the Confederate Army" only after completing their state enlistment.

"States Rights" is not just some cracker excuse for not going along with Washington's whims - it was in the core of Confederation and had been the original intent in the American revolution. It took ten years for the US to morph from confederation to union and that change, including the ability of the federal government to tax and redistribute those revenues, was one of the causes of the war between North and South.

(As best I can tell, I had a very early relative - not in the south - who was so unhappy with that change that he picked up and returned to England.)

It's possible to say that the South lost because of adherence to the original tenants of America's revolution.
It's also true to say that the original big state/small state, industrial/agrarian split (that gave us a senate and a house of representatives) was only decided in the war between the small(area)/dense(population)/industrial northern faction and the large(area)/thinly populated/agrarian south. The north had people, tax dollars, and armories, the south had land, revenue from sales of crops more than goods, and relied on import or local small manufacture.

As to black troops and service workers in the southern forces:
Remember that slave could earn freedom, many had done so before 1862 and many were emancipated during the fight. Either serving someone in the army or serving as a member or in support of the army was probably a means to free status long before Lincoln's effort to start a slave revolt.

Furthermore; some of our commentators might take note that it was only 1947 when blacks in the US military were allowed into non-service units and given access to rank and honors. (The guy in the Pearl Harbor story was a steward and several medals were NOT awarded because of race during WW2 and as late as Korea.
31 posted on 10/19/2002 7:48:02 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
"if you don't mind. And even if you do."

Fair enough,
So long as you recognize that, as a conservative who has only lived briefly in the south and only visits there today, I consider the modern liberal's trinity of Lincoln, FDR, and Kennedy to have done more deconstruct what America was meant to be than any others in our history.

And, I consider the mythology that was built around each of them to have become so entrenched in our schools, media, and political process as to have created the Carters and Clintons that continue to torment us today.

I don't for an instant doubt the integrety or honor of the individual soldier or most of their commanders.

(And, I don't intend to make this an ongoing debate.)

32 posted on 10/19/2002 7:58:42 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: norton; Moosefart
Remember that slave could earn freedom, many had done so before 1862 and many were emancipated during the fight.

You won't show that by appeal to the record.

Meanwhile, the Alabama constitution of 1861 FORBADE the freeing of ANY slaves, and that sentiment was common in the so-called CSA.

"The main excitant impulse was fear, and they wanted to protect the institution, not to penalize the individual. It was because the free Negro menaced the institution, because manumission undermined it, because all self-help systems for the slave corroded It, that pro- slavery men urged new legislation. Their object was not to surround slavery with an atmosphere of terror. It was to shore up an institution built on quick- sand and battered bv all the forces of world sentiment and emergent industrialism.

Ruffin was personally the kindliest of masters. The unhappy fact was that it had become impossible to safeguard slavery without brutal violence to countless individuals; either the institution had to be given up, or the brutality committed.

The legislators of Louisiana and Arkansas, of Alabama and Georgia, with humane men like Ruffin and the Eastern Shore planters of Maryland, had faced this alternative. They had chosen the institution. The Richmond Examiner stated their choice in unflinching language:

It is all an hallucination to suppose that we are ever going to get rid of slavery, or that it will ever be desirable to do so. It is a thing that we cannot do without;that is righteous, profitable, and permanent, and that belongs to Southern society as inherently, intrinsically, and durably as the white race itself. Southern men should act as if the canopy of heaven were inscribed with a covenant, in letters of fire, >that the negro is here, and here forever—is our property, and ours forever—is never to be emancipated—is to be kept hard at work and in rigid subjection all his days.

This has the ring of the Richmond publiisher Fitzhugh, and would have been repudiated by many Southerners. But Jefferson Davis said, July 6, 1859, "There is not probably an intelligent mind among our own citizens who doubts either the moral or the legal right of the institution of African slavery." Senator A. G. Brown said September 4, 1858, that he wanted Cuban, Mexican, and Central American territory for slavery; "I would spread the blessings of slavery . . . to the uttermost ends of the earth."

Such utterances treated slavery as permanent, and assumed that it must be defended at every point."

-- The Emergence of Lincoln vol II, by Allen Nevins

See Moosefart. Ignorance and misinformation abounds.

Don't you want the straight scoop?

Walt

33 posted on 10/19/2002 8:01:01 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: norton
The guy in the Pearl Harbor story was a steward and several medals were NOT awarded because of race during WW2 and as late as Korea.

As late as Korea, and Vietnam. And of those that were deservedly awarded, there are some stories both tragic and disgusting that go with them. That of Dwight Johnson from B company of the Forth Infantry Division's 1/69th Armor comes to mind.

Anyone know if there were any black recipients of the Southern Cross of honour, the Confederacy's MOH equivalent? I would expect not, but certainly couldn't back that SWAG up.

-archy-/-

34 posted on 10/19/2002 8:23:19 AM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyPapa
Walt, Walt...c'mon guy, you know you love to argue and insult Southerners at any opportunity, be honest with yourself at least.

Im not well versed in civil war history and I don't claim to be. I love the South because I was born there. If someone chooses to be proud of their heritage, what's that to you?

I noticed you last Christmas when you posted some of your trademarked Southern hatred on Christ's birthday. It spoke volumes of your mentality, you're not interested in exposing CSA lies only in rabble-rousing. Its a free country...knock yourself out, just be honest about it.

35 posted on 10/19/2002 8:25:35 AM PDT by Moosefart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyPapa
Some excerpts form a pamphlet he had published

Interestingly enough most of these pamphlets and books quoted were published in New York City. What Walt? Was there a conspiracy of Southern men who mysteriously took over northern publishing houses to produce this Southern propaganda? And they did it under the nose of all these abolitionists that you claim were fighting for the good cause. Oh wait the Abolitionist Party made up less than 1% of the northern population.

You know for your theories to truly work, about 60,000 people have to disappear, half of lincoln's quotes are made up, and the other half you can't apparently take at face value without running through our handydandy Walt translator. If that's not revisionist I don't know what is

March on HK and Godspeed

36 posted on 10/19/2002 8:32:00 AM PDT by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957; THUNDER ROAD; Beach_Babe; TexConfederate1861; TomServo; LibKill; ...
DAY 5 WITH H.K. EDGERTON IN SOUTH CAROLINA -

The day started at 6:30AM at the John C. Calhoun Monument 3miles South of Easley,S.C. with Jay Salley, Scott Goldsmith, Larry Oberstar,H.K., Terry Lee and myself walking and Julie and Betty Scott in their car as escorts as it was still dark. We proceeded 1 mile and met Tony Goodnough who walked with us the nest 1/2 mile to hwy.178. He left us there as his job beckoned. We turned north onto hwy.178 in order to march past school in center of Liberty. This took us approximately 3miles off our course and an hour plus added to time. However, we did get some attention.We resumed our march westward on hwy. 123, walking through wet grass that was almost waist high in places and a minimum of knee high. This slowed our progress somewhat but still maintained a good pace. Somewhere near the hwy.18 exit we were joined by Dixie Horkie and daughter Amanda and son Jason, (I think).We stopped again when passing clemson's city limits to take pictures at the other Calhoun marker. We encounterd some very nice folks at this brief stop.

Then on to clemson. That was a different story. Not many nice people there,but some. After turning off 123 onto 93 to pass by the university we began to get some very hateful and bewildered looks. All marchers were cordial. After marching past the university and through town and within sight of 123 where we would again proceed west we were ( accosted) my term, by the clemson captain of police. We were told at this late juncture that we must obtain a parade permit. After much talk and phone calls to Mr.Lyons and pictures by Pickens Sentinel Paper and all marchers except H.K. furled their flags, we were allowed to continue with the captain escorting H,K. to the clemson city limit sign about 3000 feet west on 123. Now this sounds bad but it isn't all. After marching into Oconee county and terminating our walk at 22 miles, we were informed that a parade permit must be obtained at a cost of $300.00. Well, that ain't going to happen. We will march to seneca city limits sign and all marchers except H.K. and one other without flag will continue through to opposite city limit sign. Then on toward Westminister, S.C. after being rejoined by marchers. More tomorrow if I get up.
R.L.Owings

37 posted on 10/19/2002 8:39:37 AM PDT by shuckmaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyPapa
For some reason this is the mental picture I have of you living in Tennessee with your mindset...LOL


38 posted on 10/19/2002 8:53:30 AM PDT by Moosefart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.

39 posted on 10/19/2002 9:01:49 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster
Bump for colorblind loyalty to the ideals of Dixie.
40 posted on 10/19/2002 9:04:11 AM PDT by PresbyRev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-448 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson