Skip to comments.
Queen Shelia embarrasses Houston again(My Title)
Houston Chronicle ^
| Oct. 15, 2002
| SHELY HODGE
Posted on 10/16/2002 7:31:20 AM PDT by bradactor
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
To: SkyPilot
I had not heard that particular story! The pilot dropped her purse out the window - that is really funny.
Didn't that airline ban her from any further flights?
To: Mr. K
How can the black districts possibly elect people so stupid and think you are moving forward in life? One-word answer: reactionism.
42
posted on
10/16/2002 8:47:30 AM PDT
by
IronJack
To: Mr. K
Because the folks that elect Lee are not literate enough to read of were already dead when their vote was cast!!!!
43
posted on
10/16/2002 8:51:43 AM PDT
by
Lewite
To: Jubal Harshaw
The monarchy of Thailand has very little power under the Thai Constitution, so your comment is ridiculous, at best.
44
posted on
10/16/2002 8:51:59 AM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: SkyPilot
This was the same incident when she screamed at the unfortunately steward, "Don't you know who I am? Don't you know who I am? I AM THE QUEEN." Widely reported in Houston and nationally, and yet they voted for her again. Maybe this is why she didn't know how to conduct herself at the event with the Queen of Thailand: Sheila still thinks she's the queen. She is thoroughly "luda-krous."
45
posted on
10/16/2002 8:53:32 AM PDT
by
3AngelaD
To: Jubal Harshaw
To this American, the idea that some people are simply born rule the rest is an abomination far worse than anything Ms. Lee has espoused. To this American, the idea that a complete buffoon such as Ms. Lee can be ELECTED, simply out of anti-white reactionism, is an abomination far worse than anything Asian royalty has committed.
46
posted on
10/16/2002 8:54:25 AM PDT
by
IronJack
To: Mr. K
Our fine Mayor is not much better in the proper use of grammar department. His speeches are written by others and he still slaughters them. Birds of a feather and all that.
47
posted on
10/16/2002 8:59:40 AM PDT
by
Jaded
To: Dog Gone
The monarchy of Thailand has very little power under the Thai Constitution, so your comment is ridiculous, at best. On the contrary, the monarch of Thailand is the final arbiter of who is allowed to run the government. This was made obvious in 1992, when an army general, Suchinda Krapayoon, who was then the prime minister, set the Army on protesters. Opposition political figures were pulled from thier houses and detained, people were machine-gunned in the streets, buildings were set ablaze in Bangkok.
Parliment did not stop this. Local authorities did not stop this. NGOs did not stop this.
The KING asserted control, removed Krapayoon from power, replaced him as PM, and outlined the action to be taken against other officers of the Army and government who had participated.
The point? The royalty of Thailand has more power than it may seem on paper. In my example, the king used that power for good, but the bottom line is that the power to replace the government is his, unquestioned by most Thais. Thailand is NOT England.
To: SkyPilot
They found her purse under her seat, which Sheila Lee demanded be returned to her right away! So, the co-pilot opened his side window, and dropped it on the tarmac. She's lucky they couldn't drop it on the tarmac from 5000 feet.
49
posted on
10/16/2002 9:02:43 AM PDT
by
steve-b
To: bradactor
wouldn't expect anything else from her
To: bradactor
Actually, I think we should sentence her to permanent latrine cleaning duty at the Thai embassy.
What hideous arrogance.
She has no idea the esteem the people of Thailand hold their King AND Queen in.
And Sheila is not even poor white trash as an excuse, is she. Sigh.
51
posted on
10/16/2002 9:30:03 AM PDT
by
Quix
To: Jubal Harshaw
The ability of the King to intervene in that crisis came more from the respect that the monarchy enjoys in that country than from any constitutional power, correct?
In that sense, the monarchy has the same legitimacy as any elected official.
52
posted on
10/16/2002 9:30:45 AM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Zack Nguyen
I think you may be forgetting the lovely Maxine Waters.
To: bradactor; Hap; Xenalyte
What really amazes me is the fact that she only needed one seat. Wouldn't she need at least three extra seats on each side to accommodate her ego?
To: SkyPilot
To: Jubal Harshaw
Queen Sirikit, on the other hand, rules her nation simply by virtue of birth and marriage to the King. Like the British the King in Thailand is totally symbolic and does not rule. They have a parliment, or sometimes a General. This still rubs a little I suppose, but then to insist that every nation end every trace of their historical political system simply to fit the modern model does not seem a conservative position either.
To: bradactor
Who is this trailer park queen Shelia Jackson Lee ?
Did she fart and belch after eating?(Chinese custom)
Or is that a Russian custom, no matter
Maybe she did'nt stay to eat, the photo op was the thing anyway.. Not to be outdone by the Baghdad 3 eh!...
57
posted on
10/16/2002 10:32:51 AM PDT
by
hosepipe
To: Mr. K
I saw her on O'Reilly the other day- she is can barely form a grammatically correct sentence.Her fluency in English came with her degree from Yale Law School. No kidding. Think she earned it? Surely they wouldn't just give a law degree to a black liberal, would they?
To: Dog Gone
Good point. As best I can tell, the majority of Thais LOVE the king and queen, and it is that love and respect that give the royals their power. However, unlike elected officials, the king (and to a lesser extent, the queen)
(1)did not have to compete with others for their special place in the Thai government
(2)the king and queen benefit from birth, not from their own efforts, from a pervasive governent-run mechanism that exists to make them look good and to encourage love and loyalty to the royalty
(3)are protected from critisism by the Thai constitution
These factors are inconsistent with freedom, particularly the freedom to choose one's own leaders. As I hold this truth to be self-evident, that all men are created eaqual, the existence of Thai royalty, or any royalty, is an abomination to me. I may not like Ms. Lee (and I don't), but she rose to her position through her own efforts, and in the face of electoral opposition. Therefore, she outranks all royalty in my book.
To: Xenalyte
Knew a dunb girl once who would say that. "Let me be a little more pacific."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson