Posted on 10/08/2002 12:36:29 PM PDT by Junior
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/764633/posts?q=1&&page=1
. . . which outlines a number of things about such aspects of space and ET's etc. based on the solid video and other recorded evidence of AT LEAST
high ranking and other ranks of government and industry personnel committed to testifying before congress if immunity can be granted.
I'd SURE APPRECIATE BEING ABLE TO DIALOGUE SERIOUSLY with any fair minded persons about such. Given my relative working at such a site, I no longer have the luxury of disbelief.
I had assumed it was just due to the depressed lunar real estate market. Either that, or we really did discover who the occupants of these lunar condos were, and ultimately decided we didn't want to move into that kind of neighborhood.
That's it - I'm going out and kicking Buzz Aldrin's lying *ss, and I don't care if he's 70-something. Who's with me?
Well...it may explain why my neck hurts.
People hereon mention the sheeple. They even discuss the censorship of the media. Some even admit the religion of science and the blind narrowness thereof. Yet they feel to see handwriting on the wall when the walls are as big as canyons and the writing as big as tall buildings--figurtively speaking.
Thanks for this post. I have expected such a level of disclosure to be visited upon the public step by step for decades. It's interesting that it has reached this point--it rather seems like a confirmation of my own expectations as well as the assertions made in the documents in post #46 mentioned above and found at:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/764633/posts?q=1&&page=1
I wonder what the scoffers will put in their mouths when they are no longer allowed the luxury of rationally scoffing. Or what they will use to recover their lower lips from the side walks and floors. As the Bible says of our era, truly men's hearts will fail them for fear.
Thankfully, that fear is not the only option.
But people COULD at least start from a more open, fair-minded perspective to honestly examine fairly the best of the evidence.
The 400+ high and other ranks of witnesses who have ALREADY GONE ON VIDEO RECORD AND OTHER RECORD is not to be sneezed at. People have said when such evidence was brought forward, THEN they would believe. Well, it's been and is being brought forward. Still shrill people scream about tin foil hats.
Some people prefer the shallow, transitory, cheap bliss of ignorance. It will crash far too soon. Then what?
Yes, and he's a crafty old buzzard, too. That's why my plan is to sneak up behind him with something heavy. Oh, I may be half his age, but that old man is going down....
Besides, when one is dealing with such evidence on the one hand and such blanket incredulity on the other, it's easily prone to fray one's edges.
Let me say this about Hoagland:
I applaud his efforts to re-ignite interest in space exploration. His chosen method is unusual, appealing to speculation, roads paved with gold, 72 virgin grapes and all that archaic nonsense. However, when he announced he would be getting a mission together within the year to send a camera to the moon to photograph the domes and glass skyscrapers and then failed to do so [this was several years ago,] it became obvious that others would have to do the actual space work. He is a journalist and is familiar with research in the archives; he is not inclined to do theoretical science nor work in the lab.
So, I applaud his PR work. It has stimulated a level of interest. However, Congress won't approve a mission to Mars to check out the Face, nor a mission to the moon to check out a glass skyscraper. Congress has reasons for doing things, but exploration and science are not among them.
His wife watches his back. You DON'T want to get her attention.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/764633/posts?q=1&&page=1
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.