Emails/faxes/phone calls to the Whitehouse are critical now.
We need to urge the President to support CR.
Remember our Retired Disabled Vets
Posted on 10/05/2002 8:17:14 PM PDT by Militiaman7
Time is short, the conference committee meets Tuesday morning.
Thanks,
Militiaman7
BUMP this to the top so all can read.
Vetscor Salute!
Emails/faxes/phone calls to the Whitehouse are critical now.
We need to urge the President to support CR.
Toward FREEDOM
Can anyone answer to why the Bush administration is OPPOSED to this getting rid of this insance injustice to our diabled vets?
For more info go to crlegislation.com and Uniformed Services Disabled Retires
The following is a copy of the letter Rep. Michael Bilirakis sent to an Assistant Secretary of Defense as a rebuttal to ASD Abell's position on concurrent receipt. Rep. Bilirakis, the House champion of concurrent receipt is also sending President Bush a similar letter. We applaud and thank Rep. Bilirakis and Ms. Rebecca Hyder, his Legislative Assistant, for their hard work and unparalleled perseverance on behalf of the disabled military retired community.
October 1, 2002
The Honorable Charles Abell
Assistant Secretary of Defense (Force Management Policy)
Department of Defense
The Pentagon
Washington, D.C. 20301-1155
Dear Secretary Abell:
As you know, I am the chief proponent of the concurrent receipt issue in the House of Representatives. I saw an article by James Garamone on concurrent receipt posted on the American Forces Press Service. I was quite disappointed by some of the comments and arguments raised by you and the Department of Defense in the article.
According to the article, "DOD research shows that the small number veterans who would benefit from such a repeal are already doing well financially." Based on my contacts with disabled military retirees over the last 17 years, I question the validity of that statement. Since I first began working on this issue, I have heard from thousands of disabled retirees who are negatively impacted by the current offset and are struggling to get by each month. Some of these retirees have been forced to undertake drastic measures, such as selling their homes, in order to meet their monthly obligations. For many of them, their retired pay amounts to less than $1,000 per month. In many of these cases, the amount of the VA offset exceeds the retiree's total retired pay, meaning the individual receives none of the retired pay from the Department of Defense that they have rightfully earned. Even with their VA disability compensation, most of these individuals had total monthly incomes of $1,000 or less, and I seriously doubt that any of these retirees would consider themselves "doing well financially."
Moreover, the Department of Defense has already acknowledged that its studies on retiree income included very few severely disabled retirees. This omission undermines the credibility of the Department's studies. Furthermore, these studies relied on total household income, including spousal income and other outside income sources. Outside income sources have no bearing on whether or not a military retiree is entitled to receive his or her retired pay -- retirement income earned with 20 years or more of loyal service to our nation.
I also believe that your assertion that if concurrent receipt passes "1.2 million veterans could qualify" for extra payments is blatantly misleading. Previous cost estimates based on data provided by the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs show that about 550,000 disabled retirees would qualify if a full concurrent receipt plan were enacted into law. Undoubtedly a change in the current law will encourage additional members to apply for a disability rating. However, speculation that an additional 700,000 retirees might apply for and be granted disability ratings is simply overreaching. It is highly improbable that this many retirees would even apply, much less be approved, for VA disability compensation.
Finally, your argument that funding for concurrent receipt will hurt current servicemembers is also misleading. Members of Congress are cognizant of the sacrifices military service entails. Neither I nor any of my colleagues would suggest that other personnel funding be cut to pay for concurrent receipt, and the enactment of a concurrent receipt provision won't negatively impact military readiness. If there were any question that my legislation to eliminate the current offset between military retired pay and VA disability compensation would have such a negative impact, I sincerely doubt that it would have garnered the support of more than 90 percent of the House of Representatives and 80 percent of the Senate.
Moreover, earlier this year, I worked very hard with the members of the House Budget Committee to provide the funding needed to begin the elimination of the current offset so that readiness would not be negatively impacted by our actions. I take great offense at the insinuations that I or my fellow Members of Congress do not support the brave men and women currently serving in our Armed Forces.
Secretary Abell, I would remind you of a quote by our first Commander-in-Chief George Washington: "The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war, no matter how justified, shall be directly proportional to how they perceive the veterans of earlier wars were treated and appreciated by their nation." At a time when our Nation is calling upon our Armed Forces to defend democracy and freedom, we must be careful not to send the wrong signal to our military service members. For those of them who have selected to make their career in the U.S. military, they face an additional unknown risk in our fight against terrorism. If they are injured, they will be forced to forego their earned retired pay in order to receive their VA disability compensation. In effect, they will be paying for their own disability benefits from their retirement checks.
I strongly urge you and the Department of Defense to end your misleading rhetoric against concurrent receipt, do what is right, and support the elimination of the current offset.
Sincerely yours,
Michael Bilirakis
Member of Congress
EAGLES UP!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.