Skip to comments.
Lautenberg up 11 in new RAT poll!
Fox News
| 10/04/02
| Me
Posted on 10/04/2002 12:57:08 PM PDT by winin2000
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 last
To: Becki
Rush was saying today that Lautenberg was out for about 45 minutes today shaking hands. People were not receptive. In fact, they made many comments about how he was not legal, he should be ashamed, etc. For now, this is the only poll we need. I still advocate a set of "bait and switch" commercials with ordinary NJ voters reciting the phrase over and over.
81
posted on
10/04/2002 3:25:52 PM PDT
by
mwl1
To: Always Right
You can't link an oral report from the evening news. I heard it too!
82
posted on
10/04/2002 3:28:22 PM PDT
by
Alissa
To: ambrose
400 is a very small sample adn 4.9 % is huge swing to apply to both. Stat wise they might be tie according to this poll.
To: VRWC_minion
I just confirmed a rule of thumb to apply to the lead. A 4.9% margin of error yields a mrgin of error for the yield closer to 8.3% (4.9*1.7 factor)... This means that the sampling error could mean that the 11% lead is as low as 3% wihout considering nonsampling errors.
To: winin2000
The fix is in.
To: Catspaw
Obviously it was one of those poles stripers use (Democrap polls and exotic dancer poles are one in the same).
Get some Lysol!
Trajan88; TAMU Class of '88
86
posted on
10/04/2002 3:46:39 PM PDT
by
Trajan88
To: Russell Scott
This poll was conducted by mark Mellman a rat political consultant/pollster. A couple of points:
1) This poll could have been done before the Torch even resigned, that is the shennaigins in the NJSC wasn't weighted.
2) Could have been a push poll.
3) Tatically this poll could be a fraud designed to create media momentum for the Rat Lautenberg.
4) Forrester needs to go on the attack on lautenrat's record, his age, and the tie to the rat torch machine. Leave the litigation to others. If he has money start ads NOW, he is invisible starting last weekend the rat Senate CC has been running negative ads (vicious attack ads) against with no response from the pubbies.
I hear the pubbies have more money than the rats every election cycle, but I always see far more TV ads from rats every cycle (NY market).
87
posted on
10/04/2002 4:36:57 PM PDT
by
Leto
To: Bryan
@
88
posted on
10/04/2002 4:40:26 PM PDT
by
KQQL
To: winin2000
No one will believe this one....it's a poll by Mark Mellman, who works closely with Carville and Greenberg. Their specialty? Lies
89
posted on
10/04/2002 4:40:39 PM PDT
by
YaYa123
To: Russell Scott
FOXNews pointed out it was a democratic internal poll by Mark Mellman. No one seemed impressed, I think Fred Barnes had to stifle a laugh.
90
posted on
10/04/2002 4:42:47 PM PDT
by
YaYa123
To: winin2000
Demonrats can only get away with it, if we fall for it.........WE WILL WIN ONE FOR HONOR AND INTEGRITY
To: KQQL
Daschle 1 NRSC 0 Oh, spare me. A score only means something if both teams are on the same playing field. I haven't really been surprised by anything in this race yet.
92
posted on
10/05/2002 7:13:39 AM PDT
by
Coop
To: winin2000
Fight fire with fire. Replace Forrester with Giuliani !!
BUMP
93
posted on
10/05/2002 7:31:39 AM PDT
by
tm22721
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
A belated adsolutely!!!
The most recent polls were done over the weekend, where average working folk aren't home, and only the "have-nothing-better-to-do" trolls (i.e. RATS) and dead are available.
Have a nice day!!!
DD
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson