Skip to comments.
Another Sleazy Court - New Jersey’s supreme court goes to work.
National Review ^
| 10/3/02
| Mark R. Levin
Posted on 10/03/2002 11:21:24 AM PDT by wcdukenfield
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
To: wcdukenfield
Daschle became, Senate Majority Leader......All he thought he had to do was sit on every bill that the house sent to him........He even campaigned for Torricelli last week..........Daschle didn't plan adequately Toricelli's departure from NJ's Senatorial race.....Daschle was definitely asleep at the switch on this one........He(Daschle) should be embarrased to show his face on TV....But He'll hide his embarresment with a smirk.....Daschle......Definitely not leadership material!!!!
2
posted on
10/03/2002 11:25:37 AM PDT
by
Defender2
To: wcdukenfield
I heard somebody from Roll Call on the radio yesterday say two of the justices contributed to Torricelli's campaign.
3
posted on
10/03/2002 11:30:17 AM PDT
by
lasereye
To: wcdukenfield
The New Jersey Supreme Court has now taken on the power of rewriting the duly passed laws of my state - whether such laws are unconstitutional or not. It has usurped my state's democracy. The NJSC has become my state's dictator. I no longer live in a democracy in my state.
5
posted on
10/03/2002 11:30:49 AM PDT
by
Mo1
To: wcdukenfield
It's the New Jersey Soprano Court.
6
posted on
10/03/2002 11:30:59 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
To: wcdukenfield
They could at least have thrown in a couple of recipes to give their opinion more weight. LOL!
To: wcdukenfield
Well written. I just keep wondering how SCONJ justifies removing the name of an
elected representative who was chosen by the people, and replacing it with a
selected name from the Party machines.
Selected, not elected. Gee, that rings a bell, now, doesn't it?
To: yendu bwam
It has usurped my state's democracy. Exactly. The choice on the ballot was NOT the one elcted by the people of NJ. The voting public was never even given the chance to decide if they wanted Lautenberg to represent them on this ballot.
To: wcdukenfield; Defender2
Communist China has a constitution promising many of the freedoms we enjoy - in writing that is. Here is a real court case:
Man beaten up in KaraOKe lounge because he was annoying people with his terrible voice.Court Ruling: They listened to him sing and indeed, he was terrible. Ruling:
Assault was justified.We are quickly losing the rule of law and are now using liberal justification instead. It sickens. It destroys. The left celebrates chaos and destruction of our blessed country. (IMHO)
To: Libertina
So true, Libertina and so sad....
To: wcdukenfield
If the SCOTUS does not take up this case, it will be a tragedy.
12
posted on
10/03/2002 11:39:39 AM PDT
by
SkyPilot
To: Libertina
I believe that occured in Guam...but it was a hilarious story, nonetheless: supposedly when the guy was singing "My Way" a heckler yelled out " your way sucks!!"....
13
posted on
10/03/2002 11:40:59 AM PDT
by
Cosmo
To: lasereye
I heard somebody from Roll Call on the radio yesterday say two of the justices contributed to Torricelli's campaign. A search on Campaign Donation records here finds the following information:
New Jersey Supreme Court Justice James R. Zazzali:
ZAZZALI, JAMES R
RUMSON, NJ 07760
ZAZZALI ZAZZALI ET AL
New Jersey Supreme Court Justice Barry T. Albin:
ALBIN, BARRY T
EAST BRUINSWICK, NJ 08816
WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER
14
posted on
10/03/2002 11:41:06 AM PDT
by
Spiff
To: SkyPilot
Post #12. Definitely agreed!!!! SCOTUS should take the case and stand up for election laws!!!!
To: wcdukenfield
"... the justices ruled unanimously" What was the basis for the 3 Republican Judges for the ruling?
To: theDentist
What was the basis for the 3 Republican Judges for the ruling?Party affiliation does not prevent, cure, or even put a dent in **extreme** stupidity...
To: wcdukenfield
As Savage says, "The stench from the bench is making Mike clench".
To: wcdukenfield
What I want to know is -- is there anything here that would qualify for the USSC to take up the case?
Oh heck, maybe the USSC could just rule on it first, and let them file later!
To: wcdukenfield
<<"it is in the public interest and the general intent of the election laws to preserve the two-party system and to submit to the electorate a ballot bearing the names of candidates of both major political parties as well as of all other qualifying parties and groups.">>
ASAP, Somebody needs to inform the New Jersey supreme court that there is no Republican on the ballot in NJ's first district against House incumbent Rob Andrews! This is an outrageous disregard of the voters' rights!
20
posted on
10/03/2002 12:12:14 PM PDT
by
Demian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
