Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So What's the Law Now in New Jersey?
The Volokh Conspiracy  ^ | October 2, 2002 | Eugene Volokh

Posted on 10/02/2002 4:55:45 PM PDT by Timesink

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: MJY1288
Good plan!
21 posted on 10/02/2002 5:11:44 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
What is the law on campaign contributions given to one candidate and the demonrats switch candidates on you?

Shouldn't the money be returned to the donor?
22 posted on 10/02/2002 5:12:11 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink

23 posted on 10/02/2002 5:12:53 PM PDT by bmwcyle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
If this keeps up, we will be voting in one party elections just like they did in the Eastern Bloc a few years ago.
24 posted on 10/02/2002 5:13:33 PM PDT by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
LOL! the stench from the bench

Good catch.

25 posted on 10/02/2002 5:14:54 PM PDT by Freemeorkillme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Forrester should use this Bullsh*t move by the rats and beat them over the head with it. Pound them every chance he gets. Produce a commercial depicting Lautenberg as a pawn of the New Jersey Mafia
26 posted on 10/02/2002 5:15:42 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: madison46
Personally I think the USSC should send it back like they did FL and MAKE the NJSC address the LAW as passed by the CONSTITUTIONALLY authorized body.

The major difference is 3 USC 5 clearly spells out that the state laws for election of a President can not be changed after the electioon. 2 USC that covers the election of Senators and Representatives has no equivalent claus.

27 posted on 10/02/2002 5:16:16 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Schatze
Might invasion be a better plan? Move to NJ and Fla and take over from within? I'm in favor of that kind of brotherly support.
28 posted on 10/02/2002 5:16:55 PM PDT by Freemeorkillme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
...arbitrary shackles...

Properly adhering to election laws? Fegetaboudit...

About to do time on corruption charges? Fegetaboudit...

Still serving a sentence from the last election? Fegetaboudit...

29 posted on 10/02/2002 5:16:59 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
New Joesey is a unique state; it is the only state in fifty that has a governor and a judiciary, but no legislative branch. Floriduh is working hard to join this new wave isnpired by democrats sick of following having to negate laws and a Constitution.
30 posted on 10/02/2002 5:17:06 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Dates and Deadlines are now arbitary in Florida and NJ. I would suggest nobody pays taxes on these arbitary deadlines.
31 posted on 10/02/2002 5:17:40 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oyez
If this keeps up, we will be voting in one party elections just like they did in the Eastern Bloc a few years ago

And we'll be branded counter revolutinaries, charged as enemies of the people...

32 posted on 10/02/2002 5:17:46 PM PDT by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
We should start a thread asking for ideas for attack adds on the "Criminal Enterprise" otherwise known as the Democratic Party
33 posted on 10/02/2002 5:18:02 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions
The NJ Supreme Court had two issues before them today:

1. Torricelli wanted off the ballot.

2. The DemocRATs wanted someone else on.

The Supremes decided the case on the basis that the "voters" should have a choice.

If they had ruled against 1. and 2., the voters would have had a choice.

The DemocRAT party and the NJ Supreme Court are criminal enterprises.

If the people can't get redress from SCOTUS, it's over for the people of New Jersey.

34 posted on 10/02/2002 5:19:30 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch
"Shouldn't the money be returned to the donor" Yea in your dreams. This is the Torch of the bribes. The Law in New Jersey now is VOTE REPUBLICIAN.
35 posted on 10/02/2002 5:19:35 PM PDT by mom-7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
I wish I lived in NJ. Traffic lights and speed limits are such a hassle here in Seattle.
Oh to be free of these arbitrary shackles, as are the citizens of NJ...

Ummm... RobRoy? Throw out the traffic lights and speed limits in the Seattle area... and you aren't going to get there one bit faster because of the traffic choking the roadways that haven't seen improvement in a decade or more of democRat rule. (where did the money go...?) Sheesh -- even out here in Redmond one can walk through downtown at noon faster than one can drive.

36 posted on 10/02/2002 5:20:26 PM PDT by Eala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
I suppose there's just no such thing as an election law.

You need more votes? Just hold the polls open past scheduled closing time.

You expect your opponent to get more votes late in the day? Declare the whole state closed even though part of it sits in another time zone.

You don't like the kind of ballot used? Just count it however many times it takes for a chad to fall out from all the twisting & handling.

KNOW your candidate is gonna lose? Dump & replace him regardless of the preset deadline.

I suppose next, if you get enough Dumocraps mobbed together, you rush the White House and declare your junior Senator from New York the new President, huh?

37 posted on 10/02/2002 5:20:56 PM PDT by Wondervixen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Hell's Bells. The entire GOP should be raging mad.

We need Trent Lott to come out with the same righteous vitriol against what has transpired here in NJ as he did against what the princes of Bagmad did.

Freemeorkillme(more than a signature, a statement)
38 posted on 10/02/2002 5:21:44 PM PDT by Freemeorkillme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jackbill
If the people can't get redress from SCOTUS, it's over for the people of New Jersey.

I contend it's over for all of us:
How Tyranny Came To America

39 posted on 10/02/2002 5:23:40 PM PDT by Eala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Freemeorkillme
Might invasion be a better plan?

Well, it might be if the Islamakazis hadn't already done so ...

40 posted on 10/02/2002 5:23:57 PM PDT by Schatze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson