Skip to comments.
Sun to Show Plans for Low-Cost Linux PC
Reuters ^
| September 18, 2002 12:05 AM ET
Posted on 09/18/2002 10:55:18 PM PDT by Knitebane
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
I'm not a big Sun Microsystems fan, but choice is always good. If nothing else, those businesses with a lot of Sun boxes in their server farm will like this option.
Now if IBM starts shipping PowerPC systems with Linux and HP/Compaq restart the Alpha line running Linux, we might have an interesting market battle. Too bad that's not likely to happen.
1
posted on
09/18/2002 10:55:18 PM PDT
by
Knitebane
To: rdb3
Another Linux story for your distribution channel. :)
2
posted on
09/18/2002 10:55:56 PM PDT
by
Knitebane
To: Knitebane
After all the crashes I've had in Win 98/SE this week, I'm looking forward to trying another, more affordable, more stable OS.
To: Knitebane
| If nothing else, those businesses with a lot of Sun boxes in their server farm will like this option. You can pretty much bet it will be nothing else. These sound like low-cost boxes for vertical-market production apps, where the machine runs the same call center or shipping dock application 24-by-7.
At least, that's how the sales force slipped it by McNealy. "We're leaving money on the table. They would buy these things from us, if we had them." This isn't Sun's game, though, and they're going to be sorry they did this. The manufacturing culture of a high-end, architecture-rich hardware vendor is not the place to try to build high-volume low-cost boxen out of commodity parts. It sounds like one could do the other easily enough, but there's more to it than meets the eye. It is really is a cultural difference; you almost can't have the two things in the same company. You watch: the merger of Compaq and HP will ruin them both. The right answer for the problem Sun has is a deal with Apple. Maybe it's too soon for that, or maybe the announcement of these machines is a stick they are waving at Jobs because he's playing too hard to get. |
To: Knitebane
Didn't mention the distro. Wonder if they have their own flavor in the works.
5
posted on
09/19/2002 12:14:43 AM PDT
by
paul544
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: John Robinson; B Knotts; stainlessbanner; TechJunkYard; ShadowAce; Knitebane; AppyPappy; jae471; ...
The Penguin Ping.
Wanna be Penguified? Just holla!
Got root?
7
posted on
09/19/2002 4:55:52 AM PDT
by
rdb3
To: Nick Danger
This sounds like Oracle's NC-1 effort. I understand that they make GREAT doorstops...
8
posted on
09/19/2002 5:39:06 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
To: Knitebane
I hate to tell Sun, but they have been beaten to the punch by Wal-Mart. Lindows or Mandrake available on decent systems starting at $389. They used to sell equip with no OS and just recently started using Linux.
9
posted on
09/19/2002 5:54:48 AM PDT
by
zx2dragon
To: Poohbah
This sounds like Oracle's NC-1 effort. I understand that they make GREAT doorstops... I don't know to what extent things like that might be succeeding where they make sense. One problem we have with 'computer journalism' outside the trade rags (and sometimes even in them) is that the reporters view everything through the lens of the consumer PC market. If they don't see the thing on the shelves at Wal*Mart, they think it's a flop.
Lots of technologies are used in data center computing that never make their way into the popular press. I suspect these "network computers" are among them. They make sense for some apps. They never will for the consumer desktop. My hunch is that they are winning where they are customized to the app... similar in concept to those POS terminals at McDonald's, where instead of a QWERTY keyboard they have buttons labeled "Cheesburger" and "Big Mac." You don't want an "Office Engine" in an environment like that. You want the simplest, cheapest thing you can find, that not even a Floriduh voter could screw up. No moving parts? So much the better.
To: Knitebane
If these lowend servers with linux will support suns new "virtual server" they are hyping, I'll probably be buying a few of em.
To: zx2dragon
I hate to tell Sun, but they have been beaten to the punch by Wal-Mart. Lindows or Mandrake available on decent systems starting at $389. They used to sell equip with no OS and just recently started using Linux. While I applaud WalMart for taking on the Microsoft juggernaut, they aren't a major PC distributor.
Sun is. While I would prefer that Sun do this on both Sparc and an Intel platform, it's still a departure for them.
In reality, this probably won't be a very big deal for most PC users. This is targeted towards major Sun server purchasers, allowing businesses to consolidate their server and workstation support costs.
But hey, Linux users will likely get some better code for the Sparc-specific parts of the Linux kernel, so those of us that like to buy Sparc hardware and install Linux on it will get something out of it too.
To: Knitebane
"Now if IBM starts shipping PowerPC systems with Linux and HP/Compaq restart the Alpha line running Linux, we might have an interesting market battle. Too bad that's not likely to happen."It is happening! IBM has announced native Linux support will be provided on the entire line of RS/6000 RISC servers. Previously Linux had only been available as a "client OS" running under the AIX OS. Now there will be no need for AIX at all on these boxes.
As for Alpha, I suspect it is well and truely dead. For one thing HP has to stop supporting so many CPUs, they have Alpha (sole user), PA RISC (sole user), MIPS in Tandems (used by SGI and Nintendo??) and Intel. They have a stated goal to go all Intel, and given the IP they put into the Intel Itanium (and its PA RISC compatibility) I doubt they will back down on this.
To: Nick Danger
You want the simplest, cheapest thing you can find, that not even a Floriduh voter could screw up."To dream the impossible dream..."
14
posted on
09/19/2002 8:32:20 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
To: Knitebane
While I applaud WalMart for taking on the Microsoft juggernaut, they aren't a major PC distributor. Sun is. While I would prefer that Sun do this on both Sparc and an Intel platform, it's still a departure for them.
This is hilarious. Sun is trying to carve a desktop Linux market where none exists -- or will for any forseeable future. I look forward to McNealy's future admission that this was an ill-advised boondoggle.
15
posted on
09/19/2002 8:55:34 AM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: Knitebane
BTW, do you recall what happened to SGI when they tried to start building low-cost workstations from commodity parts -- when, in fact, their real strength was powerful, proprietary workstations? It damn near destroyed them.
16
posted on
09/19/2002 8:59:04 AM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: Nick Danger
... not the place try to build high-volume low-cost boxen out of commodity partsSun started doing this with the PCI based Ultra5/10.
17
posted on
09/19/2002 9:41:17 AM PDT
by
j_tull
To: Bush2000
This is hilarious. Sun is trying to carve a desktop Linux market where none exists -- or will for any forseeable future. I look forward to McNealy's future admission that this was an ill-advised boondoggle. The demise of Windows is inevitable because of their descent into licensing hell. Sun may or may not have the timing right for this foray, that remains to be seen.
The great thing for consumers is that even if Sun manages to ride the Linux desktop wave ahead of everyone else, the availability of Linux for other platforms keeps them from locking out other operating systems and using the same strongarm tactics as Microsoft. Users will always have a choice, unlike the Windows world today.
To: Knitebane
If Sun just tries to sell white boxes with Lindows, this will be a failure. But if they offer something like an Linux iMac, but cheaper, it could be successful. They really need to focus on the look and feel of the desktop. Preconfigured to have anti-aliasing on out of the box, and with decent fonts installed, KDE 3.1 is competitive with anything else out there. A little tweaking here and there is all that's needed to keep newbies from being confused.
19
posted on
09/19/2002 11:05:35 AM PDT
by
B Knotts
To: Knitebane
The demise of Windows is inevitable because of their descent into licensing hell...
LMFAO. I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you. You simply don't know what you're fighting against. MS has nearly $50B in the bank. That's more than the top 10 fortune 100 companies combined. Do you understand what that kind of cash can do?!?
20
posted on
09/19/2002 11:09:36 AM PDT
by
Bush2000
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson