Skip to comments.
NOW is NOT the time (Women members of Augusta Nat'l)
ESPN.com ^
| 9/5/02
| Jason Whitlock
Posted on 09/05/2002 10:58:15 AM PDT by buzzyboop
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Ms Burk has prompted an avalanche of ill will for her nonsense. Jealous bi---.
1
posted on
09/05/2002 10:58:16 AM PDT
by
buzzyboop
To: buzzyboop
whoever wrote this crap needs an asswhippin' too !!!!!
all those platitudes to justify the next sentence
liberal writing style, is suffered only in that
I read it. ESPN,isn't that a Sumner Redstone influence?
To: buzzyboop
Jason Whitlock is full of sh**. He is a local reporter for the Star and has a morning radio show. Nornally, he can be entertaining, but in recent years he has been playing the race card from the bottom of the deck.
I agree with the conclusion of his argument, but he is totally inconsistant and hypocritical in his argument to reach his conclusion.
To: TroutStalker
Whitlock Bump
To: buzzyboop
Jealous bi---. Never assume anything. She could be a lesbian, oh, you meant *itch.
5
posted on
09/05/2002 11:14:14 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: KC_Conspirator; cactusSharp
Agree with both of you.. more like a Disney influence, but it just illustrates the (lack of) support this idiot Martha Burk is getting. She must even be surprised.
6
posted on
09/05/2002 11:15:01 AM PDT
by
buzzyboop
To: KC_Conspirator
I agree with the conclusion of his argument, but he is totally inconsistant and hypocritical in his argument to reach his conclusion. My interpretation as well.
7
posted on
09/05/2002 11:15:01 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: buzzyboop
There was one paragraph I agreed with - the one after the "Hell Yeah".
The author, as well as most people, just don't get it. Private discrimination IS NOT "bad". He goes through long-winded diatribes to show that private gender discrimination is fine, but all other forms of "discriination" are not fine. He even throws in a punch at "gays".
The authors basic premis is that only discrimination he says is good, in fact is. All other is bad. Forget Freedom of Association, this guys opinion trumps everything.
8
posted on
09/05/2002 11:16:50 AM PDT
by
FreeTally
9
posted on
09/05/2002 11:17:48 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: buzzyboop
I agree with the conclusion of his argument, but he is totally inconsistant and hypocritical in his argument to reach his conclusion. I'm curious to know what you though the conclusion of his argument was? It seemed to me all he was saying is that gender discrimination is fine for private organizations, but no other form of discrimination can be tolerated. He never even touched on freedom of association.
To: KC_Conspirator; buzzyboop
woops! #10 was ment for you KC.
To: buzzyboop
Racial discrimination sentences black men to death row at an alarming rate.And to think, all this time, I was tricked into believing they go to death row on account of some heinous crimes they had committed.
To: buzzyboop
"to smoke fine cigars, exchange dirty jokes and lie about your golf game, sexual exploits and how hard you worked"
Holy crap batman. That's just the gig I've been looking for. Where do I sign up??
Seriously, are there any guys out there that don't like the sound of this statement??
13
posted on
09/05/2002 11:23:55 AM PDT
by
3k9pm
To: FreeTally
Yes, you are correct. Its ok to discrimate against women at a golf club (like our local Wolf Creek), yet its bad if its racial discrimination. And of course, if you equate radical feminism and radical gay rights with racial civil rights, then you are just riding coattails. How's that for contradictory logic?
To: COB1; LadyX; Scuttlebutt; razorback-bert; beowolf; Fred Mertz; humblegunner; Eaker; Pippin; ...
Dang uppity wimmin.
Next they'll want to vote.
15
posted on
09/05/2002 11:40:02 AM PDT
by
ofMagog
To: ofMagog
Dang uppity wimmin.
Next they'll want to vote.
I don't want to cause you any undue alarm. But you may want to slip into these asbestos overalls. They may come in handy.
Man I'm glad I didn't say that (wiping sweat off brow).
16
posted on
09/05/2002 11:42:54 AM PDT
by
3k9pm
To: buzzyboop
SLANDER heads up...
The argument is exclusively stated in terms of 'discrimination' (racial discrimination at that) and never expressed in terms of freedom of association.
lots of white male bashing here, too...
Jason Whitlock sounds like just another hand-wringing neo-Stalinist with his panties in a twist.
To: 1Old Pro
jealous bi---. Yup, either one works..
To: buzzyboop
Why does ESPN have to publish politically leftist junk even when they're opposing politically leftist activism? This column barely rememembers to make the point it intends - that Augusta National shouldn't buckle to Burk's activism.
Jason Whitlock is a racist who slanders people he doesn't like on the basis of their ethnicity and skin color. But apparently that's ok, provided he's also a leftist and black.
To: buzzyboop
This piece had me cheering until Whitlock spit out "Uncle Thomas." What a disappointment.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson