Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Forest Service ignores offers of Russian help [use of water transport plane refused]
WorldNetDaily ^ | August 27, 2002 | Sarah Foster

Posted on 08/28/2002 6:22:55 PM PDT by 2sheep

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
 WND still evacuated due to 'hellacious' blaze
 Feds shun help with firefighting
 County tells feds: We're taking over
 'Endangered' Act blamed for fire
 The Greens are toast – burned toast
 Burn, baby, burn
 Why America is burning
1 posted on 08/28/2002 6:22:55 PM PDT by 2sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Daughter; Thinkin' Gal; Jeremiah Jr; babylonian; Fred Mertz; American in Israel; ...
Bump.
2 posted on 08/28/2002 6:37:01 PM PDT by 2sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep
"The Associated Press reported that then-District IX FEMA director Buddy Young..."

Any astute Freepers recognize this guy's name?

Also, before anyone asks, no scuba diver was ever sucked into one of these planes and dumped into a forest fire. It's an urban legend. The harvest intakes on these planes wouldn't allow a monkey through, let alone a human. How do I know this? I toured one in Canada two years ago and asked the tour guide about the story. He laughed and then debunked the story for about the hundredth time.

This plane is a real marvel, and so are the pilots. They not only have to be excellent pilots, they are also trained in photogrammetry so that they can from the air recognize "good" water and "bad" water in which to skim their planes (they don't actually land, but scoop up water on the run).

3 posted on 08/28/2002 6:42:49 PM PDT by yooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep; Grampa Dave
A test of this plane would have been nice in smokey SW Oregon.

The current fire fighting cost here in Oregon could possibly have been saved along with a lot of wilderness area if this plane had been given a chance at any time since the fire started.

I guess the person(s) making the decisions on this plane feel the $116 million and growing cost for the Biscuit fire is better then looking at new technics.

Job security?

4 posted on 08/28/2002 6:46:06 PM PDT by wanderin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep
Satan comes to America to kill, steal, and destroy Let's not stop him now.
5 posted on 08/28/2002 6:50:27 PM PDT by It'salmosttolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep
Divine... retribution!
6 posted on 08/28/2002 6:52:13 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep
Check these guys out.
Russian smokejumpers using equipment hopelessly outdated still manage to do pretty well for themselves.
They even make their own shovel handels from birch saplings!
7 posted on 08/28/2002 6:52:35 PM PDT by Saturnalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
The government should learn the difference between:


             Russian troops                                          Water
 

This is an airplane with WATER coming out.  Not Russian troops.

8 posted on 08/28/2002 6:56:39 PM PDT by 2sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
Join Me in "A Prayer Journey Across America"
9 posted on 08/28/2002 6:57:45 PM PDT by It'salmosttolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep
Is it a requirement that when you go to work for the federal government you loose all commmon sense?
10 posted on 08/28/2002 6:59:50 PM PDT by bybybill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bybybill
"Is it a requirement that when you go to work for the federal government you loose all commmon sense? "

"It's like wasting water," Walsh said. "Water is not a commodity we can just dump hundreds of thousands of gallons of and not worry about running out, especially in drought conditions."

Yes.

11 posted on 08/28/2002 7:17:48 PM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep
If this thd wasn't so serious it would be funny, I mean if this thd wasn't so funny it would be serious.
I don't know what I mean.
12 posted on 08/28/2002 7:27:23 PM PDT by It'salmosttolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep
The US C-141 is very comparable to, but in many ways better than, the IL-76. It just so happens that they have recently been retired to the boneyard. However they are being kept in flyable storage, and their engines are also being preserved. I'm sure that a few of lower flight time aircraft could be converted to a similar capability. But in the meantime, I see nothing wrong with using the Russian airplanes. That bunch of maroons we have in the forest service and FEMA need to get their heads out of where the sun don't shine.

13 posted on 08/28/2002 7:33:15 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bybybill; f.Christian; It'salmosttolate; Thinkin' Gal; Prodigal Daughter
>Is it a requirement that when you go to work for the federal government you lose all commmon sense?

It is a sign of the great falling away, the apostacy that has reduced the nation to a shadow.  Amongst G~d's promises to the disobedient and wicked is to send evil rulers to rule over them and then to send foreign enemies to conquer them.  Deut. 28 and lots of other places.  He also sends them and their leaders spiritual blindness.  Blind leaders of the blind who can't SEE to put out the fire are evil.  This decision about refusing a remedy to the fire situation may be in accordance with G~d's plan of judgment.  A remedy is offered and blind leaders refuse it.

Pr 6:15 Therefore shall his calamity come suddenly; suddenly shall he be broken without remedy.

Pr 29:1 He, that being often reproved hardeneth his neck, shall suddenly be destroyed, and that without remedy.

14 posted on 08/28/2002 7:35:45 PM PDT by 2sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; DrLiberty; Avoiding_Sulla; Uncle Bill; Noumenon
The US C-141 is very comparable to, but in many ways better than, the IL-76. It just so happens that they have recently been retired to the boneyard.  However they are being kept in flyable storage, and their engines are also being preserved.

Boneyard = graveyard.  It should give each American pause to think when it is apparent that Russia is ready, able and willing and the American government is not.  I thought the comment in the article at the top about this being "political" was important.  What do the globalists have to gain by destroying the country through incompetence.  Perhaps get rid of forests so they can stripmine the ground? 

15 posted on 08/28/2002 7:42:30 PM PDT by 2sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
The US C-141 is very comparable to, but in many ways better than, the IL-76.

The Il-76 does have the navigator(who controls the drop)'s Bomb-aimer station in the nose

Fire bombinng operations in the Il-76

few of lower flight time aircraft

Not sure such a beastie exists for the C-141, they've all been well-used since the '60s.

16 posted on 08/28/2002 7:56:28 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep
Big Russian Airplane Bump!

I have to give the Russians credit on this one. Looks like an impressive piece of hardware. As usual, what their aircraft lack in sophistication, they make up in brute size and payload. Those guys can sure build some big airplanes and helicopters!

BTW, I read recently that Boeing has a group of ~500 Russian engineers on the payroll at a facility in Moscow.

17 posted on 08/28/2002 8:00:41 PM PDT by TheEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yooper
Actually, like the C-130 Hercules, the Il-76 is a landplane that loads it's water on the ground. (It's just a lot bigger) (see link in my previous post fot operation)

However the Russkis do also build a fire fighting amphibian, the Be-200

While not in the Il-76 class, the Be-200, with a droppable load of 3300 gal, is still a pretty impressive big bomber.

Sikorsky le Grand, Tupelov Maxim Gorky, Antonov An-225 Mriya, if you need a big aircraft, think Russian.

18 posted on 08/28/2002 8:17:45 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yooper
Yes, Buddy Young rings a bell. Clintoon rewardee, right?
19 posted on 08/28/2002 8:33:38 PM PDT by MonroeDNA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep
the federal monster is crazy; The forest service explanation that these planes are a hazard is ridiculous. The fires are the hazard. The Russians are an important group of people for us to get along with, we should be overjoyed that they want to and are able to help.
20 posted on 08/28/2002 8:58:36 PM PDT by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson